Literature DB >> 28808221

Genetic variation of the PSCA gene (rs2294008) is not associated with the risk of prostate cancer.

Il-Seok Lee1, Sung Pil Seo1, Yun Sok Ha2, Pildu Jeong1, Ho Won Kang1, Won Tae Kim1, Yong-June Kim1, Seok Joong Yun1, Sang Cheol Lee1, Wun-Jae Kim1.   

Abstract

Prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) is a cell-membrane glycoprotein consisting of 123 amino acids and highly expressed in the prostate, but there have been few reports on the relationship between rs2294008 ofPSCA and prostate cancer in the literature. Therefore, we evaluated the association between rs2294008 and the risk of prostate cancer. A total of 240 prostate cancer patients and 306 controls (patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia) were enrolled. Genotype analysis of rs2294008 ofPSCA was performed using PCR. Logistic regression analysis was performed according to the genotype ofPSCA rs2294008. We found that CT and TT genotypes were associated with an insignificant risk of prostate cancer compared with the CC genotype (P= 0.627 and 0.397, respectively). In addition, there was no significant difference in rs2294008 according to clinicopathological parameters, such as age, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), stage, and metastasis in prostate cancer (P>0.05 for each). Age, Gleason score, PSA, pathologic stage, and metastasis did not modify the association between PSCA and the risk of prostate cancer (each P>0.05 for each). Taken together, the genetic polymorphism of PSCA rs2294008 was not associated with the risk of prostate cancer. Our results suggest that rs2294008 may not play a role in prostate carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28808221      PMCID: PMC5460610          DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20160072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Res        ISSN: 1674-8301


Introduction

Prostate cancer is the second most common malignant tumor in men in Western countries, and the number of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients is 129.4 per 100,000 men per year [. Among various risk factors for prostate cancer, genetic factors, including race, family, and specific gene variants, might be associated with prostate cancer. Especially, among specific gene variants, mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 , Hereditary Prostate cancer gene 1 ( HPC1 ), and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion are linked to prostate cancer [. Recently, several studies have reported that the genetic polymorphisms of several genes at 17q12, 17q24.3, and 8q24 are significantly associated with prostate cancer[. There is growing interest in the role of genetic polymorphism in the risk for prostate cancer according to genetic polymorphism in patients with prostate cancer. Prostate stem cell antigen ( PSCA ) is a cell-membrane glycoprotein consisting of 123 amino acids and highly expressed in the prostate and bladder[. Furthermore, PSCA is highly expressed in human prostate cancer, but has limited expression in normal tissues, which has become a potential target biomarker in prostate cancer. Interestingly, Joung et al . [ have demonstrated that men with the rs1045531AA genotype of PSCA are at high risk of prostate cancer in genotype analysis. However, there have been few reports about the relationship between rs2294008 of PSCA and prostate cancer. Therefore, we evaluated the association between rs2294008 and the risk of prostate cancer.

Materials and methods

Study population

This study recruited data from 240 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy or palliative transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and were histologically confirmed to have adenocarcinoma of the prostate and 306 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients for controls. Gleason scores (GS) were assigned to 12 specimens obtained from core transurethral biopsy, TURP, or radical prostatectomy. Tumor stage was estimated for specimens obtained from radical prostatectomy, and TNM 2002 stage was determined using computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, or bone scanning. Collection and analysis of the samples were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chungbuk National University, and each subject provided written informed consent (IRB approval number: 2010-12-010).

Blood sampling, DNA extraction, and genotype assays of polymorphism

From each patient, a 5 mL of blood sample of was collected with a 0.1 mL EDTA tube before the operation, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C. Genomic DNA was extracted from human whole blood for genotyping using a genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. PSCA genotyping was performed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). The PCR primers for PSCA rs2294008 were 5′-AAACCCGCTG- GTGTTGACT-3′ (sense) and 5′-TCCCTTCCTCCTTCCTTCC-3′ (antisense). DNA (200 ng) was amplified in a total volume of 20 µL, containing 10 pmol of each primer, 0.5 U Taq polymerase, 2.5 mmol/L deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate, and 10xPCR buffer. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 minutes and then 39 cycles of amplification were carried out at 95°C for 45 seconds, 50°C for 45 seconds, and 72°C for 60 seconds, with a final extension step at 72°C for 10 minutes. PCR products were digested overnight at 37°C with Nla III (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions and then separated by electrophoresis on 3% agarose with ethidium bromide staining. PCR products were shown to be digested into 3 types of TT (98 and 158 bp), CT (98, 158, and 256 bp), and CC (256 bp) genotypes.

