| Literature DB >> 28824446 |
Gian C Demontis1, Marco M Germani2, Enrico G Caiani3, Ivana Barravecchia1,2, Claudio Passino2,4, Debora Angeloni2.
Abstract
Space is an extreme environment for the human body, where during long-term missions microgravity and high radiation levels represent major threats to crew health. Intriguingly, space flight (SF) imposes on the body of highly selected, well-trained, and healthy individuals (astronauts and cosmonauts) pathophysiological adaptive changes akin to an accelerated aging process and to some diseases. Such effects, becoming manifest over a time span of weeks (i.e., cardiovascular deconditioning) to months (i.e., loss of bone density and muscle atrophy) of exposure to weightlessness, can be reduced through proper countermeasures during SF and in due time are mostly reversible after landing. Based on these considerations, it is increasingly accepted that SF might provide a mechanistic insight into certain pathophysiological processes, a concept of interest to pre-nosological medicine. In this article, we will review the main stress factors encountered in space and their impact on the human body and will also discuss the possible lessons learned with space exploration in reference to human health on Earth. In fact, this is a productive, cross-fertilized, endeavor in which studies performed on Earth yield countermeasures for protection of space crew health, and space research is translated into health measures for Earth-bound population.Entities:
Keywords: aging; bed rest; endothelium; microgravity; pre-nosological medicine; space radiation; stress response; visual acuity
Year: 2017 PMID: 28824446 PMCID: PMC5539130 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Updated list of ESA-sponsored bed rest campaigns since 2000.
| LTBR 01-02 | 2001/2002 | Toulouse, 25 males | 15 | 90 | 15 | 1) Flywheel exercise 2) Bisphosphonate | −6° |
| STBR 01-02 | 2001/2002 | Cologne, 9 males. Cross-over | 9 | 14 | 3 | Caloric variations in nutrition, Amino acid infusion | −6° |
| BBR | 2003/2004 | Berlin, 20 males | 3 | 56 | 6 | Vibration exercise | 0° |
| WISE | 2005 | Toulouse, 24 females | 20 | 60 | 20 | 1) Combined resistive exercise, aerobic exercise, Lower Body Negative Pressure 2) Nutritional supplement | −6° |
| BBR2-2 | 2007/2008 | Berlin, 24 males | 9 | 60 | 7 | 1) High-load resistive exercise (RE) 2) RE+ whole-body vibration | −6° |
| BR-AG1 | 2010 | Toulouse, 12 males Cross-over | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1) Artificial gravity by daily short-arm centrifuge for: 30 min 2) Intermittent 6x 5 min | −6° |
| SAG | 2010/2011 | Cologne, 10 males Cross-over | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1) Locomotion replacement training 2) Upright standing | −6° |
| MEP | 2011/2012 | Cologne, 10 males Cross-over | 7 | 21 | 6 | Combined supplementation of 0.6 g whey protein (WP)/kg body weight (BW) and 90 mmol potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3) | −6° |
| MNX | 2012/2013 | Toulouse, 12 males Cross-over | 7 | 6 | 1) Resistive Vibration Exercise (RVE) 2) RVE + Nutritional Supplement | −6° | |
| RSL | 2015/2016 | Cologne, 24 males | 14 | 60 | 14 | Reactive jump | −6° |
| TBD | 2017/2018 | Toulouse, 20 males | 14 | 60 | 14 | Cocktail | −6° |
TBD, to be defined; d, duration (days) of the different bed rest phases (PRE, before; HDT, head-down tilt; POST, after HDBR). Cross-over, subjects repeated the study, first in the control group, then in the countermeasure one.