| Literature DB >> 28814926 |
Emmanuel Igwaro Odongo-Aginya1, Alex Olia1, Kilama Justin Luwa2, Eiji Nagayasu3, Anna Mary Auma4, Geoffrey Egitat4, Gerald Mwesigwa4, Yoshitaka Ogino5,6, Eisaku Kimura7, Toshihiro Horii7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A prevalence study of Wuchereria bancrofti infection was carried out in 2014 at 4 study sites in northern Uganda using antigen and microfilaria tests. Each study site consists of a primary school and surrounding communities. These sites are inside the filariasis endemic area and have been covered by mass drug administration under the national elimination programme. However, no prevalence study had been conducted there before the present study. Without information on past and present endemicity levels, our study was meant to be an independent third-party investigation to know the latest filariasis situation.Entities:
Keywords: Mass drug administration; Podoconiosis; Prevalence; Uganda; Wuchereria bancrofti
Year: 2017 PMID: 28814926 PMCID: PMC5556395 DOI: 10.1186/s41182-017-0060-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Health ISSN: 1348-8945
Fig. 1Four study sites (bullet), Barromo, Goro, Oloyotong, and Labworomor, each in different four districts (underlined). The whole Uganda map is shown in the upper left
Results of W. bancrofti antigen (A) and microfilaria (B) tests according to study site which includes a primary school and surrounding communities
| Study site | Sex | Barromo | Goro | Oloyotong | Labworomor | Total exam. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. exam. | No. positive | No. exam. | No. positive | No. exam. | No. positive | No. exam. | No. positive | |||
| A | ||||||||||
| Schoolchildren (7–19 years) | M | 85 | 0 | 77 | 0 | 71 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 300 |
| F | 55 | 0 | 64 | 0 | 76 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 270 | |
| Total | 140 | 0 | 141 | 0 | 147 | 0 | 142 | 0 | 570 | |
| Community children (7–13 years) | M | 24 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 85 |
| F | 23 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 87 | |
| Total | 47 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 172 | |
| Community people (14–25 years) | M | 28 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 39 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 138 |
| F | 28 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 102 | |
| Total | 53 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 61 | 0 | 66 | 0 | 240 | |
| Community total | 100 | 0 | 117 | 0 | 98 | 0 | 97 | 0 | 412 | |
| All subjects | 240 | 0 | 258 | 0 | 245 | 0 | 239 | 0 | 982 | |
| B | ||||||||||
| Schoolchildren (7–19 years) | M | 72 | 0 | 46 | 0 | 62 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 228 |
| F | 39 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 65 | 0 | 58 | 0 | 207 | |
| Total | 111 | 0 | 91 | 0 | 127 | 0 | 106 | 0 | 435 | |
| Community children (7–13 years) | M | 19 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 66 |
| F | 17 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 62 | |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 128 | |
| Communitypeople (14–25yrs) | M | 20 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 78 |
| F | 15 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 54 | |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 132 | |
| Community total | 71 | 0 | 77 | 0 | 63 | 0 | 49 | 0 | 260 | |
| All subjects | 182 | 0 | 168 | 0 | 190 | 0 | 155 | 0 | 695 | |
In community surveys by the antigen and microfilaria tests, schoolchildren are excluded
Fig. 2Three cases (a, b, and c) with leg edema and pachydermic skin changes. In case a, the right lower leg is slightly edematous and the dorsal skin of the right foot is whitish in appearance (a1). The skin of the foot is pachydermic and mossy: the skins of the right toes are rather spiny, and the nails of the left 2nd and 3rd toes are unrecognizable (arrows) (a2). In case b, foot edema and pachydermic skin change along the side of the foot are recognized (b). Mild edema is observable in the left lower leg of case c (c1), and the skin around the left toes is pachydermic (c2)
Fig. 3Three published maps showing prevalence or endemicity of bancroftian filariasis in Uganda. Our four study sites are plotted on each map. O Oloyotong, G Goro, L Labworomor, B Barromo. a The map reported by Onapa et al. [8]. All of our four study sites are in the >5.0% endemic zone. b The map is from Global Atlas of Helminth Infections (GAHI). The original map is reported by Moraga et al. [16]. Three of our sites are in the 11–20% prevalence zone, and one in the 21–30% zone. c The map is reported by Kolaczinski et al. [17]. Three of our sites are in the districts classified as non-endemic, and one in the endemic district