Statistical analysis

Clinical variables, such as age, GS, PSA, stage, and metastasis, according to genetic polymorphism were compared by the Chi-square test. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using logistic regression models. Wild-type genotypes (CC) were considered baseline risk. Using the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test, the expected frequency of control genotypes was analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). All tests were performed using 2-tailed analysis and a P value of
0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

The mean age of 240 prostate cancer patients was 68.58±7.12 years, and that of 306 controls was 70.12±7.50 years. One hundred and fourteen (47.5%) patients had stage T2, 80 (33.3%) had stage T3, and 46 (19.2%) had stage T4 prostate cancer. The baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in . Baseline characteristics of the subjects Prostate cancer compared with controls, P 
0.05.

Association between the risk of prostate cancer and (rs2294008)

shows genotypes and allele frequencies for rs2294008 in prostate cancer patients and controls. For prostate cancer, the CC, CT, and TT genotypes were observed in 22.5%, 56.2%, and 21.3% of the patients, respectively, and for controls, 25.5%, 53.3%, and 21.2%, respectively. The genotype frequencies for rs2294008 followed the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium ( P = 0.623). Compared with the CC genotype, the CT and TT genotypes were associated with insignificant risk of prostate cancer ( P = 0.627 and 0.397, respectively). Association between the risk of prostate cancer and the gene rs2294008 †Genotype distribution and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ( P =0.623). OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval

Relationship between and clinicopathologic parameters in prostate cancer

As shown in , there was no significant difference in rs2294008 according to clinicopathologic parameters, such as age, GS, PSA, stage, and metastasis in prostate cancer ( P >0.05 for each). Relationship between (rs2294008) and clinicopathological parameters in prostate cancer

Stratified analysis of according to prostate cancer classification

The association between PSCA and prostate cancer was further evaluated by stratified analysis of age, GS, PSA, pathologic stage, and metastasis. As shown in , age, GS, PSA, pathologic stage, and metastasis did not modify the association between PSCA and the risk of prostate cancer ( P >0.05 for each). Stratified analysis of the gene (rs2294008) according to prostate cancer classification OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the role of the genetic variation of PSCA rs2294008 in prostate cancer susceptibility. It was found that the variation of PSCA rs2294008 was not associated with prostate cancer. PSCA was initially identified and isolated as a tumor antigen highly expressed in prostate cancer[. PSCA plays a role in signal transduction and cell-growth regulation[. PSCA is highly expressed in the prostate, bladder, and pancreatic carcinomas, but downregulated in gastric, esophageal, and head-and-neck carcinomas[. Therefore, the role of PSCA in carcinogenesis remains still controversial. The genetic polymorphism of PSCA (rs2294008) is associated with the increased incidence of gastric cancer in the Korean population[. Song et al. [ have reported that the CT and TT genotypes are associated with a significantly increased risk of gastric cancer (OR= 1.5 and 1.71, respectively) compared to the CC genotype. However, Lu et al. [ have demonstrated that rs2294008 variant genotypes (CC/CT) are not associated with increased risk of gastric cancer in the Chinese population. Thus, the genetic polymorphism of PSCA and its association with gastric cancer risk may differ among races. Similarly, in bladder cancer, Yates et al. [ have suggested that genetic polymorphism on 8q24 is associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer, but not associated with disease aggressiveness. In addition, Fu et al. [ have indicated that rs2294008 is important for bladder cancer susceptibility. Analysis of 12 genotypes for PSCA revealed that the rs1045531 is significantly associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer and that CCCAGGTACGG and CGA haplotype carriers have a significant association with risk of prostate cancer[. To the best of our knowledge, there is only one study by Joung et al. [(10)] on the association between prostate cancer risk and genetic polymorphisms of PSCA . There are some limitations in the present study. The sample size of our study is relatively small for identifying genetic susceptibility. We investigated only the PSCA gene rs2294008 among various PSCA genetic polymorphisms. Further large cohort studies are needed to confirm our results. Also, large cohort studies on genetic variants of PSCA in Western countries are required to identify the association between the risk of prostate cancer and SNP. In conclusion, the genetic polymorphism of PSCA rs2294008 was not associated with the risk of prostate cancer. Our results suggest that rs2294008 may not play a role in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. However, since PSCA as a transmembrane protein is associated with prostate cancer, additional studies on polymorphisms in the PSCA gene in addition to rs2294008 are needed to confirm the association between PSCA SNP and prostate cancer.
Tab.1

Baseline characteristics of the subjects

ControlProstate cancer
Number306240
Age, n (%)70.12±7.5068.58±7.12

70 years136 (44.4)132 (55.0)
≥70 years170 (55.6)108 (45.0)
Gleason score, n (%)
≤7120 (50.0)
872 (30.0)
≥948 (20.0)
PSA (ng/mL), n (%)

20117 (48.7)
≥20,
5060 (25.0)
≥5063 (26.3)
Stage, n (%)
T2114 (47.5)
T380 (33.3)
T446 (19.2)
Metastasis, n (%)
non-metastasis196 (81.7)
metastasis44 (18.3)

†Prostate cancer compared with controls, P 
0.05.

