| Literature DB >> 28824456 |
James H Barrington1, Bryna C R Chrismas2, Oliver R Gibson3, James Tuttle1, J Pegrum4, S Govilkar4, Chindu Kabir4, N Giannakakis4, F Rayan4, Z Okasheh4, A Sanaullah4, S Ng Man Sun4, Oliver Pearce4, Lee Taylor5,6.
Abstract
Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is valid technique which elicits reductions in femoral blood flow occlusion mediated reperfusion stress (oxidative stress, Hsp gene transcripts) within the systemic blood circulation and/or skeletal muscle. It is unknown whether systemic hypoxia, evoked by hypoxic preconditioning (HPC) has efficacy in priming the heat shock protein (Hsp) system thus reducing reperfusion stress following blood flow occlusion, in the same manner as IPC. The comparison between IPC and HPC being relevant as a preconditioning strategy prior to orthopedic surgery. In an independent group design, 18 healthy men were exposed to 40 min of (1) passive whole-body HPC (FiO2 = 0.143; no ischemia. N = 6), (2) IPC (FiO2 = 0.209; four bouts of 5 min ischemia and 5 min reperfusion. n = 6), or (3) rest (FiO2 = 0.209; no ischemia. n = 6). The interventions were administered 1 h prior to 30 min of tourniquet derived femoral blood flow occlusion and were followed by 2 h subsequent reperfusion. Systemic blood samples were taken pre- and post-intervention. Systemic blood and gastrocnemius skeletal muscle samples were obtained pre-, 15 min post- (15PoT) and 120 min (120PoT) post-tourniquet deflation. To determine the cellular stress response gastrocnemius and leukocyte Hsp72 mRNA and Hsp32 mRNA gene transcripts were determined by RT-qPCR. The plasma oxidative stress response (protein carbonyl, reduced glutathione/oxidized glutathione ratio) was measured utilizing commercially available kits. In comparison to control, at 15PoT a significant difference in gastrocnemius Hsp72 mRNA was seen in HPC (-1.93-fold; p = 0.007) and IPC (-1.97-fold; p = 0.006). No significant differences were observed in gastrocnemius Hsp32 and Hsp72 mRNA, leukocyte Hsp72 and Hsp32 mRNA, or oxidative stress markers (p > 0.05) between HPC and IPC. HPC provided near identical amelioration of blood flow occlusion mediated gastrocnemius stress response (Hsp72 mRNA), compared to an established IPC protocol. This was seen independent of changes in systemic oxidative stress, which likely explains the absence of change in Hsp32 mRNA transcripts within leukocytes and the gastrocnemius. Both the established IPC and novel HPC interventions facilitate a priming of the skeletal muscle, but not leukocyte, Hsp system prior to femoral blood flow occlusion. This response demonstrates a localized tissue specific adaptation which may ameliorate reperfusion stress.Entities:
Keywords: heat shock proteins; hypoxic preconditioning; ischemia; ischemic preconditioning; knee surgery; oxidative stress
Year: 2017 PMID: 28824456 PMCID: PMC5539087 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Participant characteristic data.
| Age (years) | 22.2 | 2.9 | 18–26 | 20.8 | 2.4 | 19–25 | 18.5 | 0.6 | 18–19 |
| Height (m) | 1.83 | 0.06 | 1.75–1.92 | 1.77 | 0.10 | 1.67–1.93 | 1.79 | 0.04 | 1.73–1.83 |
| Mass (kg) | 80.4 | 12.4 | 62.8–93.4 | 73.5 | 8.7 | 61.9–86.6 | 76.7 | 7.8 | 64.8–87.4 |
| Lean mass (%) | 85.8 | 3.5 | 79.3–88.5 | 84.9 | 5.3 | 78.9–91.4 | 86.5 | 3.0 | 81.5–90.1 |
| Fat mass (%) | 14.2 | 3.5 | 11.5–20.7 | 15.3 | 5.5 | 8.6–22.1 | 13.5 | 3.0 | 9.9–18.5 |
| Thigh circumference (cm) | 44.7 | 2.6 | 40–47 | 42.8 | 2.1 | 40–46 | 43.3 | 2.4 | 39–46 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 124.0 | 3.0 | 120–129 | 125.8 | 1.9 | 123–129 | 125.5 | 2.1 | 123–129 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 76.2 | 7.0 | 65–83 | 75.0 | 6.0 | 65–81 | 79.7 | 8.0 | 70–92 |
Significant difference vs. CON (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Experimental overview blood samples (↓) were obtained at basal, immediately post-intervention (PoI), immediately pre-tourniquet application (PrT), 15 min post-tourniquet removal (15PoT), and 120 min post-tourniquet removal (120PoT) with gastrocnemius tissue (¥) collected at PrT, 15PoT, and 120 PoT.
