Literature DB >> 28819810

Laser-assisted surgery of the upper aero-digestive tract: a clarification of nomenclature. A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society.

Marc Remacle1, Christoph Arens2, Mostafa Badr Eldin3, Guillermo Campos4, Carlos Chiesa Estomba5, Pavel Dulguerov6, Ivana Fiz7, Anastasios Hantzakos8, Jerôme Keghian9, Francesco Mora10, Nayla Matar11, Giorgio Peretti10, Cesare Piazza12, Gregory N Postma13, Vyas Prasad14, Elisabeth Sjogren15, Frederik G Dikkers16.   

Abstract

Acronyms and abbreviations are frequently used in otorhinolaryngology and other medical specialties. CO2 laser-assisted transoral surgery of the pharynx, the larynx and the upper airway is a family of commonly performed surgical procedures termed transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). The abbreviation TLM can be confusing because of alternative modes of delivery. Classification and definition of the different types of procedures, performed transorally or transnasally, are proposed by the Working Committee for Nomenclature of the European Laryngological Society, emphasizing the type of laser used and the way this laser is transmitted. What is usually called TLM, would more clearly be defined as CO2 laser transoral microsurgery or CO2 TOLMS or CO2 laser transoral surgery only (with a handpiece) would be defined as CO2 TOLS. KTP transnasal flexible laser surgery would be KTP TNFLS. Transoral use of the flexible CO2 wave-guide with a handpiece would be a CO2 TOFLS. One can argue that these clarifications are not necessary and that the abbreviation TLM for transoral laser microsurgery is more than sufficient. But this is not the case. Laser surgery, office-based laser surgery and microsurgery are frequently and erroneously interchanged for one another. These classifications allow for a clear understanding of what was performed and what the results meant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laser-assisted surgery; Nomenclature; TNFLS; TOFLS; TOLMS; TOLS; Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28819810      PMCID: PMC5758682          DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4708-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


Introduction

Acronyms and abbreviations are frequently used in otorhinolaryngology and other medical specialties: PTSD for post-traumatic stress disorder, FNA for fine needle aspiration, FESS for functional endoscopic sinus surgery, and FEES for flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, and finally LASER itself means light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation. CO2 laser-assisted transoral surgery of the pharynx, the larynx and the upper airway is a family of commonly performed surgical procedures termed transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) [1]. TLM was initially intended, for the treatment of early laryngeal and pharyngeal cancers, using the CO2 laser straight beam in combination with a surgical microscope. Recent advances and refinements of laser tools and surgical techniques now make it possible to use lasers, delivered through different methods, for advanced carcinomas, microendoscopic laryngotracheal reconstruction, treatment of recurrent respiratory papillomas and phonomicrosurgery. The abbreviation TLM can be confusing because of alternative modes of delivery. Wave-guides made of a pliable hollow glass-tube covered inside with a metallic alloy have been designed to be used to direct the CO2 laser beam transorally with a handpiece or transnasally through flexible endoscopes [2]. Also, fiber-guided lasers like KTP (potassium titanyl phosphate) or thulium can also be used transnasally through the operative channel of a video endoscope [3-5]. The authors, members of the Working Committee for Nomenclature of the European Laryngological Society (ELS), propose a classification and definition of the different types of procedures, performed transorally or transnasally, emphasizing the type of laser used and the way this laser is transmitted. Only the pharynx and larynx are concerned in this ELS classification and not the ear.

Materials and methods

Our proposition is to define three separate domains for laser-assisted surgery of the larynx and pharynx: the approach, the laser in use and the way the laser beam is transmitted.

Approach

The approach can be either transnasal (TN) or transoral (TO). In rare specific cases a different approach might be possible, but it seems unnecessary to include these rare approaches in a general classification scheme.

The laser in use

The most frequently used laser in otolaryngology is the CO2 (carbon dioxide) laser. Other lasers used are the KTP (potassium titanyl phosphate), TH (thulium), LD (laser diode), PDL (pulsed dye laser), or Nd:YAG laser (Neodymium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet), just to name a few. In a classification system, there should be no doubt as to what kind of laser has been used. Therefore, the most frequently used acronym in the literature should be applied in each case or otherwise clearly specified.

