Literature DB >> 24555635

Guide to effective quality improvement reporting in radiology.

David B Larson1, James R Duncan, Paul G Nagy, Jonathan B Kruskal.   

Abstract

Substantial societal investments in biomedical research are contributing to an explosion in knowledge that the health delivery system is struggling to effectively implement. Managing this complexity requires ingenuity, research and development, and dedicated resources. Many innovative solutions can be found in quality improvement (QI) activities, defined as the "systematic, data-guided activities designed to bring about immediate, positive changes in the delivery of healthcare in particular settings." QI shares many similarities with biomedical research, but also differs in several important ways. Inclusion of QI in the peer-reviewed literature is needed to foster its advancement through the dissemination, testing, and refinement of theories, methods, and applications. QI methods and reporting standards are less mature in health care than those of biomedical research. A lack of widespread understanding and consensus regarding the purpose of publishing QI-related material also exists. In this document, guidance is provided in evaluating quality of QI-related material and in determining priority of submitted material for publication.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24555635     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  2 in total

Review 1.  Interpretation and Diplomacy Aspects of Authority and Care in Imaging Reports.

Authors:  Werner A Golder
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Interpretation and Diplomacy Aspects of Authority and Care in Imaging Reports.

Authors:  Werner Albert Golder
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.