Tab.2

Association between the risk of prostate cancer and the gene rs2294008

ControlProstate cancerOR (95% CI) P value
CC78 (25.5)54 (22.5)1
CT163 (53.3)135 (56.2)0.882 (0.533-1.462)0.627
TT65 (21.2)51 (21.3)0.836 (0.552-1.266)0.397
C319 (52.1)243 (50.6)1
T293 (47.9)237 (49.4)0.942 (0.741-1.196)0.632

†Genotype distribution and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ( P =0.623). OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval

Tab.3

Relationship between (rs2294008) and clinicopathological parameters in prostate cancer

PSCA
VariablesCC (3)CT (2)TT (1) P value
Age, n (%)0.253

70 years35 (26.5)71 (53.8)26 (19.7)
≥70 years19 (17.6)64 (59.3)25 (23.1)
Gleason score, n (%)0.633
≤726 (21.7)69 (57.5)25 (20.8)
820 (27.8)36 (50.0)16 (22.2)
≥98 (16.7)30 (62.5)10 (20.8)
PSA (ng/mL), n (%)0.686

2029 (24.8)64 (54.7)24 (20.5)
≥20,
5011 (18.3)33 (55.0)16 (26.7)
≥5014 (22.2)38 (60.3)11 (17.5)
Stage, n (%)0.784
T228 (24.5)63 (55.3)23 (20.2)
T315 (18.7)45 (56.3)20 (25.0)
T411 (23.9)27 (58.7)8 (17.4)
Metastasis, n (%)0.195
non-metastasis42 (21.4)108 (55.1)46 (23.5)
metastasis12 (27.3)27 (61.4)5 (11.4)
Tab.4

Stratified analysis of the gene (rs2294008) according to prostate cancer classification

PSCAProstate cancerOR (95% CI) P value
Age, n (%)

70 yearsCC35 (26.5)1
( n =132)CT71 (53.8)1.047 (0.516-2.126)0.899
TT26 (19.7)0.986 (0.558-1.742)0.986
≥70 yearsCC19 (17.6)1
( n =108)CT64 (59.3)0.670 (0.319-1.407)0.290
TT25 (23.1)0.643 (0.343-1.207)0.169
Gleason score, n (%)
≤7CC26 (21.7)1
( n =120)CT69 (57.5)0.867 (0.457-1.644)0.661
TT25 (20.8)0.787 (0.466-1.332)0.373
8CC20 (27.8)1
( n =72)CT36 (50.0)1.042 (0.499-2.173)0.913
TT16 (22.2)1.161 (0.631-2.136)0.631
≥9CC8 (16.7)1
( n =48)CT30 (62.5)0.667 (0.249-1.787)0.420
TT10 (20.8)0.557 (0.244-1.272)0.165
PSA (ng/mL), n (%)

20CC29 (24.8)1
( n =117)CT64 (54.7)1.007 (0.535-1.897)0.983
TT24 (20.5)0.947 (0.566-1.585)0.836
≥20,
50CC11 (18.3)1
( n =60)CT33 (55.0)0.573 (0.249-1.321)0.191
TT16 (26.7)0.697 (0.334-1.451)0.334
≥50CC14 (22.2)1
( n =63)CT38 (60.3)1.061 (0.451-2.495)0.893
TT11 (17.5)0.770 (0.394-1.504)0.444
Stage, n (%)
T2CC28 (24.5)1
( n =114)CT63 (55.3)1.014 (0.534-1.928)0.965
TT23 (20.2)0.929 (0.552-1.563)0.781
T3CC15 (18.7)1
( n =80)CT45 (56.3)0.625 (0.296-1.318)0.217
TT20 (25.0)0.697 (0.366-1.326)0.271
T4CC11 (23.9)1
( n =46)CT27 (58.7)1.146 (0.435-3.018)0.783
TT8 (17.4)0.851 (0.402-1.805)0.675
Metastasis, n (%)
non-metastasisCC42 (21.4)1
( n =196)CT108 (55.1)0.761 (0.447-1.296)0.314
TT46 (23.5)0.813 (0.520-1.271)0.363
metastasisCC12 (27.3)1
( n =44)CT27 (61.3)2.000 (0.670-5.972)0.214
TT5 (11.4)0.929 (0.447-1.930)0.843

