| Literature DB >> 28822499 |
Abstract
Payment reform has been at the forefront of the movement toward higher-value care in the U.S. health care system. A common belief is that volume-based incentives embedded in fee-for-service need to be replaced with value-based payments. While this belief is well-intended, value-based payment also contains perverse incentives. In particular, behavioral economists have identified several features of individual decision making that reverse some of the typical recommendations for inducing desirable behavior through financial incentives. This paper discusses the countervailing incentives associated with four behavioral economic concepts: loss aversion, relative social ranking, inertia or status quo bias, and extrinsic vs. intrinsic motivation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28822499 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.04.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthc (Amst) ISSN: 2213-0764