| Literature DB >> 28821301 |
David Casero1, Kirandeep Gill2, Vijayalakshmi Sridharan3, Igor Koturbash4, Gregory Nelson5, Martin Hauer-Jensen3, Marjan Boerma3, Jonathan Braun1, Amrita K Cheema6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Space travel is associated with continuous low dose rate exposure to high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. Pathophysiological manifestations after low dose radiation exposure are strongly influenced by non-cytocidal radiation effects, including changes in the microbiome and host gene expression. Although the importance of the gut microbiome in the maintenance of human health is well established, little is known about the role of radiation in altering the microbiome during deep-space travel.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing; Ionizing radiation; Metabolic network modeling; Microbiome; Space travel; Untargeted metabolomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28821301 PMCID: PMC5563039 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-017-0325-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1Experimental and analytical design. Fecal samples were collected from irradiated mice and processed for both 16S rRNA amplicon and LC-MS profiling. 16S rRNA amplicon data was analyzed at the phylotype level unless stated otherwise. Constrained Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP) provided condition-specific phylotypes and metabolites, while model-based clustering produced a classification of highly responsive phylotypes based on overall response to irradiation. The predicted metagenome was employed to estimate contributions of bacterial phylotypes to significant functional shifts and community-wide metabolic potential (CMP) scores. Metabolic network modeling was used to integrate the 16S rRNA amplicon and metabolomics data and to establish significant associations between phylotypes and metabolic shifts
Fig. 2Ecological analysis of the irradiated microbiome. a Alpha diversity for control and irradiated samples 10 (red) and 30 (blue) days post-radiation. Shown are per-sample (dots), and per-condition averages (line plots), and standard deviations (gray bands). Values correspond to Faith’s phylogenetic diversity metric (PD). b Jackknifed Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) plot of UniFrac unweighted distances between sample groups. For each sample, shown are confidence ellipses obtained from independent random rarefactions of the OTU counts table. c Barplots of per-condition relative abundances (logarithmic scale) for bacterial families with significant variations across conditions (Bonferroni p value < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test). d Heatmap of phylotype-level counts. All samples (columns) are shown and grouped by experimental factors. Individual phylotypes (rows) are grouped at the family level
Fig. 3Phylotype-level classification of the irradiated microbiome. a Model-based clustering of phylotypes based on overall abundance profiles. Shown are clusters enriched in specific taxonomic groups (hypergeometric p value < 0.05). Full results are provided in Additional file 4: Figure S2a. Line plots represent the average abundance profile for all phylotypes classified in each cluster. b Heatmap of per-group indicator values (distance-based Redundancy Analysis; db-RDA) for selected condition-specific phylotypes. Labels represent higher-order taxonomic levels of those phylotypes for greater clarity (gnavu = Ruminococcus gnavus). c Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for selected conditions and condition-specific taxa. TP = true positive rate, FP = false positive rate, AUC = area under the curve
Fig. 4Functional shifts within the irradiated microbiome. a Summary of significant functional shifts predicted by the FishTaco approach. For each KEGG pathway and each dose, shown is the magnitude W (Wilcoxon test statistics, highlighted by color and proportional to circle size) of the predicted functional shift with respect to time-matched, non-radiated controls. Net positive shifts (red) refer to higher pathway activity in irradiated samples. Net negative shifts (green) are the result of lower pathway activity in irradiated samples. b Deconvolution of significant community-wide functional shifts into individual taxonomic contributions. Only explicit contributions (taxa with enzymatic activity in the pathway) are shown for greater clarity. For each example, the top barplot represents relative contributions to net functional shifts in (a) for all to taxa with higher abundance in irradiated samples (resp. lower for bottom barplot)
Fig. 5Metabolic classifiers and shifts within the irradiated metabolome. a Heatmap of per-group indicator values (distance-based redundancy analysis; db-RDA) for selected condition-specific features. The total number of condition-specific features (out of a total of ~ 4500) is highlighted. b Enrichment analysis of condition-specific putatively annotated metabolites in metabolite classes from the HMDB chemical taxonomy database. Over-represented classes (red) are those with higher relative presence in the set of condition-specific metabolites as compared to the entire metabolomics dataset (respectively lower for under-represented classes in green). Circle size is proportional to the (unsigned) fold ratio between those relative abundances
Fig. 6Metabolic network modeling and taxa-metabolite associations. Multi-omics (16S and LC-MS) data integration was performed under the Predicted Relative Metabolic Turnover (PRMT) framework. a Network visualization of significant associations between well-predicted metabolites (Mantel p value < 0.01 and FDR < 0.01, a total of 259 compounds) and bacterial phylotypes with a significant contribution to community-wide CMP scores (correlation between individual and community-wide CMP scores > 0.5 for a given metabolite, a total of 265 phylotypes). Node size is proportional to the relative abundance of the corresponding metabolite (from LC-MS) or phylotype (from 16S amplicon data). Edge width is proportional to the strength of association between each metabolite-phylotype pair (as measured by the correlation above). Highlighted are examples of well-predicted metabolites with significant agreement between experimental and predicted relative abundances and their association with specific phylotypes. b For each well-predicted metabolite highlighted in (a): solid barplots represent actual relative abundances (LC-MS); hollow barplots represent “predicted” relative abundances (CMP scores); red scatterplot for ubiquinol shows the correlation between actual and predicted relative abundances across all samples; green scatterplots show the correlation between community-wide and individual taxa contributions to predicted relative abundances, for taxa classified as key drivers of variations in metabolite relative abundances