The way the laser beam is transmitted

The laser can be transmitted to the target using different optical devices. Two surgical modalities are most frequently used. The first is microsurgery in which a straight laser beam is directed via a microscope through a micromanipulator. The second modality is performing flexible laser surgery, using flexible fibers to deliver lasers like KTP or the CO2 wave-guide. A third modality, using a rigid CO2 laser handpiece with either a straight beam or reflecting handpiece can be employed for surgery under direct illumination and vision or with rigid endoscopic assistance (e.g., laser ablation of tonsils). In this manner, what is usually called TLM, would more clearly be defined as CO2 laser transoral microsurgery or CO2 TOLMS (Fig. 1) or CO2 laser transoral surgery only (with a handpiece) would be defined as CO2 TOLS (Fig. 2). KTP transnasal flexible laser surgery would be KTP TNFLS (Fig. 3). Transoral use of the flexible CO2 wave-guide with a handpiece would be a CO2 TOFLS (Fig. 4a, b). In the case of CO2 TOLFS, what is important to consider is the fact that the CO2 fiber is used transorally that can be under microscope or rigid telescope visualisation.
Fig. 1

CO2 Transoral laser microsurgery or CO2 TOLMS

Fig. 2

CO2 Transoral laser surgery or CO2 TOLS

Fig. 3

CO2 Transnasal flexible laser surgery or CO2 TNFLS

Fig. 4

CO2 Transoral flexible laser surgery or CO2 TOFLS. a With microscope. b With rigid telescope

CO2 Transoral laser microsurgery or CO2 TOLMS CO2 Transoral laser surgery or CO2 TOLS CO2 Transnasal flexible laser surgery or CO2 TNFLS CO2 Transoral flexible laser surgery or CO2 TOFLS. a With microscope. b With rigid telescope Table 1 summarizes how the proposed classification system works.
Table 1

Some domains and modalities and abbreviations to be mentioned in structural abbreviations of laser-assisted surgery of the upper aero-digestive tract

DomainsModality 1Modality 2Modality 3Modality 4Modality 5Modality 6
Laser in useCO2 KTP (potassium titanyl phosphate)LD (laser diode)PDL (pulsed dye laser)TH (Thullium)Nd:YAG laser (Neodymium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet)
ApproachTOTransoralTNTransnasal
The way the laser beam is transmittedLMSMicrosurgery with a straight laser beam connected to a microscope via a micromanipulatorFLSFlexible laser surgery using fiber-guided lasersLSWith a rigid handpiece
Some domains and modalities and abbreviations to be mentioned in structural abbreviations of laser-assisted surgery of the upper aero-digestive tract

Discussion

One can argue that these clarifications are not necessary and that the abbreviation TLM for transoral laser microsurgery is more than sufficient. But this is not the case. Without a clear definition the M of TLM is refereing the use of a microscope. But as other approaches are more and more used, a classification as clear as possible is necessary. Laser surgery, office-based laser surgery and microsurgery are frequently and erroneously interchanged for one another during presentations and even in some articles [6, 7], with people confusing the tool, the approach, and the setting. Lasers of various wavelengths are a different way to interact with tissues during a surgical procedure, just as with cold steel instruments, and the approach might be endoscopic, transnasal or transoral. If all the parameters, settings and tools are not clearly specified, unintended confusion may result in difficulty reproducing results from a given institution. More importantly, it could lead to adverse clinical outcomes for a patient being treated by less experienced surgeons. The indications, expected results, laser parameters and type of anesthesia may vary greatly according to the approach and it is important that our nomenclature be accurate and flexible as new lasers and delivery systems are developed. It is highly likely that the type of laser being used is not clearly mentioned. This is frequently the case with the CO2 laser given its popularity. As such, we would then abbreviate transoral laser microsurgery as TOLMS, transnasal flexible laser surgery as TNFLS or transoral flexible laser surgery as TOFLS, preceded by the type of laser used to perform the procedure. Consequently, the location, i.e., operating room or office; the type of anesthesia: general, sedation, awake with topical anesthesia/no sedation should be reported. If other surgical instruments like microelectrodes [8] are used instead of lasers, the abbreviation can be modified accordingly: METOM for microelectrodes transoral microsurgery. As this was already true with the TLM, different instruments and optics are used during laser-assisted surgeries: forceps, cold steel scissor, monopolar aspiration–coagulation, etc. This is beyond classification. It is the role of every author to using this classification in the future for presentation of his/her results to report the complementary instrumentation if needed. We are aware that there may possibly be some degree of reticence about the proposal of this new system, as it was the case when the classifications for transoral cordectomies and supraglottic laryngectomies were proposed some years ago [9, 10]. Many authors and practitioners finally adopted these classifications because they allowed for a clear understanding of what was performed and what the results meant and they are now readily accepted.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Working Committee for Nomenclature of the European Laryngological Society proposes this new and more precise classification system for laser-assisted surgery of the upper aero-digestive tract and we would recommend that this nomenclature system be used for all publications and presentations.
  10 in total

1.  Endoscopic cordectomy. A proposal for a classification by the Working Committee, European Laryngological Society.

Authors:  M Remacle; H E Eckel; A Antonelli; D Brasnu; D Chevalier; G Friedrich; J Olofsson; H H Rudert; W Thumfart; M de Vincentiis; T P Wustrow
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A new device for treating laryngeal carcinoma using microdissection electrodes.

Authors:  Jorge Basterra; Soledad Frías; Jose R Alba; Enrique Zapater
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 3.  Office-based laryngeal laser surgery with local anesthesia.

