Literature DB >> 31421341

Association of self-reported personal care product use with blood glucose levels measured during pregnancy among women from a fertility clinic.

Andrea Bellavia1, Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón2, Jennifer B Ford2, Myra Keller2, John Petrozza3, Paige L Williams4, Russ Hauser5, Tamarra James-Todd5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Personal care products (PCPs), known sources of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) such as phthalates and parabens, are widely used among women of reproductive age. EDCs have been linked to pregnancy complications such as gestational diabetes (GDM), and PCP use could represent a modifiable source of exposure in this sensitive time window. Yet, to our knowledge, no study has directly evaluated the association between pregnancy use of PCP and late pregnancy glucose levels, established risk factors for complications such as GDM.
METHODS: A total of 233 women from the Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study had data available on 1st and/or 2nd trimester PCP use, assessed through self-reported use over the previous 24 h, and blood glucose levels after the glucose loading test (GLT), taken at late 2nd trimester. Associations between each individual PCP and total PCP with glucose levels were evaluated in multivariable adjusted linear regression models.
RESULTS: Both positive and negative differences in glucose levels were observed when comparing users vs. non-users of several PCPs including 2nd trimester use of deodorant (adjusted mean difference: 12.2 mg/dL, 95% CI: -0.6, 24.9); bar soap (6.9 mg/dL, 95% CI: -0.9, 14.7 mg/dL); and liquid soap (-13.3, 95% CI: -26.8, 0.1 mg/dL), and 1st trimester use of sunscreen (-14.6 mg/dL, 95% CI: -27.8, -1.5 mg/dL). Total number of PCPs used in the 2nd trimester was also associated with higher glucose levels, with the largest difference of 20 mg/dL when comparing individuals who used eight vs none PCPs (95% CI: 3-37).
CONCLUSIONS: In a pregnancy cohort of women seeking care at a fertility clinic, we found the use of several PCPs to be positively or negatively associated with glucose levels in the late second trimester, which may reflect increased risk of GDM and subsequent perinatal outcomes. These results strengthen the role of product use as a potentially modifiable source of EDCs that may impact glucose levels.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endocrine disruptors; Environmental reproductive epidemiology; Pregnancy cohort; Sources of exposure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31421341      PMCID: PMC6868339          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  31 in total

1.  Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes.

Authors:  M W Carpenter; D R Coustan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Women's exposure to phthalates in relation to use of personal care products.

Authors:  Lauren E Parlett; Antonia M Calafat; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Pregnancy urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and gestational diabetes risk factors.

Authors:  Tamarra M James-Todd; John D Meeker; Tianyi Huang; Russ Hauser; Kelly K Ferguson; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Thomas F McElrath; Ellen W Seely
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Childhood hair product use and earlier age at menarche in a racially diverse study population: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tamarra James-Todd; Mary Beth Terry; Janet Rich-Edwards; Andrea Deierlein; Ruby Senie
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 5.  Endocrine Disruptors: A Potential Risk Factor for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Shelley Ehrlich; Donna Lambers; Andrea Baccarelli; Jane Khoury; Maurizio Macaluso; Shuk-Mei Ho
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Personal care product use and urinary phthalate metabolite and paraben concentrations during pregnancy among women from a fertility clinic.

Authors:  Joe M Braun; Allan C Just; Paige L Williams; Kristen W Smith; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Urinary concentrations of parabens mixture and pregnancy glucose levels among women from a fertility clinic.

Authors:  Andrea Bellavia; Yu-Han Chiu; Florence M Brown; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Jennifer B Ford; Myra Keller; John Petrozza; Paige L Williams; Xiaoyun Ye; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Tamarra James-Todd
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Exposure to phthalates and phenols during pregnancy and offspring size at birth.

Authors:  Claire Philippat; Marion Mortamais; Cécile Chevrier; Claire Petit; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Manori J Silva; Christian Brambilla; Isabelle Pin; Marie-Aline Charles; Sylvaine Cordier; Rémy Slama
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Personal Care Product Use in Men and Urinary Concentrations of Select Phthalate Metabolites and Parabens: Results from the Environment And Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study.

Authors:  Feiby L Nassan; Brent A Coull; Audrey J Gaskins; Michelle A Williams; Niels E Skakkebaek; Jennifer B Ford; Xiaoyun Ye; Antonia M Calafat; Joseph M Braun; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Trimester-specific phthalate concentrations and glucose levels among women from a fertility clinic.

Authors:  Tamarra M James-Todd; Yu-Han Chiu; Carmen Messerlian; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Jennifer B Ford; Myra Keller; John Petrozza; Paige L Williams; Xiaoyun Ye; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  4 in total

1.  Personal Care and Household Cleaning Product Use among Pregnant Women and New Mothers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Andrea L Deierlein; Alexis R Grayon; Xiaotong Zhu; Yanwen Sun; Xun Liu; Kaelyn Kohlasch; Cheryl R Stein
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dandan Yan; Yang Jiao; Honglin Yan; Tian Liu; Hong Yan; Jingping Yuan
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 7.123

Review 3.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pregnancy and Prenatal Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Commonly Used in Personal Care Products.

Authors:  Marissa Chan; Carol Mita; Andrea Bellavia; Michaiah Parker; Tamarra James-Todd
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-05-27

4.  Heavy is the Head That Wears the Crown: Black Men's Perspective on Harmful Effects of Black Women's Hair Product Use and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Dede K Teteh; Marissa Chan; Bing Turner; Brian Hedgeman; Marissa Ericson; Phyllis Clark; Eudora Mitchell; Emily Barrett; Adana Llanos; Rick Kittles; Susanne Montgomery
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.