Literature DB >> 25933587

Comparison of vocal outcomes after angiolytic laser surgery and microflap surgery for vocal polyps.

Masanobu Mizuta1, Nao Hiwatashi1, Toshiki Kobayashi1, Mami Kaneko1, Ichiro Tateya1, Shigeru Hirano2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The microflap technique is a standard procedure for the treatment of vocal fold polyps. Angiolytic laser surgery carried out under topical anesthesia is an alternative method for vocal polyp removal. However, it is not clear whether angiolytic laser surgery has the same effects on vocal outcomes as the microflap technique because of a lack of studies comparing both procedures. In the current study, vocal outcomes after both procedures were compared to clarify the effects of angiolytic laser surgery for vocal polyp removal.
METHODS: Vocal outcomes were reviewed for patients who underwent angiolytic laser surgery (n=20, laser group) or microflap surgery (n=34, microflap group) for vocal polyp removal. The data analyzed included patient and lesion characteristics, number of surgeries required for complete resolution, and aerodynamic and acoustic examinations before and after surgery.
RESULTS: In the laser surgery group, complete resolution of the lesion was achieved with a single procedure in 17 cases (85%) and with two procedures in 3 cases (15%). Postoperative aerodynamic and acoustic parameters demonstrated significant improvement compared to preoperative parameters in both the laser surgery group and the microflap surgery group. There were no significant differences in any postoperative aerodynamic and acoustic parameters between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The current retrospective study demonstrated that angiolytic laser surgery achieved complete resolution of vocal polyps within two procedures. Postoperative effects on aerodynamic and acoustic functions were similar to those after microflap surgery.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiolytic laser surgery; Microflap surgery; Vocal outcome; Vocal polyp

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25933587     DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2015.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx        ISSN: 0385-8146            Impact factor:   1.863


  4 in total

1.  Treatment Outcomes and Adverse Events Following In-Office Angiolytic Laser With or Without Concurrent Polypectomy for Vocal Fold Polyps.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan Lin; Chi-Te Wang; Feng-Chuan Lin; Li-Jen Liao; Wu-Chia Lo; Po-Wen Cheng
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Phonosurgery of Reinke's edema with microdebrider.

Authors:  Egle Grigaliute; Maria Novella Fiamingo; Pasquale Gianluca Albanese; Ignazio La Mantia
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.236

3.  Laser-assisted surgery of the upper aero-digestive tract: a clarification of nomenclature. A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society.

Authors:  Marc Remacle; Christoph Arens; Mostafa Badr Eldin; Guillermo Campos; Carlos Chiesa Estomba; Pavel Dulguerov; Ivana Fiz; Anastasios Hantzakos; Jerôme Keghian; Francesco Mora; Nayla Matar; Giorgio Peretti; Cesare Piazza; Gregory N Postma; Vyas Prasad; Elisabeth Sjogren; Frederik G Dikkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Comparison of the efficacy of vocal training and vocal microsurgery in patients with early vocal fold polyp.

Authors:  Hanqing Wang; Pan Zhuge; Huihua You; Yulan Zhang; Zhifeng Zhang
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.