BACKGROUND: Several studies have focused on the role of epicardial fat in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The main purpose of the study was to evaluate a computerized method for the quantitative analysis of epicardial fat volume (EFV) by non-contrast cardiac CT (NCT) for coronary calcium scan and coronary CT angiography (coronary CTA). METHODS: Thirty patients (61±12.5 years, 73% male, body mass index (BMI) =25.9±6.3 kg/m2) referred to our Institution for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent NCT and coronary CTA. Epicardial boundaries were traced by 2 experienced operators (operator 1, operators 2) on 3 and 6 short-axis (SA) slices. EFV was computed with a semi-automatic method using an in-house developed software based on spherical harmonic representation of the epicardial surface. In order to analyze the inter-observer variability both the Coefficient of Repeatability (CR) and Intra Class Correlation (ICC) were computed. RESULTS: The total EFV was 103.62±50.97 and 94.96±67.91 cc in NCT and coronary CTA with non-significant difference (P=0.292). CR error was 10.22 cc for operator 1 and 11.31 cc for operator 2 in NCT and 7.99 cc for operator 1 and 7.75 cc for operator 2 in coronary CTA. To analyze the inter-observer variability CR and ICC were computed. CR was 8.17 and 8.39 cc with NCT and 7.07 and 7.21 cc with CTA for 6 and 3 SA slices respectively. ICC values >0.99 were obtained in all cases. The right ventricular EFV was 67.23±31.4 and 57.41±34.3 cc for NCT and coronary CTA respectively; the corresponding values for left ventricular EFV were 38.01±19.1 and 35.27±25.9 cc. CONCLUSIONS: Both NCT and coronary CTA can be used with low intra- and inter-observer variability for computer-assisted measurements of EFV. Cardiac CT may allow a fast and reliable computation of EFV in clinical setting.
BACKGROUND: Several studies have focused on the role of epicardial fat in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The main purpose of the study was to evaluate a computerized method for the quantitative analysis of epicardial fat volume (EFV) by non-contrast cardiac CT (NCT) for coronary calcium scan and coronary CT angiography (coronary CTA). METHODS: Thirty patients (61±12.5 years, 73% male, body mass index (BMI) =25.9±6.3 kg/m2) referred to our Institution for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent NCT and coronary CTA. Epicardial boundaries were traced by 2 experienced operators (operator 1, operators 2) on 3 and 6 short-axis (SA) slices. EFV was computed with a semi-automatic method using an in-house developed software based on spherical harmonic representation of the epicardial surface. In order to analyze the inter-observer variability both the Coefficient of Repeatability (CR) and Intra Class Correlation (ICC) were computed. RESULTS: The total EFV was 103.62±50.97 and 94.96±67.91 cc in NCT and coronary CTA with non-significant difference (P=0.292). CR error was 10.22 cc for operator 1 and 11.31 cc for operator 2 in NCT and 7.99 cc for operator 1 and 7.75 cc for operator 2 in coronary CTA. To analyze the inter-observer variability CR and ICC were computed. CR was 8.17 and 8.39 cc with NCT and 7.07 and 7.21 cc with CTA for 6 and 3 SA slices respectively. ICC values >0.99 were obtained in all cases. The right ventricular EFV was 67.23±31.4 and 57.41±34.3 cc for NCT and coronary CTA respectively; the corresponding values for left ventricular EFV were 38.01±19.1 and 35.27±25.9 cc. CONCLUSIONS: Both NCT and coronary CTA can be used with low intra- and inter-observer variability for computer-assisted measurements of EFV. Cardiac CT may allow a fast and reliable computation of EFV in clinical setting.
Authors: Ryo Nakazato; Haim Shmilovich; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Victor Y Cheng; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman; Damini Dey Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2011-03-21
Authors: Jin-Won Jeong; Myung Ho Jeong; Kyeong Ho Yun; Seok Kyu Oh; Eun Mi Park; Yun Kyung Kim; Sang Jae Rhee; Eun Mi Lee; Je Lee; Nam Jin Yoo; Nam-Ho Kim; Jong Chun Park Journal: Circ J Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 2.993
Authors: Petra M Gorter; Alexander M de Vos; Yolanda van der Graaf; Pieter R Stella; Pieter A Doevendans; Matthijs F L Meijs; Mathias Prokop; Frank L J Visseren Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-05-24 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: John H Nichols; Bharat Samy; Khurram Nasir; Caroline S Fox; P Christian Schulze; Fabian Bamberg; Udo Hoffmann Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2008-08-19
Authors: Guido A Rosito; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Frederick L Ruberg; Amir A Mahabadi; Ramachandran S Vasan; Christopher J O'Donnell; Caroline S Fox Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Amir A Mahabadi; Joseph M Massaro; Guido A Rosito; Daniel Levy; Joanne M Murabito; Philip A Wolf; Christopher J O'Donnell; Caroline S Fox; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-01-09 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Nikolaos Alexopoulos; Dalton S McLean; Matthew Janik; Chesnal D Arepalli; Arthur E Stillman; Paolo Raggi Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2009-11-20 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Rajinder P Singh-Moon; Soo Young Park; Diego M Song Cho; Agastya Vaidya; Charles C Marboe; Elaine Y Wan; Christine P Hendon Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 3.732