| Literature DB >> 28811830 |
Guangjun Wang1, Shuyong Jia1, Hongyan Li1, Ze Wang1, Yuying Tian1, Weibo Zhang1.
Abstract
Acupuncture (Acup) and moxibustion (Moxi) are commonly used interventions in clinical practice. However, the difference between Acup and moxibustion mechanisms is unclear. In current study, blood perfusion responses resulted from Acup or Moxi at Weishu acupoint (BL21) and control points were explored, respectively. The time series of blood flux signals at BL21 and control points were transformed with Morlet wavelet, and the differences in each frequency interval were observed. The results suggested that acupoint response to different stimulation is a comprehensive process which related to all components of blood perfusion signals. Whereas the different response at control points was not observed, there has been significant difference coherence value between Acup and Moxi stimulation. The results suggested the influence of Acup and Moxi not only on the level of blood perfusion at local area; the intrinsic relevance after stimulation which can be evaluated by coherence analysis is also an appropriate index to distinguish different stimulations.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28811830 PMCID: PMC5546059 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8237580
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Subject's individual characteristics.
| Subject number | M/F | Age (year) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | BMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub 1 | M | 32 | 172 | 85 | 28.73 |
| Sub 2 | M | 38 | 172 | 80 | 27.04 |
| Sub 3 | F | 26 | 164 | 47 | 17.47 |
| Sub 4 | F | 27 | 160 | 45 | 17.58 |
| Sub 5 | F | 26 | 164 | 53 | 19.71 |
| Sub 6 | M | 27 | 168 | 68 | 24.09 |
| Sub 7 | F | 28 | 158 | 44 | 17.63 |
| Sub 8 | F | 24 | 154 | 46 | 19.40 |
| Sub 9 | M | 25 | 170 | 60 | 20.76 |
| Sub 10 | F | 27 | 169 | 65 | 22.76 |
| Mean ± SD | 4M/6F | 28 ± 4 | 165.10 ± 6.20 | 59.30 ± 14.92 | 21.52 ± 4.03 |
Figure 1Stimulation schematic diagram.
Figure 2Original blood flux signals at right BL21 (a). Changes of skin blood flux at BL21 resulted from Acup or Moxi (b). P < 0.01, Acup versus Moxi, paired t-test. All values are expressed as mean ± SE. Illustration of recording points (c), BL21 (blue) and upper point and down point (both in red).
Figure 3Morlet wavelet transform results. Case results (a) and compared results (b). P < 0.05; P < 0.01, Acup versus Moxi, paired t-test. All values are reported as mean ± SE.
Figure 4Morlet wavelet transform results of upper point and down point. Case results of upper point (a) and down point (b); compared results of upper point (c) and down point (d). All values are reported as mean ± SE.
Figure 5Coherence value of blood perfusion between upper point and down point. Case results (a) and compared results of mean coherence value from 0.8 Hz to 1.4 Hz frequency interval (b). P < 0.01, Acup versus Moxi. All values are reported as mean ± SE.