Literature DB >> 28825749

The competing effects of core rigidity and linker flexibility in the nanoassembly of trivalent small molecule-DNA hybrids (SMDH3s)-a synergistic experimental-modeling study.

Vincent Y Cho1, Bong Jin Hong, Kevin L Kohlstedt, George C Schatz, SonBinh T Nguyen.   

Abstract

The nanoassembly behavior of trivalent small molecule-DNA hybrids (SMDH3s) was investigated as a function of core geometry and supramolecular flexibility through a synergistic experimental-modeling study. While complementary SMDH3s possessing a highly flexible tetrahedral trivalent core primarily assemble into nanoscale caged dimers, the nanoassemblies of SMDH3 comonomers with rigid pyramidal and trigonal cores yield fewer caged dimers and more large-oligomer networks. Specifically, the rigid pyramidal SMDH3 comonomers tend to form smaller nanosized aggregates (dimers, tetramers, and hexamers) upon assembly, attributable to the small (<109°) branch-core-branch angle of the pyramidal core. In contrast, the more-rigid trigonal planar SMDH3 comonomers have a larger (∼120°) branch-core-branch angle, which spaces their DNA arms farther apart, facilitating the formation of larger nanoassemblies (≥nonamers). The population distributions of these nanoassemblies were successfully captured by coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CGMD) simulations over a broad range of DNA concentrations. CGMD simulations can also forecast the effect of incorporating Tn spacer units between the hydridizing DNA arms and the rigid organic cores to increase the overall flexibility of the SMDH3 comonomers. Such "decoupling" of the DNA arms from the organic core was found to result in preferential formation of nanoscale dimers up to an optimal spacer length, beyond which network formation takes over due to entropic factors. This excellent agreement between the simulation and experimental results confirms the versatility of the CGMD model as a useful and reliable tool for elucidating the nanoassembly of SMDH-based building blocks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28825749      PMCID: PMC5804500          DOI: 10.1039/c7nr01931a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  36 in total

1.  Nanoparticle superlattice engineering with DNA.

Authors:  Robert J Macfarlane; Byeongdu Lee; Matthew R Jones; Nadine Harris; George C Schatz; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Enhancing DNA-Mediated Assemblies of Supramolecular Cage Dimers through Tuning Core Flexibility and DNA Length--A Combined Experimental-Modeling Study.

Authors:  Bong Jin Hong; Vincent Y Cho; Reiner Bleher; George C Schatz; SonBinh T Nguyen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Transfer of molecular recognition information from DNA nanostructures to gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Thomas G W Edwardson; Kai Lin Lau; Danny Bousmail; Christopher J Serpell; Hanadi F Sleiman
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 24.427

4.  Rapid chiral assembly of rigid DNA building blocks for molecular nanofabrication.

Authors:  R P Goodman; I A T Schaap; C F Tardin; C M Erben; R M Berry; C F Schmidt; A J Turberfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Nano-flares: probes for transfection and mRNA detection in living cells.

Authors:  Dwight S Seferos; David A Giljohann; Haley D Hill; Andrew E Prigodich; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Guest-mediated access to a single DNA nanostructure from a library of multiple assemblies.

Authors:  Faisal A Aldaye; Hanadi F Sleiman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Two base pair duplexes suffice to build a novel material.

Authors:  Martin Meng; Carolin Ahlborn; Matthias Bauer; Oliver Plietzsch; Shahid A Soomro; Arunoday Singh; Thierry Muller; Wolfgang Wenzel; Stefan Bräse; Clemens Richert
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 3.164

8.  What controls open-pore and residual currents in the first sensing zone of alpha-hemolysin nanopore? Combined experimental and theoretical study.

Authors:  Pablo M De Biase; Eric N Ervin; Prithwish Pal; Olga Samoylova; Suren Markosyan; Michael G Keehan; Geoffrey A Barrall; Sergei Yu Noskov
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 7.790

9.  Synthesis of eight-arm, branched oligonucleotide hybrids and studies on the limits of DNA-driven assembly.

Authors:  Alexander Schwenger; Claudia Gerlach; Helmut Griesser; Clemens Richert
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.354

10.  What controls the hybridization thermodynamics of spherical nucleic acids?

Authors:  Pratik S Randeria; Matthew R Jones; Kevin L Kohlstedt; Resham J Banga; Monica Olvera de la Cruz; George C Schatz; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.