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval

  17 in total

1.  Haplotype analysis of prostate stem cell antigen and association with prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Jae Young Joung; Yeon-Su Lee; Sohee Park; Hyekyoung Yoon; Sang Jin Lee; Weon Seo Park; Ho Kyung Seo; Jinsoo Chung; Sook-young Kim; Seung-Hyun Hong; Jeong Seon Kim; Kang Hyun Lee
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Prostate stem cell antigen is overexpressed in human transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  N Amara; G S Palapattu; M Schrage; Z Gu; G V Thomas; F Dorey; J Said; R E Reiter
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Genetic polymorphisms on 8q24.1 and 4p16.3 are not linked with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in contrast to their association with aggressive upper urinary tract tumours.

Authors:  David R Yates; Morgan Rouprêt; Sarah J Drouin; Marie Audouin; Géraldine Cancel-Tassin; Eva Comperat; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Olivier Cussenot
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews.

Authors:  J P Struewing; P Hartge; S Wacholder; S M Baker; M Berlin; M McAdams; M M Timmerman; L C Brody; M A Tucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Genome-wide association study identifies a second prostate cancer susceptibility variant at 8q24.

Authors:  Julius Gudmundsson; Patrick Sulem; Andrei Manolescu; Laufey T Amundadottir; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Agnar Helgason; Thorunn Rafnar; Jon T Bergthorsson; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Adam Baker; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Kristrun R Benediktsdottir; Margret Jakobsdottir; Jianfeng Xu; Thorarinn Blondal; Jelena Kostic; Jielin Sun; Shyamali Ghosh; Simon N Stacey; Magali Mouy; Jona Saemundsdottir; Valgerdur M Backman; Kristleifur Kristjansson; Alejandro Tres; Alan W Partin; Marjo T Albers-Akkers; Javier Godino-Ivan Marcos; Patrick C Walsh; Dorine W Swinkels; Sebastian Navarrete; Sarah D Isaacs; Katja K Aben; Theresa Graif; John Cashy; Manuel Ruiz-Echarri; Kathleen E Wiley; Brian K Suarez; J Alfred Witjes; Mike Frigge; Carole Ober; Eirikur Jonsson; Gudmundur V Einarsson; Jose I Mayordomo; Lambertus A Kiemeney; William B Isaacs; William J Catalona; Rosa B Barkardottir; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Reduced expression of PSCA, a member of the LY-6 family of cell surface antigens, in bladder, esophagus, and stomach tumors.

Authors:  G Bahrenberg; A Brauers; H G Joost; G Jakse
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Association of a common genetic variant in prostate stem-cell antigen with gastric cancer susceptibility in a Korean population.

Authors:  Hye-Rim Song; Hee Nam Kim; Jin-Mei Piao; Sun-Seog Kweon; Jin-Su Choi; Woo-Kyoun Bae; Ik Joo Chung; Young-Kyu Park; Soo-Hyun Kim; Yoo-Duk Choi; Min-Ho Shin
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 4.784

8.  Genetic variation of PSCA gene is associated with the risk of both diffuse- and intestinal-type gastric cancer in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Yan Lu; Jianjian Chen; Yanbing Ding; Guangfu Jin; Juan Wu; Hua Huang; Bin Deng; Zhaolai Hua; Yan Zhou; Yongqian Shu; Ping Liu; Zhibin Hu; Jing Shen; Yaochu Xu; Hongbing Shen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Role of the TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Scott A Tomlins; Bharathi Laxman; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Xuhong Cao; Jindan Yu; Beth E Helgeson; Qi Cao; John R Prensner; Mark A Rubin; Rajal B Shah; Rohit Mehra; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.715

10.  Multiple loci identified in a genome-wide association study of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gilles Thomas; Kevin B Jacobs; Meredith Yeager; Peter Kraft; Sholom Wacholder; Nick Orr; Kai Yu; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Robert Welch; Amy Hutchinson; Andrew Crenshaw; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Brian J Staats; Zhaoming Wang; Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet; Jun Fang; Xiang Deng; Sonja I Berndt; Eugenia E Calle; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Michael J Thun; Carmen Rodriguez; Demetrius Albanes; Jarmo Virtamo; Stephanie Weinstein; Fredrick R Schumacher; Edward Giovannucci; Walter C Willett; Olivier Cussenot; Antoine Valeri; Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Margaret Tucker; Daniela S Gerhard; Joseph F Fraumeni; Robert Hoover; Richard B Hayes; David J Hunter; Stephen J Chanock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Role of Lymphocyte Antigen-6 Family of Genes in Cancer and Immune Cells.

Authors:  Geeta Upadhyay
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 7.561

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.