| Literature DB >> 28808476 |
Walimuni Prabhashini Kaushalya Mendis Abeysekera1, Sirimal Premakumara Galbada Arachchige1, Wanigasekera Daya Ratnasooriya2,3.
Abstract
Ethanol (95%) and dichloromethane : methanol (1 : 1) bark extracts of authenticated Ceylon cinnamon were investigated for range of antilipidemic activities (ALA): HMG-CoA reductase, lipase, cholesterol esterase, and cholesterol micellization inhibitory activities and bile acids binding in vitro. Individual compounds in bark extracts were also evaluated. Bark extracts showed ALA in all the assays studied. The IC50 (μg/mL) values ranged within 153.07 ± 8.38-277.13 ± 32.18, 297.57 ± 11.78-301.09 ± 4.05, 30.61 ± 0.79-34.05 ± 0.41, and 231.96 ± 9.22-478.89 ± 9.27, respectively, for HMG-CoA reductase, lipase, cholesterol esterase, and cholesterol micellization inhibitory activities. The bile acids binding (3 mg/mL) for taurocholate, glycodeoxycholate, and chenodeoxycholate ranged within 19.74 ± 0.31-20.22 ± 0.31, 21.97 ± 2.21-26.97 ± 1.61, and 16.11 ± 1.42-19.11 ± 1.52%, respectively. The observed ALA were moderate compared to the reference drugs studied. Individual compounds in bark extracts ranged within 2.14 ± 0.28-101.91 ± 3.61 and 0.42 ± 0.03-49.12 ± 1.89 mg/g of extract. Cinnamaldehyde and gallic acid were the highest and the lowest among the tested compounds. The ethanol extract had highest quantity of individual compounds and ALA investigated. Properties observed indicate usefulness of Ceylon cinnamon bark in managing hyperlipidemia and obesity worldwide. Further, this study provides scientific evidence for the traditional claim that Ceylon cinnamon has antilipidemic activities.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28808476 PMCID: PMC5541800 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7347219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity of ethanol and DCM : M bark extracts of Ceylon cinnamon. Data represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3); mean % inhibition values of ethanol and DCM : M bark extracts superscripted by different letters at each concentration were significantly different at p < 0.05. Mean IC50 values of ethanol bark, DCM : M, and pravastatin were 153.07 ± 8.38, 277.13 ± 32.18, and 0.50 ± 0.05 μg/mL, respectively. Ethanol bark, DCM : M bark, and pravastatin r2 = 0.97, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively. DCM : M: dichloromethane : methanol.
Antilipase activity of bark extracts of Ceylon cinnamon and orlistat.
| Extract/Std | % inhibition |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration ( | ||||||
| Bark | 37.5 | 75 | 150 | 300 | 600 | IC50 |
|
| ||||||
| Ethanol | 5.78 ± 0.57 | 6.77 ± 0.90 | 24.50 ± 3.13 | 49.89 ± 0.21 | 55.87 ± 2.54 | 301.09 ± 4.05a |
| DCM : M | 12.50 ± 0.93 | 17.95 ± 4.04 | 24.14 ± 2.20 | 52.07 ± 1.39 | 55.66 ± 2.17 | 297.57 ± 11.78a |
|
| ||||||
| Std | 0.01 | 0.39 | 1.56 | 6.25 | 25 | IC50 |
|
| ||||||
| Orlistat | 18.85 ± 0.31 | 27.84 ± 0.61 | 34.62 ± 0.67 | 41.54 ± 0.55 | 49.69 ± 0.65 | 26.78 ± 2.45b |
Data represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3); mean IC50 values superscripted by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. Ethanol bark, DCM : M bark, and orlistat are r2 = 0.99, 0.98, and 0.98, respectively. DCM : M: dichloromethane : methanol.
