BACKGROUND: Following through on one's goals to study is essential for effective, self-regulated learning. This can be difficult for residents because of clinical demands and limited personal time. WOOP (Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan) is a self-regulation strategy, also known as mental contrasting with implementation intentions. WOOP increases follow-through on goals in many domains, although it has not, to our knowledge, been evaluated in medical education. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effect of WOOP versus goal setting on time residents spent studying. METHODS: Through a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness study, during a 1-month, intensive care unit rotation, we clustered anesthesiology residents in single-blind fashion to WOOP versus goal setting. Both groups received organized study materials. The intervention group performed WOOP to study more; the comparison group set goals to study more. Residents tracked studying with daily diaries. The primary outcome was total time spent studying toward stated goals. Time spent studying "non-goal" medical material was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Of 34 eligible residents, 100% participated. Sixteen residents were randomized to the WOOP group and 18 to the goal-setting group. The WOOP group spent significantly more time studying toward their goals compared with the goal-setting group (median = 4.3 hours versus 1.5 hours; P = .021; g = 0.66). There was no significant difference in time spent studying non-goal medical material between groups (median = 5.5 hours versus 5.0 hours, P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: WOOP increased the time residents spent studying toward their goals as compared with setting goals alone.
BACKGROUND: Following through on one's goals to study is essential for effective, self-regulated learning. This can be difficult for residents because of clinical demands and limited personal time. WOOP (Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan) is a self-regulation strategy, also known as mental contrasting with implementation intentions. WOOP increases follow-through on goals in many domains, although it has not, to our knowledge, been evaluated in medical education. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effect of WOOP versus goal setting on time residents spent studying. METHODS: Through a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness study, during a 1-month, intensive care unit rotation, we clustered anesthesiology residents in single-blind fashion to WOOP versus goal setting. Both groups received organized study materials. The intervention group performed WOOP to study more; the comparison group set goals to study more. Residents tracked studying with daily diaries. The primary outcome was total time spent studying toward stated goals. Time spent studying "non-goal" medical material was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Of 34 eligible residents, 100% participated. Sixteen residents were randomized to the WOOP group and 18 to the goal-setting group. The WOOP group spent significantly more time studying toward their goals compared with the goal-setting group (median = 4.3 hours versus 1.5 hours; P = .021; g = 0.66). There was no significant difference in time spent studying non-goal medical material between groups (median = 5.5 hours versus 5.0 hours, P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: WOOP increased the time residents spent studying toward their goals as compared with setting goals alone.
Authors: Daniel Saddawi-Konefka; Daniel J Schumacher; Keith H Baker; Jonathan E Charnin; Peter M Gollwitzer Journal: Acad Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Lara Zisblatt; Fei Chen; Dawn Dillman; Amy N DiLorenzo; Mark P MacEachern; Amy Miller Juve; Emily E Peoples; Ashley E Grantham Journal: Cureus Date: 2019-06-05
Authors: Adam P Sawatsky; Andrew J Halvorsen; Paul R Daniels; Sara L Bonnes; Meltiady Issa; John T Ratelle; Christopher R Stephenson; Thomas J Beckman Journal: Med Educ Online Date: 2020-12