| Literature DB >> 28814651 |
Dimitar Z Epihov1, Sarah A Batterman2,3, Lars O Hedin4, Jonathan R Leake5, Lisa M Smith5, David J Beerling5.
Abstract
Fossil and phylogenetic evidence indicates legume-rich modern tropicclass="Chemical">al forests reclass="Chemical">placed Late Cretaceous class="Chemical">pEntities:
Keywords: CO2 sequestration; Cenozoic; N2-fixation; legume trees; rock weathering; tropical forests
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28814651 PMCID: PMC5563791 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349
Figure 1.Global rise of legume-rich tropical forests during the early Cenozoic (58–42 Ma). (a) Global map of the major legume fossil records plotted on the Eocene continental configuration. Lines and their ball ends point to approximate locations. Caesalpinioids in the Wilcox flora are according the old pre-molecular taxonomy with a family status. DTF, dry tropical forest; SubTF, sub-tropical forest; TRF, tropical rainforest, boreotropical or BTF, a forest with mixed tropical and temperate species which is sometimes referred to as boreotropical. (b) Summary of the notable legume-rich fossil assemblages and all major molecular clock-dated crown nodes in the Leguminosae marking the rise of the legume-rich forests in the Palaeocene–Eocene plotted against atmospheric CO2 records (light blue dots and red Loess curve) using data from [19] and ocean bottom water temperature (orange semi-transparent curve) using data from [21]. Peaks in terrestrial weathering (WTs = 55, 48, 35 Ma) are estimated as levels of lateritization and bauxitization in [20]. Cjn, Cerrejon rainforest formation; Wlx, Wilcox boreotropical flora; Wy, Wyoming flora; Pat, Patagonia dry forests; Mah, Mahenge dry tropical forest; Cyn, Cynometra-monodominant stands in Mwadui; Cam, Cameroon tropical rainforest; Bjm, putative Brachystegia-Julbernardia miombo (macrofossils but not assemblage). Crown nodes include the divergence of L, Leguminosae; Pa, Papilionoideae; G, Genistoids; D, Dalbergioids; N, Senna clade; U, Umtiza clade; A, Amherstieae tribe (contains the majority EM taxa) after [23]; S, Swartzia clade; R, Robinioids; B, Mirbelioids; I, Indigoferoids; Cl, Cladrastis clade; M, Millettioids; Mi, Mimosoideae; O, Peltophorum clade; T, Trifolium (IRLC) clade; C, Cercis clade; P, Poeppigia clade; F, Fossil not supported Brachystegia clade (because fossils of Brachystegia and Julbernardia found much earlier and new estimates show that this divergence occurred 52.1 Ma—here marked as clade Amherstieae). Clock data references: all clade ages unless otherwise stated are after [9].
Figure 2.Foliar N ratios between N2-fixing and non-fixing non-legumes in (a) tropical forests, (b) tropical forestry plantations and (c) between the three functional groups and (d) pathways of the nitrogen-weathering feedback hypothesis. Red typeface depicts factors stimulating weathering with specific weathering reactions associated with those factors in brackets. In tropical forests, N2-fixing legumes exhibit an average of 34.58% (s.e.m. = 11.73%) higher leaf crude protein content than non-fixing tree species. In forestry plantations, N2-fixing legume species reveal on average 64.50% (s.e.m. = 11.57%) higher leaf crude protein content than non-fixing trees. Raw data and references are available in the electronic supplementary material. In (c), ‘n’ stands for number of species and DBM stands for dry biomass.
Figure 3.Atmospheric CO2, NPP, weathering and N feedbacks. (a) Ecosystem effects of elevated CO2 levels in legume-poor and rich forests; (b) differences in feedback relationships between rich and poor forests. In both forest types, high atmospheric CO2 levels (1) promote a proportional NPP increase (2) which transitions the system to low N-availability (3). Ultimately, in poor forests that would result in a negative feedback on NPP. In rich forests, however, low N-availability (3) can upregulate N2-fixation rates and recruitment of N2-fixers (4) thus alleviating N limitations and allowing for an unchanged CO2-NPP relationship. Green arrows indicate positive relationships, whereas red ball-ending lines—negative relationships; N2F, N2-fixation.