Literature DB >> 28825248

[Nomogram to predict a poor outcome in emergency patients with sepsis and at low risk of organ damage according to Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)].

Eva García-Villalba1, Alfredo Cano-Sánchez1, Antonia Alcaraz-García1, César Cinesi-Gómez2, Pascual Piñera-Salmerón2, Irene Marín1, Ángeles Muñoz1, Tomás Vicente Vera3, Enrique Bernal-Morell3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a nomograph to predict a poor outcome (death during hospitalization or a hospital stay longer than 15 days) in emergency patients with sepsis and at low risk of organ damage according to Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, observational study carried out in a single universitary hospital. All patients admitted from the emergency department with sepsis and SOFA scores of 6 or lower were enrolled. We used bivariate logistic regression analysis to develop a predictive nomogram.
RESULTS: A total of 174 patients were included. Seventeen patients (9.8%) died during hospitalization and the average hospital stay was greater than 15 days in 29 (16.7%) patient. The outcome was poor in a total of 42 patients (24.1%);. Independent variables that were significantly associated with a poor outcome were SOFA score (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.06-1.71; P<.05), C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.0-1.09; P<.05), N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration over 1330 ng/mL (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.17-6.22; P<.05), and septic shock (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 1.16-166.5; P<.05). For a SOFA score of 2 or more the crude OR was 4.44 (95%, CI, 1.91-10.34) and the OR adjusted for other variables was 3.08 (95% CI, 1.24-7.69).
CONCLUSION: A high percentage of patients predicted to be at low risk of organ failure had poor outcomes, associated with SOFA score, the presence of septic shock, CRP concentration, and elevated NT-proBNP concentration. The SOFA score by itself is an inadequate prognostic tool in patients at low risk of organ damage. Other clinical and analytical variables are required to complement the SOFA score.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mal pronóstico; Poor prognosis; Predicción; Prediction; Sepsis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28825248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emergencias        ISSN: 1137-6821            Impact factor:   3.881


  4 in total

1.  Biomarkers in Shock Patients and Their Value as A Prognostic Tool; A Prospective Multi-Center Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ana Maria Navio Serano; Joaquín Valle Alonso; Gustavo Rene Piñero; Alejandro Rodriguez Camacho; Josefa Soriano Benet; Manuel Vaquero
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2019-07

Review 2.  Current aspects in sepsis approach. Turning things around.

Authors:  F J Candel; M Borges Sá; S Belda; G Bou; J L Del Pozo; O Estrada; R Ferrer; J González Del Castillo; A Julián-Jiménez; I Martín-Loeches; E Maseda; M Matesanz; P Ramírez; J T Ramos; J Rello; B Suberviola; A Suárez de la Rica; P Vidal
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 1.553

3.  [Recommendations for the care of patients with community-acquired pneumonia in the Emergency Department].

Authors:  A Julián-Jiménez; I Adán Valero; A Beteta López; L M Cano Martín; O Fernández Rodríguez; R Rubio Díaz; M A Sepúlveda Berrocal; J González Del Castillo; F J Candel González
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.553

4.  [Integral approach to the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

Authors:  J González Del Castillo; F J Candel; J de la Fuente; F Gordo; F J Martín-Sánchez; R Menéndez; A Mujal; J Barberán
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 1.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.