| Literature DB >> 28809864 |
Jen Y Lee1, Isaac Garcia-Murillas1, Rosalind J Cutts1, David Gonzalez De Castro2, Lorna Grove2, Tara Hurley2, Fuqiang Wang2, Christopher Nutting1,2, Katie Newbold1,2, Kevin Harrington1,2, Nicholas Turner1,2, Shreerang Bhide1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Following chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) for human papilloma virus positive (HPV+) locally advanced head and neck cancer, patients frequently undergo unnecessary neck dissection (ND) and/or repeated biopsies for abnormal PET-CT, which causes significant morbidity. We assessed the role of circulating HPV DNA in identifying 'true' residual disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28809864 PMCID: PMC5589999 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Patient and tumour characteristics for the test cohort
| Number of patients | 55 |
| T-stage | |
| 1 | 6 |
| 2 | 25 |
| 3 | 15 |
| 4 | 9 |
| N-stage | |
| 0 | 7 |
| 1 | 6 |
| 2A | 2 |
| 2B | 28 |
| 2C | 12 |
| Treatment | |
| IC+CCRT | 12 |
| CCRT | 43 |
| Pack-years (includes ex smokers) | |
| Non-smoker | 15 |
| ⩽10 | 11 |
| >10 | 29 |
| Tumour sub-site | |
| Oropharynx | 47 |
| Larynx | 4 |
| Hypopharynx | 4 |
Abbreviations: IC=induction chemotherapy; CCRT=cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy.
Figure 1Comparison of HPV16 status by E7 mRNA, p16 staining and HPV16-detect (NGS) assay in tissue and plasma. (A) There was 100% agreement between the HPV16 status assigned by the ‘gold standard’ E7 mRNA expression and HPV16-detect. (B) Test cohort: HPV16-detect assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity in detecting HPV DNA in plasma compared to tissue. (C) Validation cohort: HPV16-detect assay demonstrated 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity in assigning HPV status in plasma compared to p16 staining in tissue. NPV=negative predictive value; PPV=positive predictive value.
Figure 2HPV DNA tracking in treatment responsive HPV+ patients using the HPV16-detect assay. HPV DNA levels decreased below threshold at 12-weeks post-treatment in patients receiving C-CRT (n=19, A) and in patients who received induction chemotherapy (IC) and CRT (n=7, B). Red plots in (A) highlight the three patients in (C–E). Residual disease was evident in three patients by 18F-FDG PET-CT (C–E), with negative biopsies and below threshold levels of HPV DNA in the plasma taken at the time of biopsies (PA). PA=post-assessment; post-IC=post-induction chemotherapy. A full colour version of this figure is available at the British Journal of Cancer journal online.
Figure 3HPV16-detect assay tracked presence of residual disease with HPV DNA levels decreased in response to treatment at 6 weeks, but increased significantly at 12 weeks, which corresponded to presence of liver metastases on 18F-FDG PET-CT. HPV DNA levels decreased post-liver resection, however never dropped below the threshold. 18F-FDG PET-CT 8 months following liver surgery revealed disease relapse in cervical lymph nodes. CRT=chemo-radiotherapy; PA=post-assessment; post-IC=post-induction chemotherapy. A full colour version of this figure is available at the British Journal of Cancer journal online.
Figure 4HPV DNA tracking in the validation cohort with HPV16-detect assay. HPV DNA levels decreased below threshold at 12-weeks post-treatment (n=10, A). Red plots in (A) highlight the three patients in (B–D) with residual lymph node disease on 18F-FDG PET-CT, negative ND specimens and below threshold levels of HPV DNA in the plasma taken at the time ND. PA=post-assessment; post-IC=post-induction chemotherapy; Post-1 week=post-5 fractions of radiotherapy. A full colour version of this figure is available at British Journal of Cancer journal online.