| Literature DB >> 28811510 |
Naohiro Imamura1, Masabumi Komatsu2,3, Shinta Ohashi4,5, Shoji Hashimoto6, Takuya Kajimoto7, Shinji Kaneko8, Tsutomu Takano9.
Abstract
To elucidate the temporal changes in the radiocesium distribution in forests contaminated by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, we monitored the 137Cs concentration and inventory within forests from 2011 to 2015 across nine plots containing variable tree species and different contamination levels. The 137Cs concentrations in needles and branches decreased exponentially at all coniferous plots, with effective ecological half-lives of 0.45-1.55 yr for needles and 0.83-1.69 yr for branches. By contrast, the 137Cs concentration in deciduous konara oak leaves did not change over the five years. The concentration of 137Cs in oak wood increased by 37-75%, whereas that in Japanese red pine decreased by 63% over the five years. In Japanese cedar and hinoki cypress, the 137Cs concentration in wood showed an increasing trend in half of the plots. The changes in 137Cs in the organic and mineral soil layers were not strongly related to the tree species or contamination level. Our multi-site, multi-species monitoring results revealed that the pattern of temporal changes in radiocesium in the 9 forest plots was similar overall; however, changes in 137Cs in needles/leaves and wood differed among tree species.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28811510 PMCID: PMC5557944 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08261-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
General characteristics, biomass of aboveground components, and forest floor surface densities of belowground components at the study plots.
| Plot | KU1-S | KU1-H | KU1-Q | KU2-S | OT-S | OT-Q | OT-P | TD-S | TB-H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latitude | 37°17′18″ | 37°17′22″ | 37°17′22″ | 37°22′53″ | 37°34′40″ | 37°34′15″ | 37°34′14″ | 37°19′28″ | 36°10′22″ |
| Longitude | 140°47′48″ | 140°47′33″ | 140°47′30″ | 140°42′58″ | 140°18′20″ | 140°18′29″ | 140°18′30″ | 139°31′15″ | 140°10′33″ |
| Distance from FDNPP (km) | 26 | 27 | 27 | 28 | 66 | 66 | 66 | 134 | 160 |
| Elevation (m) | 660 | 720 | 720 | 690 | 730 | 760 | 750 | 790 | 360 |
| Topography | Flat and steep | Flat | Flat | Flat | Flat and steep | Flat | Flat | Steep | Steep |
| Air dose rate at 1 m height (μSv h−1)a | 3.05 ± 0.42 | 3.70 ± 0.22 | 3.16 ± 0.09 | 1.29 ± 0.39 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.02 |
| 137Cs deposition (kBq m−2)b | 630 | 470 | 470 | 160 | 41 | 44 | 44 | 10 | 33 |
| Dominant sp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stand age (yr) | 43 | 26 | 26 | 57 | 42 | 43 | 43 | 38 | 43 |
| Density (ha−1)c | 975/569 | 1330/− | −/1750 | 733/225 | 1117/− | 550/654 | 938/375 | 1105/133 | 2133/− |
| Mean DBH (cm)c | 18.8/14.3 | 17.6/− | −/13.1 | 30.9/25.8 | 24.8/− | 19.0/17.5 | 18.8/15.6 | 19.9/17.2 | 20.6/− |
| Aboveground (kg m−2)c | |||||||||
| Needles/leaves | 1.2–1.4/0.2 | 0.9–1.2 /− | −/0.3 | 3.0–3.3/0.00 | 2.3–2.7/− | 0.3/0.3 | 0.4–0.5/0.1–0.2 | 1.5–1.8/0.1 | 2.3–2.5/− |
| Branches | 0.7–0.9/0.8–0.9 | 1.1–1.6/− | −/1.2 | 2.6–2.9/0.02 | 1.5–1.8/− | 0.7/1.3–1.5 | 1.0–1.1/0.6–0.7 | 0.9–1.1/0.3–0.4 | 3.2–3.6/− |
| Bark | 0.4–0.5/0.7 | 0.6–0.8/− | −/1.1 | 1.0–1.5/0.01–0.02 | 0.9–1.0/− | 0.3/0.6–0.7 | 0.4/0.3–0.4 | 0.7–0.8/0.2 | 1.0–1.6/− |
| Wood | 6.6–8.1/3.3–3.7 | 9.9–12.7/− | −/6.0 | 19.7–21.0/0.1 | 13.7–16.6/− | 4.4–4.8/4.2–4.8 | 6.6–6.9/2.1–2.5 | 8.3–10.8/0.9–1.3 | 23.6–26.7/− |
| Tree total | 8.9–10.8/5.0–5.5 | 12.5–16.4/− | −/8.6 | 26.2–28.7/0.1–0.2 | 18.4–22.0/− | 5.7–6.1/6.4–7.2 | 8.4–8.8/3.2–3.7 | 11.3–14.4/1.4–1.9 | 30.2–34.3/− |
| Belowground (kg m−2) | |||||||||
| Organic layer | 1.1–1.6 | 1.1–1.5 | 1.0–1.2 | 1.4–2.8 | 1.6–2.1 | 0.9–1.5 | 1.0–1.7 | 1.1–1.6 | 0.8–1.5 |
| Mineral soil 0–5 cm | 15.7–19.6 | 14.4–17.2 | 18.0–19.4 | 10.8–14.6 | 11.9–14.3 | 13.9–17.9 | 16.2–18.7 | 15.3–21.3 | 16.5–17.4 |