Cholesterol esterase inhibitory activity of bark extracts of Ceylon cinnamon and simvastatin.
| Extract/Std | % inhibition |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration ( | ||||||
| Bark | 3.125 | 6.25 | 12.5 | 25 | 50 | IC50 |
|
| ||||||
| Ethanol | 1.85 ± 0.58 | 12.49 ± 1.50 | 32.55 ± 0.32 | 48.65 ± 0.61 | 58.30 ± 1.12 | 30.61 ± 0.79b |
| DCM : M | 2.44 ± 1.24 | 8.74 ± 0.29 | 27.47 ± 0.68 | 46.09 ± 0.58 | 57.99 ± 0.25 | 34.05 ± 0.41a |
|
| ||||||
| Std | 2.5 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 30 | IC50 |
|
| ||||||
| Simvastatin | 18.49 ± 0.57 | 27.09 ± 1.16 | 34.38 ± 1.83 | 50.00 ± 3.33 | 73.75 ± 4.31 | 18.56 ± 0.68c |
Data represented as mean ± SEM (n = 4). Mean IC50 values superscripted by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. Ethanol bark, DCM : M bark, and simvastatin are r2 = 0.99, 0.98, and 0.99, respectively. DCM : M: dichloromethane : methanol.
Cholesterol micellization inhibitory activity of bark extracts and EGCG.
| Extract/Std | % inhibition of cholesterol solubility in micelles |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration ( | ||||
| 250 | 500 | 1000 | ||
| EGCG | 55.16 ± 0.91 | 69.78 ± 1.82 | 96.75 ± 1.70 | 150.98 ± 18.72e |
| Ethanol bark | 49.48 ± 0.78 | 69.48 ± 0.81 | 98.09 ± 0.51 | 231.96 ± 9.22d |
| DCM : M bark | 19.36 ± 2.04 | 62.15 ± 1.06 | 73.94 ± 0.87 | 478.89 ± 9.27c |
Data represented as mean ± SEM (EGCG n = 3; ethanol bark and DCM : M bark n = 6 each). IC50 values in a column superscripted by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. EGCG, ethanol bark, and DCM : M bark are r2 = 1.00, 0.99, and 0.90, respectively. DCM : M: dichloromethane : methanol; EGCG: epigallocatechin gallate.
Figure 2Binding of bile acids by bark extracts of Ceylon cinnamon and cholestyramine. Data represented as mean ± SEM (n = 4); statistical analysis was carried out separately for each concentration of each bile acid. Mean % binding values superscripted by different letters at each concentration of each bile acid are significantly different at p < 0.05; ethanol bark and DCM : M bark zero binding for sodium glycodeoxycholate at 1 mg/mL; DCM : M bark zero binding for sodium chenodeoxycholate at 1 mg/mL; DCM : M: dichloromethane : methanol.
Quantification of individual compounds in bark extracts of Ceylon cinnamon.
| Compound | (mg/g of extract) | |
|---|---|---|
| Ethanol bark | DCM : M Bark | |
| Cinnamyl acetate | 11.26 ± 0.17a | 8.92 ± 0.71b |
| Eugenol | 13.89 ± 0.14b | 19.98 ± 1.56a |
| Kaempferol | 7.04 ± 1.73a | 5.84 ± 1.64a |
| Cinnamaldehyde | 101.91 ± 3.61a | 49.12 ± 1.89b |
| trans-Cinnamic acid | 3.33 ± 0.65a | 2.53 ± 0.13a |
| Phlorizidin | 4.01 ± 0.36a | 4.47 ± 1.39a |
| Epicatechin | 10.73 ± 0.73a | 6.90 ± 1.03b |
| Catechin | 17.28 ± 1.65a | 2.90 ± 0.57b |
| 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 11.18 ± 0.23a | 3.26 ± 0.47b |
| Gallic acid | 2.14 ± 0.28a | 0.42 ± 0.03b |
Data represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3); bark extracts were separately analyzed for each phenolic compound; mean values in the column superscripted by different letters for each phenolic compound within ethanol and DCM : M bark extracts were significantly different at p < 0.05. DCM : M: dichloromethane : methanol.
Figure 3HPLC chromatogram of ethanol bark extract of Ceylon cinnamon. 1: cinnamyl acetate; 2: eugenol; 3: kaempferol; 4: cinnamaldehyde; 5: trans-cinnamic acid; 6: phlorizidin; 7: epicatechin; 8: 4-hydroxybenzoic acid; 9: catechin; 10: gallic acid.
Figure 4HPLC chromatogram of DCM : M bark extract of Ceylon cinnamon. 1: cinnamyl acetate; 2: eugenol; 3: kaempferol; 4: cinnamaldehyde; 5: trans-cinnamic acid; 6: phlorizidin; 7: epicatechin; 8: 4-hydroxybenzoic acid; 9: catechin; 10: gallic acid.