Literature DB >> 28825732

p53 pulses lead to distinct patterns of gene expression albeit similar DNA-binding dynamics.

Antonina Hafner1, Jacob Stewart-Ornstein1, Jeremy E Purvis2, William C Forrester3, Martha L Bulyk4,5, Galit Lahav1.   

Abstract

The dynamics of transcription factors play important roles in a variety of biological systems. However, the mechanisms by which these dynamics are decoded into different transcriptional responses are not well understood. Here we focus on the dynamics of the tumor-suppressor protein p53, which exhibits a series of pulses in response to DNA damage. We performed time course RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) measurements to determine how p53 oscillations are linked with gene expression genome wide. We discovered multiple distinct patterns of gene expression in response to p53 pulses. Surprisingly, p53-binding dynamics were uniform across all genomic loci, even for genes that exhibited distinct mRNA dynamics. Using a mathematical model, supported by additional experimental measurements in response to sustained p53 input, we determined that p53 binds to and activates transcription of its target genes uniformly, whereas post-transcriptional mechanisms are responsible for the differences in gene expression dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28825732      PMCID: PMC5629117          DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol        ISSN: 1545-9985            Impact factor:   15.369


  45 in total

1.  ASPP proteins specifically stimulate the apoptotic function of p53.

Authors:  Y Samuels-Lev; D J O'Connor; D Bergamaschi; G Trigiante; J K Hsieh; S Zhong; I Campargue; L Naumovski; T Crook; X Lu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  p63 and p73 are required for p53-dependent apoptosis in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Elsa R Flores; Kenneth Y Tsai; Denise Crowley; Shomit Sengupta; Annie Yang; Frank McKeon; Tyler Jacks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A global map of p53 transcription-factor binding sites in the human genome.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Wei; Qiang Wu; Vinsensius B Vega; Kuo Ping Chiu; Patrick Ng; Tao Zhang; Atif Shahab; How Choong Yong; YuTao Fu; Zhiping Weng; JianJun Liu; Xiao Dong Zhao; Joon-Lin Chew; Yen Ling Lee; Vladimir A Kuznetsov; Wing-Kin Sung; Lance D Miller; Bing Lim; Edison T Liu; Qiang Yu; Huck-Hui Ng; Yijun Ruan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  A complex barcode underlies the heterogeneous response of p53 to stress.

Authors:  Fiona Murray-Zmijewski; Elizabeth A Slee; Xin Lu
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Recurrent initiation: a mechanism for triggering p53 pulses in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Eric Batchelor; Caroline S Mock; Irun Bhan; Alexander Loewer; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Stimulus specificity of gene expression programs determined by temporal control of IKK activity.

Authors:  Shannon L Werner; Derren Barken; Alexander Hoffmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update.

Authors:  Maxim V Kuleshov; Matthew R Jones; Andrew D Rouillard; Nicolas F Fernandez; Qiaonan Duan; Zichen Wang; Simon Koplev; Sherry L Jenkins; Kathleen M Jagodnik; Alexander Lachmann; Michael G McDermott; Caroline D Monteiro; Gregory W Gundersen; Avi Ma'ayan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Multiplex enhancer-reporter assays uncover unsophisticated TP53 enhancer logic.

Authors:  Annelien Verfaillie; Dmitry Svetlichnyy; Hana Imrichova; Kristofer Davie; Mark Fiers; Zeynep Kalender Atak; Gert Hulselmans; Valerie Christiaens; Stein Aerts
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Frequency-modulated nuclear localization bursts coordinate gene regulation.

Authors:  Long Cai; Chiraj K Dalal; Michael B Elowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Insights into p53 transcriptional function via genome-wide chromatin occupancy and gene expression analysis.

Authors:  F Nikulenkov; C Spinnler; H Li; C Tonelli; Y Shi; M Turunen; T Kivioja; I Ignatiev; A Kel; J Taipale; G Selivanova
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 15.828

View more
  37 in total

1.  NF-κB signaling dynamics is controlled by a dose-sensing autoregulatory loop.

Authors:  Mialy M DeFelice; Helen R Clark; Jacob J Hughey; Inbal Maayan; Takamasa Kudo; Miriam V Gutschow; Markus W Covert; Sergi Regot
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 8.192

2.  Fluctuations in p53 Signaling Allow Escape from Cell-Cycle Arrest.

Authors:  José Reyes; Jia-Yun Chen; Jacob Stewart-Ornstein; Kyle W Karhohs; Caroline S Mock; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Mathematical model identifies effective P53 accumulation with target gene binding affinity in DNA damage response for cell fate decision.

Authors:  Tingzhe Sun; Dan Mu; Jun Cui
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Fold-Change Detection of NF-κB at Target Genes with Different Transcript Outputs.

Authors:  Victor C Wong; Shibin Mathew; Ramesh Ramji; Suzanne Gaudet; Kathryn Miller-Jensen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Cell-Cycle-Dependent ERK Signaling Dynamics Direct Fate Specification in the Mammalian Preimplantation Embryo.

Authors:  Michael J Pokrass; Kathleen A Ryan; Tianchi Xin; Brittany Pielstick; Winston Timp; Valentina Greco; Sergi Regot
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Rucaparib Treatment Alters p53 Oscillations in Single Cells to Enhance DNA-Double-Strand-Break-Induced Cell Cycle Arrest.

Authors:  Ryan L Hanson; Eric Batchelor
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Gene Regulatory Strategies that Decode the Duration of NFκB Dynamics Contribute to LPS- versus TNF-Specific Gene Expression.

Authors:  Supriya Sen; Zhang Cheng; Katherine M Sheu; Yu Hsin Chen; Alexander Hoffmann
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 10.304

8.  Quantifying the Central Dogma in the p53 Pathway in Live Single Cells.

Authors:  Antonina Hafner; José Reyes; Jacob Stewart-Ornstein; Michael Tsabar; Ashwini Jambhekar; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 10.304

Review 9.  The multiple mechanisms that regulate p53 activity and cell fate.

Authors:  Antonina Hafner; Martha L Bulyk; Ashwini Jambhekar; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  WDR63 inhibits Arp2/3-dependent actin polymerization and mediates the function of p53 in suppressing metastasis.

Authors:  Kailiang Zhao; Decai Wang; Xiaolong Zhao; Chenfeng Wang; Yongxiang Gao; Kaiyue Liu; Fang Wang; Xianning Wu; Xuejuan Wang; Linfeng Sun; Jianye Zang; Yide Mei
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 8.807

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.