Literature DB >> 28808802

Interpretation and Diplomacy Aspects of Authority and Care in Imaging Reports.

Werner A Golder1.   

Abstract

Whereas the creativity and intellectual power of the radiologist are measured against his/her written report, the value of the message will not only be judged by the precision of the medical statement. The same result can be attributed to different words. Numerous common and accidental factors exert influence on the decision on what is said and what is not said, how it is assessed and what is ignored. The less certain a diagnosis is and the less favourable its possible consequences are, the more subtleties and periphrases are to be expected within the report. The decision on the nature and the volume of the written report will not only be taken by the time of recording, but is likewise prepared by the knowledge of the patient's history and symptoms, the personal relationship to him/her as well as by a set of conditions throughout the inspection of the images. The intuition that accompanies the information transfer in imaging diagnostics does not only explain the differences in volume and depth of diagnosis and differential diagnosis, but also the range of diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empathy; Interpretation; Objectivity; Recommendation; X-ray report

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28808802      PMCID: PMC5788820          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-0014-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  6 in total

1.  Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content.

Authors:  S S Naik; A Hanbidge; S R Wilson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Optimization of Radiology Reports for Intensive Care Unit Portable Chest Radiographs: Perceptions and Preferences of Radiologists and ICU Practitioners.

Authors:  Eduardo J Mortani Barbosa; Marsha C Lynch; Curtis P Langlotz; Warren B Gefter
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  [The radiological report: shaping it up].

Authors:  J Leclère; C Leclère; L Ollivier
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  2007-02

4.  Influence of prior radiologic information on the interpretation of radiographic examinations.

Authors:  U O Aideyan; K Berbaum; W L Smith
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Guide to effective quality improvement reporting in radiology.

Authors:  David B Larson; James R Duncan; Paul G Nagy; Jonathan B Kruskal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The impact of clinical history on mammographic interpretations.

Authors:  J G Elmore; C K Wells; D H Howard; A R Feinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.