Literature DB >> 28815603

Registration of phase-contrast images in propagation-based X-ray phase tomography.

L Weber1,2,3, A Hänsch1, U Wolfram4, A Pacureanu2, P Cloetens2, F Peyrin1,2, S Rit1, M Langer1.   

Abstract

X-ray phase tomography aims at reconstructing the 3D electron density distribution of an object. It offers enhanced sensitivity compared to attenuation-based X-ray absorption tomography. In propagation-based methods, phase contrast is achieved by letting the beam propagate after interaction with the object. The phase shift is then retrieved at each projection angle, and subsequently used in tomographic reconstruction to obtain the refractive index decrement distribution, which is proportional to the electron density. Accurate phase retrieval is achieved by combining images at different propagation distances. For reconstructions of good quality, the phase-contrast images recorded at different distances need to be accurately aligned. In this work, we characterise the artefacts related to misalignment of the phase-contrast images, and investigate the use of different registration algorithms for aligning in-line phase-contrast images. The characterisation of artefacts is done by a simulation study and comparison with experimental data. Loss in resolution due to vibrations is found to be comparable to attenuation-based computed tomography. Further, it is shown that registration of phase-contrast images is nontrivial due to the difference in contrast between the different images, and the often periodical artefacts present in the phase-contrast images if multilayer X-ray optics are used. To address this, we compared two registration algorithms for aligning phase-contrast images acquired by magnified X-ray nanotomography: one based on cross-correlation and one based on mutual information. We found that the mutual information-based registration algorithm was more robust than a correlation-based method.
© 2017 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2017 Royal Microscopical Society.

Keywords:  Artefacts; X-ray imaging; nanotomography; phase tomography; registration; simulation

Year:  2017        PMID: 28815603     DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microsc        ISSN: 0022-2720            Impact factor:   1.758


  3 in total

1.  Nonlinear statistical iterative reconstruction for propagation-based phase-contrast tomography.

Authors:  Lorenz Hehn; Kaye Morgan; Pidassa Bidola; Wolfgang Noichl; Regine Gradl; Martin Dierolf; Peter B Noël; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2018-01-23

2.  X-ray Phase Contrast osteo-articular imaging: a pilot study on cadaveric human hands.

Authors:  Hélène Rougé-Labriet; Sebastien Berujon; Hervé Mathieu; Sylvain Bohic; Barbara Fayard; Jean-Noel Ravey; Yohann Robert; Philippe Gaudin; Emmanuel Brun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  X-ray in-line holography and holotomography at the NanoMAX beamline.

Authors:  Sebastian Kalbfleisch; Yuhe Zhang; Maik Kahnt; Khachiwan Buakor; Max Langer; Till Dreier; Hanna Dierks; Philip Stjärneblad; Emanuel Larsson; Korneliya Gordeyeva; Lert Chayanun; Daniel Söderberg; Jesper Wallentin; Martin Bech; Pablo Villanueva-Perez
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.616

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.