| Mineral soil 5–10 cm | 22.8–29.6 | 22.8–23.8 | 23.4–26.2 | 14.6–22.6 | 17.6–19.0 | 24.2–25.8 | 23.7–28.7 | 21.8–33.1 | 24.1–26.6 |
| Mineral soil 10–15 cm | 27.1–32.7 | 22.6–27.3 | 27.9–29.7 | 22.5–28.3 | 19.9–22.4 | 26.4–30.8 | 25.1–28.8 | 27.6–47.4 | 25.6–27.4 |
| Mineral soil 15–20 cm | 29.5–36.3 | 24.7–27.8 | 30.1–33.8 | 23.8–29.3 | 20.5–25.0 | 28.3–31.6 | 24.3–32.2 | 33.7–40.9 | 23.5–27.6 |
| Sampling date | |||||||||
| 2011 | 31 Aug | — | — | 28 Nov | 9, 11 Aug | 9–10 Aug | 9–10 Aug | 7–8 Sep | 16 Feb, 2012 |
| 2012 | 23, 27 Aug | 24, 28 Aug | 24, 28 Aug | 20 Sep | 1, 6 Aug | 2, 7 Aug | 2, 7 Aug | 3–4 Sep | 28 Jan, 5 Feb, 2013 |
| 2013 | 26 Aug | 27 Aug | 27 Aug | 27–28 Aug | 1, 5 Aug | 2, 6 Aug | 1–2, 6 Aug | 4, 10–11 Sep | 25 Sep, 3 Oct |
| 2014 | 25–26 Aug, 3 Sep | 26 Aug, 3 Sep | 26–27 Aug | 27 Aug, 17 Sep | 29–30 Jul | 30 Jul–1 Aug | 29 Jul–1 Aug | 1–3 Sep | 30 Sep–2 Oct |
| 2015 | 25 Aug | 25–26 Aug | 26 Aug | 26–27 Aug | 4 Aug | 5 Aug | 4–5 Aug | 2–3 Sep | 28, 30 Sep |
aThe air dose rates are the averages and SD (n = 6 at KU1-H and KU1-Q, n = 20 at KU2-S and TB-H, n = 27 at KU1-S, n = 32 at TD-S, and n = 36 at OT-Q and OT-P) from the first observation date.
bThe deposition of 137Cs at each plot was obtained from the 5th airborne monitoring survey data collected on 28 June 2012 and reported on the website “Extension Site of Distribution Map of Radiation Dose, etc.” prepared by MEXT, Japan[31].
cFor each component of every plot, the results for coniferous trees are shown on the left, and those for broad-leaved trees are shown on the right of each slash to denote the stand density, mean DBH, and aboveground biomass. The aboveground and belowground value are the ranges over the 4–5 years of the study.
Figure 1Locations of the study plots. The study plots are shown in a distribution map of 137Cs and 134Cs deposition levels on June 28, 2012 that was generated using the website “Extension Site of Distribution Map of Radiation Dose, etc”. prepared by MEXT, Japan[31]. The Extension Site of Distribution Map of Radiation Dose, etc., was created by editing GSI Tiles (elevation)[39]. KU1 and KU2: Kawauchi sites, OT: Otama site, TD: Tadami site, TB: Mt. Tsukuba site; -S: Japanese cedar plot; -H: hinoki cypress plot; -Q: DBL species-dominant plot; -P: Japanese red pine-dominant plot.
Figure 2Time series of needle/leaf, branch, bark, and wood 137Cs concentrations at each study plot. For individual samples, log-transformed 137Cs concentrations above the detection limit were plotted against the sampling year. Maximum likelihood regression analysis was performed for data below the detection limit[38]. Significant trends between the log-transformed concentration and sampling year (linear regression analysis, p < 0.05) are denoted by solid lines. The sampling period was August–September in each year except at KU2-S in 2011 (November 2011) and TB-H in 2011 and 2012 (February 2012 and February 2013, respectively). The radiocesium concentration was decay corrected to September 1 of each sampling year.
Figure 3Time series of organic layer and mineral soil layer (0–5 cm, 5–10 cm, 10–15 cm, and 15–20 cm) 137Cs concentrations at each study plot. For individual samples, log-transformed 137Cs concentrations above the detection limit were plotted against the sampling year. Maximum likelihood regression analysis was performed for data below the detection limit[38]. Significant trends between the log-transformed concentration and sampling year (linear regression analysis, p < 0.05) are denoted by solid lines. The sampling period was August–September in each year except at KU2-S in 2011 (November 2011) and TB-H in 2011 and 2012 (February 2012 and February 2013, respectively). The radiocesium concentration was decay corrected to September 1 of each sampling year.
Figure 4Time series of the 137Cs inventories in the aboveground compartments, organic layer, and mineral soil layers at each study plot. Error bars denote the SDs of aboveground and belowground 137Cs inventories.