Literature DB >> 28815070

Supracarinal dissection of the oesophagus and lymphadenectomy by MIE.

Harushi Osugi1, Kousuke Narumiya1, Kenji Kudou1.   

Abstract

Since 1995, video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy (VATS), according the same surgical principles as the Japanese open surgery, has been completed in 700 patients with oesophageal cancer. Our indication for VATS is (I) no extensive pleural adhesion; (II) no contiguous tumor spread; (III) pulmonary function capable of sustaining single-lung ventilation, and (IV) non radiated patients. We use 4 ports around a 5 cm mini-thoracotomy on 5th intercostal space. We laid emphasis on utilizing magnifying effect of video (5 to 20 magnifications), obtained by positioning the camera at close vicinity to the dissection. Magnified view facilitates recognizing the fine layer structure of the mediastinum. The dissection should be performed following this layer structure just like open the page of a book. Tearing the layer makes the dissection irrational and cause unnecessary bleeding and invasiveness. The microanatomies we recognize during upper mediastinal dissection are (I) the most outer layer below the mediastinal pleura are branches from the vagus nerve and thoracic sympathetic trunk; (II) there is no vessel flow in the nerves or out, in the field of dissection; (III) the ideal layer of dissection along the nerve is exposing the epineurium; (IV) the strongest fixing structures in the mediastinum are the vagal nerves and nerves form thoracic sympathetic trunk; (V) the stump of thoracic duct shows particular appearance because of the intramural smooth muscle; (VI) the lymphonodes in the mediastinum are fixed strongly with nerves and gently with vessels; (VII) the aorta is covered with fine fibrous membrane consisting of branches form thoracic sympathetic trunk, etc. Magnified view shows the microstructure of the lymph node such as the afferent lymphatics penetrating the capsule and the hilum structure consisting the efferent lymphatics, artery, vein and nerve. The direction of the hilum of nodes is defined in each region. Therefore, understanding the hilum direction facilitates rational dissection. The hospital mortality was four patients (0.6%). The rate of regional control was 95%. The 5-year survival rates of the patients with pStage 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 were 92%, 88%, 69%, 52% and 24%, respectively, which were favorably compared with open surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thoracoscopy; microanatomy; oesophagectomy; supracarinal dissection

Year:  2017        PMID: 28815070      PMCID: PMC5538985          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  15 in total

1.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer. A series of 75 cases.

Authors:  H Osugi; M Takemura; M Higashino; N Takada; S Lee; M Ueno; Y Tanaka; K Fukuhara; Y Hashimoto; Y Fujiwara; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results.

Authors:  H Osugi; M Takemura; M Higashino; N Takada; S Lee; M Ueno; Y Tanaka; K Fukuhara; Y Hashimoto; Y Fujiwara; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Xiao Ma; Su Yang; Xiaoli Zhu; Wei Qin; Jiaqing Xiang; Toni Lerut; Hecheng Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals.

Authors:  H Fujita; S Ozawa; H Kuwano; Y Ueda; S Hattori; T Yanagawa
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Arnold Radtke; Thomas J Musholt; Stephan Timm; Andreas Rink; Achilleas Tsiamis; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Babatunde A Yerokun; Zhifei Sun; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Brian C Gulack; Paul J Speicher; Mohamed A Adam; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis; David H Harpole; Mark F Berry; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  The importance of grouping of lymph node stations and rationale of three-field lymphoadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Harushi Udagawa; Masaki Ueno; Hisashi Shinohara; Shusuke Haruta; Sachiko Kaida; Masatoshi Nakagawa; Masahiko Tsurumaru
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc Dantoc; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08

10.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  1 in total

1.  The circRNA circADAMTS6 promotes progression of ESCC and correlates with prognosis.

Authors:  Jing Bu; Lina Gu; Xin Liu; Xixi Nan; Xiangmei Zhang; Lingjiao Meng; Yang Zheng; Fei Liu; Jiali Li; Ziyi Li; Meixiang Sang; Baoen Shan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.