Literature DB >> 28812275

A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.

Mehdi Dadkhah1, Mohsen Kahani2, Glenn Borchardt3.   

Abstract

Peer review is the most important aspect of reputable journals. Without it, we would be unsure about whether the material published was as valid and reliable as is possible. However, with the advent of the Internet, scientific literature has now become subject to a relatively new phenomenon: fake peer reviews. Some dishonest researchers have been manipulating the peer review process to publish what are often inferior papers. There are even papers that explain how to do it. This paper discusses one of those methods and how editors can defeat it by using a special review ID. This method is easy to understand and can be added to current peer review systems easily.

Keywords:  Academic ethics; Academic misconduct; Fabricated peer review; Fake peer review; Integrity of peer review; Peer review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28812275     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9960-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  6 in total

1.  Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.

Authors:  Charlotte J Haug
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Susan A Elmore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Hackers Spy Scientists.

Authors:  Mehdi Dadkhah; Giorgio Bianciardi
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 1.411

4.  Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Aceil Al-Khatib
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Identity Theft in the Academic World Leads to Junk Science.

Authors:  Mehdi Dadkhah; Mohammad Lagzian; Glenn Borchardt
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research.

Authors:  Jeffrey Beall
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Qin-Rui Xing; Hui Wang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Vinod Ravindran; Vikas Agarwal
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.153

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.