Literature DB >> 28074375

Identity Theft in the Academic World Leads to Junk Science.

Mehdi Dadkhah1, Mohammad Lagzian2, Glenn Borchardt3.   

Abstract

In recent years, identity theft has been growing in the academic world. Cybercriminals create fake profiles for prominent scientists in attempts to manipulate the review and publishing process. Without permission, some fraudulent journals use the names of standout researchers on their editorial boards in the effort to look legitimate. This opinion piece, highlights some of the usual types of identity theft and their role in spreading junk science. Some general guidelines that editors and researchers can use against such attacks are presented.

Keywords:  Academic misconduct; Fake peer review; Identity theft; Junk science

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28074375     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9867-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  6 in total

1.  Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.

Authors:  Charlotte J Haug
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?

Authors:  R Grant Steen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Do You Ignore Information Security in Your Journal Website?

Authors:  Mehdi Dadkhah; Glenn Borchardt; Mohammad Lagzian
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Hackers Spy Scientists.

Authors:  Mehdi Dadkhah; Giorgio Bianciardi
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 1.411

5.  Rise of the predators: Business is booming in the murky global market of suspect and sham publishers and journals.

Authors:  Bryn Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research.

Authors:  Jeffrey Beall
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Academic Information Security Researchers: Hackers or Specialists?

Authors:  Mehdi Dadkhah; Mohammad Lagzian; Glenn Borchardt
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.

Authors:  Mehdi Dadkhah; Mohsen Kahani; Glenn Borchardt
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Vinod Ravindran; Vikas Agarwal
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.153

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.