Literature DB >> 31420512

The efficiency paradox: How wasteful competitors forge thrifty ecosystems.

Geerat J Vermeij1.   

Abstract

Organic waste, an inevitable byproduct of metabolism, increases in amount as metabolic rates (per capita power) of animals and plants rise. Most of it is recycled within aerobic ecosystems, but some is lost to the system and is sequestered in the crust for millions of years. Here, I identify and resolve a previously overlooked paradox concerning the long-term loss of organic matter. In this efficiency paradox, high-powered species are inefficient in that they release copious waste, but the ecosystems they inhabit lose almost no organic matter. Systems occupied by more efficient low-powered species suffer greater losses because of less efficient recycling. Over Phanerozoic time, ecosystems have become more productive and increasingly efficient at retaining and redistributing organic matter even as opportunistic and highly competitive producers and consumers gained power and became less efficient. These patterns and trends are driven by natural selection at the level of individuals and coherent groups, which favors winners that are more powerful, active, and wasteful. The activities of these competitors collectively create conditions that are increasingly conducive to more efficient recycling and retention of organic matter in the ecosystem.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phanerozoic; competition; ecosystems; efficiency; metabolic power

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31420512      PMCID: PMC6731674          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1901785116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  50 in total

1.  Mineral surface control of organic carbon in black shale.

Authors:  Martin J Kennedy; David R Pevear; Ronald J Hill
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Oxygen and evolutionary patterns in the sea: onshore/offshore trends and recent recruitment of deep-sea faunas.

Authors:  D K Jacobs; D R Lindberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mangroves enhance the biomass of coral reef fish communities in the Caribbean.

Authors:  Peter J Mumby; Alasdair J Edwards; J Ernesto Arias-González; Kenyon C Lindeman; Paul G Blackwell; Angela Gall; Malgosia I Gorczynska; Alastair R Harborne; Claire L Pescod; Henk Renken; Colette C C Wabnitz; Ghislane Llewellyn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences.

Authors:  David A Wardle; Lawrence R Walker; Richard D Bardgett
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization.

Authors:  Michelle C Mack; Edward A G Schuur; M Syndonia Bret-Harte; Gaius R Shaver; F Stuart Chapin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Bioturbators enhance ecosystem function through complex biogeochemical interactions.

Authors:  Andrew M Lohrer; Simon F Thrush; Max M Gibbs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  The carbon cycle and associated redox processes through time.

Authors:  John M Hayes; Jacob R Waldbauer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Essays on science and society. Pleistocene Park: return of the mammoth's ecosystem.

Authors:  Sergey A Zimov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Giant larvacean houses: rapid carbon transport to the deep sea floor.

Authors:  Bruce H Robison; Kim R Reisenbichler; Rob E Sherlock
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Biological bulldozers and the evolution of marine benthic communities.

Authors:  C W Thayer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-02-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.