Authors:  Steven M Zeitels; James A Burns
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Endoscopic supraglottic laryngectomy: a proposal for a classification by the working committee on nomenclature, European Laryngological Society.

Authors:  Marc Remacle; Anastasios Hantzakos; Hans Eckel; Anne-Sophie Evrard; Patrick J Bradley; Dominique Chevalier; Vojko Djukic; Marco de Vincentiis; Gerhard Friedrich; Jan Olofsson; Giorgio Peretti; Miquel Quer; Jochen Werner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Comparison of vocal outcomes after angiolytic laser surgery and microflap surgery for vocal polyps.

Authors:  Masanobu Mizuta; Nao Hiwatashi; Toshiki Kobayashi; Mami Kaneko; Ichiro Tateya; Shigeru Hirano
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 1.863

6.  Office-based 532-nm pulsed KTP laser treatment of glottal papillomatosis and dysplasia.

Authors:  Steven M Zeitels; Lee M Akst; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman; Matthew S Broadhurst; R Rox Anderson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Reliability and efficacy of a new CO2 laser hollow fiber: a prospective study of 39 patients.

Authors:  Marc Remacle; Andrea Ricci-Maccarini; Nayla Matar; Georges Lawson; Flavio Pieri; Vincent Bachy; Marie-Cécile Nollevaux
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Office-based laryngeal laser surgery: a review of 443 cases using three wavelengths.

Authors:  Jamie A Koufman; Catherine J Rees; William D Frazier; Lauren A Kilpatrick; S Carter Wright; Stacey L Halum; Gregory N Postma
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Impact of anterior commissure involvement on local control of early glottic carcinoma treated by laser microresection.

Authors:  Wolfgang Steiner; Petra Ambrosch; Ralph M W Rödel; Martina Kron
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Comparison of effects on voice of diode laser and cold knife microlaryngology techniques for vocal fold polyps.

Authors:  Mehmet Fatih Karasu; Ramazan Gundogdu; Sedat Cagli; Mesut Aydin; Turan Arli; Samet Aydemir; Imdat Yuce
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.009

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Transoral laser microsurgery: feasibility of a new exoscopic HD-3D system coupled with free beam or fiber laser.

Authors:  Andrea Luigi Camillo Carobbio; Francesco Missale; Marco Fragale; Francesco Mora; Luca Guastini; Giampiero Parrinello; Frank Rikki Mauritz Canevari; Giorgio Peretti; Leonardo S Mattos
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  How we improve the transoral resection for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: the CO2 waveguide laser.

Authors:  G Tirelli; F Boscolo Nata; R Bussani; A Gatto; E Quatela; S Rigo; M Piovesana
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Modified approach of the anterior commissure for transoral cordectomy in case of difficult exposure: a surgical innovation.

Authors:  Alexia Mattei; Carole Boulze; Laure Santini; Matthieu Le Flem; Patrick Dessi; Nicolas Fakhry; Antoine Giovanni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Transoral flexible laser surgery of the upper aerodigestive tract with blue laser.

Authors:  Guillermo Campos; Oswaldo Amaya; Juliana Valencia; Laura Arango
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.236

5.  Laser debulking or tracheotomy in airway management prior to total laryngectomy for T4a laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Djamil Semdaie; Fabienne Haroun; Odile Casiraghi; François Bidault; Stéphane Temam; François Janot; Philippe Gorphe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  CO2 Transoral Laser Microsurgery in Benign, Premalignant and Malignant (Tis, T1, T2) Lesion of the Glottis. A Literature Review.

Authors:  Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba; Jose Angel González-García; Ekhiñe Larruscain; Christian Calvo-Henríquez; Miguel Mayo-Yáñez; Jon A Sistiaga-Suarez
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-22

7.  Scanning Super/Ultrapulsed CO2 Laser Efficacy in Laryngeal Malignant Lesions.

Authors:  Stefano Dallari; Luca Giannoni; Alessandra Filosa
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Salvage carbon dioxide transoral laser microsurgery for laryngeal cancer after (chemo)radiotherapy: a European Laryngological Society consensus statement.

Authors:  Cesare Piazza; Alberto Paderno; Elisabeth V Sjogren; Patrick J Bradley; Hans E Eckel; Antti Mäkitie; Nayla Matar; Vinidh Paleri; Giorgio Peretti; Roberto Puxeddu; Miquel Quer; Marc Remacle; Vincent Vander Poorten; Isabel Vilaseca; Ricard Simo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Transoral Laser Microsurgery for Glottic Cancer in Patients Over 75 Years Old.

Authors:  Alberto Paderno; Davide Lancini; Paolo Bosio; Francesca Del Bon; Milena Fior; Giulia Berretti; Marco Alparone; Alberto Deganello; Giorgio Peretti; Cesare Piazza
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.970

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.