Primer sequences used in One-step reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
| B2 microglobulin | Forward: CCGTGTGAACCATGTGACT | 19 | 52.63 | |
| Reverse: TGCGGCATCTTCAAACCT | 18 | 50.00 | ||
| HSP 72 | Forward: CGCAACGTGCTCATCTTTGA | 20 | 50.00 | |
| Reverse: TCGCTTGTTCTGGCTGATGT | 20 | 50.00 | ||
| HSP32 | Forward: CAGCAACAAAGTGCAAGAT | 19 | 42.11 | |
| Reverse: CTGAGTGTAAGGACCCATC | 19 | 52.63 |
Figure 2Mean (SD) HR and oxyhaemoglobin saturation during the hypoxic intervention in HPC. *Indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) vs. baseline values.
Figure 3Mean (SD) gastrocnemius Hsp32 mRNA (top) and Hsp72 mRNA (bottom) expression. Gastrocnemius samples were obtained from CON (n = 5), HPC (n = 6), and IPC (n = 6) immediately pre-tourniquet application (PrT), 15 min post-tourniquet removal (15PoT), and 120 min post-tourniquet removal (120PoT). All experimental samples were expressed relative to a laboratory control gastrocnemius sample (from Basal). Letters (a, b, c, d) denote significant differences between corresponding letter (p < 0.05).
Mean (SD) circulatory markers of redox disturbance and stress protein expression.
| Leukocyte Hsp72 (relative fold change from basal) | 1.46 (0.42) | 1.29 (0.39) | 1.72 (0.54) | 1.46 (0.55) | 1.23 (0.44) | 1.31 (0.17) | 1.43 (0.41) | 1.45 (0.36) | 1.31 (0.35) | 1.44 (0.43) | 1.57 (0.31) | 1.33 (0.14) | 1.23 (0.44) | 1.35 (0.27) | 1.35 (0.21) |
| Leukocyte Hsp32 (relative fold change from basal) | 1.34 (0.43) | 1.08 (0.24) | 1.47 (0.55) | 1.09 (0.33) | 1.14 (0.24) | 1.23 (0.40) | 0.86 (0.14) | 1.10 (0.28) | 1.29 (0.29) | 0.86 (0.28) | 1.24 (0.27) | 1.17 (0.33) | 1.04 (0.45) | 1.02 (0.41) | 1.08 (0.38) |
| Protein Carbonyl (nmol·mL−1) | 0.56 (0.14) | 0.56 (0.19) | 0.69 (0.24) | 0.54 (0.16) | 0.42 (0.13) | 0.61 (0.13) | 0.64 (0.13) | 0.58 (0.08) | 0.69 (0.21) | 0.65 (0.18) | 0.60 (0.24) | 0.56 (0.15) | 0.65 (0.32) | 0.69 (0.15) | 0.63 (0.21) |
| Reduced/oxidized glutathione ratio | 23.0 (9.1) | 31.4 (12.2) | 22.7 (8.6) | 24.6 (9.6) | 29.3 (5.4) | 28.9 (7.4) | 27.1 (11.6) | 23.9 (7.3) | 18.6 (7.6) | 27.6 (10.7) | 20.5 (3.6) | 23.1 (8.7) | 23.0 (7.7) | 22.4 (2.2) | 20.5 (9.6) |
Measurements were evaluated at basal, immediately post-intervention (PoI), immediately pre-tourniquet application (PrT), 15 min post-tourniquet removal (15PoT), and 120 min post-tourniquet removal (120PoT).