Literature DB >> 28820839

Smaller Diameter Anastomotic Coupling Devices Have Higher Rates of Venous Thrombosis in Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer.

Summer E Hanson1, Matthew B Mitchell, Nihanth Palivela, S Andrew Peng, Lei Feng, Rene D Largo, Charles E Butler, Patrick B Garvey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smaller anastomotic coupling devices may increase the risk of complications in free flap reconstructions; however, the relationship between coupler size and venous thrombosis rates has not been adequately evaluated. The authors hypothesized that smaller diameter coupling devices are associated with higher rates of venous thrombosis than larger diameter devices in free tissue transfer.
METHODS: The authors reviewed a prospectively maintained database for all patients who underwent microsurgical free tissue transfer at their institution from 2001 to 2013. The primary outcome measured was venous thrombosis, and the primary objective was to assess the relationship between venous coupler diameter and the rate of venous thrombosis. The secondary objective was to compare venous thrombosis rates between coupled and hand-sewn venous anastomoses.
RESULTS: A total of 5643 consecutive free flap reconstructions were evaluated; 3257 (57.7 percent) had coupled venous anastomoses. The 1.5-mm-diameter coupler had an overall thrombosis rate of 6.9 percent, significantly higher than that of all other coupler sizes (p = 0.04). In multivariable regression with generalized estimating equations analysis, both use of a 1.5-mm coupler (OR, 7.75; 95 percent CI, 3.20 to 18.76; p < 0.0001) and preoperative radiation therapy (OR, 1.62; 95 percent CI, 1.04 to 2.52; p = 0.03) were significant independent predictors of venous thrombosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors found a significantly higher rate of venous thrombosis with the 1.5-mm-diameter coupler than with larger diameter devices or hand-sewn venous anastomoses. This evidence suggests that surgeons should choose an outflow vessel that does not require a coupler diameter smaller than 2.0 mm or perform a hand-sewn anastomosis in situations where this is not possible. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28820839     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  3 in total

1.  Venous Coupler in Pediatric Free Tissue Transfer: Case Series and Literature Review.

Authors:  Salah Aldekhayel; Feras Alshomer; Bushra Alhazmi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-26

Review 2.  Is there a difference in venous thrombosis rate in free flap anastomoses based on coupler diameter? A systematic review. Does Size Really Matter?

Authors:  D D Krijgh; B Tellier; T Teunis; W Maarse; J H Coert
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-08-11

3.  Mechanical Anastomotic Coupling Device versus Hand-sewn Venous Anastomosis in Head and Neck Reconstruction-An Analysis of 1694 Venous Anastomoses.

Authors:  Rajan Arora; Kripa Shanker Mishra; Hemant T Bhoye; Ajay Kumar Dewan; Ravi K Singh; Ravikiran Naalla
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.