Sukyung Chung1, Laura Panattoni2, Jeffrey Chi3, Latha Palaniappan3. 1. Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA chungs@pamfri.org. 2. Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. 3. Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Internet-based secure messaging between patients and providers through a patient portal is now common in the practice of modern medicine. There is limited evidence on how messaging is associated with use and clinical quality measures among patients with type 2 diabetes. We examine whether messaging with physicians for medical advice is associated with fewer face-to-face visits and better diabetes management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with diabetes who were enrolled in an online portal of an outpatient health care organization in 2011-2014 were studied (N = 37,762 patient-years). Messages from/to primary care physicians or diabetes-related specialists for medical advice were considered. We estimated the association of messaging with diabetes quality measures, adjusting for patient and provider characteristics and patient-level clustering. RESULTS: Most patients (72%) used messaging, and those who made frequent visits were also more likely to message. Given visit frequency, no (vs. any) messaging was negatively associated with the likelihood of meeting an HbA1c target of <8% (64 mmol/mol) (odds ratio [OR] 0.83 [95% CI 0.77, 0.90]). Among message users, additional messages (vs. 1) were associated with better outcome (two more messages: OR 1.17 [95% CI 1.06, 1.28]; three more messages: 1.38 [1.25, 1.53]; four more messages: 1.55 [1.43, 1.69]). The relationship was stronger for noninsulin users. Message frequency was also positively associated, but to a smaller extent, with process measures (e.g., eye examination). Physician-initiated messages had effects similar to those for patient-initiated messages. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes frequently used secure messaging for medical advice in addition to routine visits to care providers. Messaging was positively associated with better diabetes management in a large community outpatient practice.
OBJECTIVE: Internet-based secure messaging between patients and providers through a patient portal is now common in the practice of modern medicine. There is limited evidence on how messaging is associated with use and clinical quality measures among patients with type 2 diabetes. We examine whether messaging with physicians for medical advice is associated with fewer face-to-face visits and better diabetes management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with diabetes who were enrolled in an online portal of an outpatient health care organization in 2011-2014 were studied (N = 37,762 patient-years). Messages from/to primary care physicians or diabetes-related specialists for medical advice were considered. We estimated the association of messaging with diabetes quality measures, adjusting for patient and provider characteristics and patient-level clustering. RESULTS: Most patients (72%) used messaging, and those who made frequent visits were also more likely to message. Given visit frequency, no (vs. any) messaging was negatively associated with the likelihood of meeting an HbA1c target of <8% (64 mmol/mol) (odds ratio [OR] 0.83 [95% CI 0.77, 0.90]). Among message users, additional messages (vs. 1) were associated with better outcome (two more messages: OR 1.17 [95% CI 1.06, 1.28]; three more messages: 1.38 [1.25, 1.53]; four more messages: 1.55 [1.43, 1.69]). The relationship was stronger for noninsulin users. Message frequency was also positively associated, but to a smaller extent, with process measures (e.g., eye examination). Physician-initiated messages had effects similar to those for patient-initiated messages. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with diabetes frequently used secure messaging for medical advice in addition to routine visits to care providers. Messaging was positively associated with better diabetes management in a large community outpatient practice.
Authors: Cheryl A Vamos; Stacey B Griner; Claire Kirchharr; Shana M Green; Rita DeBate; Ellen M Daley; Rocio B Quinonez; Kim A Boggess; Tom Jacobs; Steve Christiansen Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Consuela C Yousef; Teresa M Salgado; Ali Farooq; Keisha Burnett; Laura E McClelland; Laila C Abu Esba; Hani S Alhamdan; Sahal Khoshhal; Ibrahim Aldossary; Omar A Alyas; Jonathan P DeShazo Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Jennifer Elston Lafata; Carrie A Miller; Deirdre A Shires; Karen Dyer; Scott M Ratliff; Michelle Schreiber Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Ronald W Gimbel; Lior M Rennert; Paul Crawford; Jeanette R Little; Khoa Truong; Joel E Williams; Sarah F Griffin; Lu Shi; Liwei Chen; LingLing Zhang; Jennie B Moss; Robert C Marshall; Karen W Edwards; Kristy J Crawford; Marie Hing; Amanda Schmeltz; Brandon Lumsden; Morgan Ashby; Elizabeth Haas; Kelly Palazzo Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Dawn M Heisey-Grove; Laura E McClelland; Cheryl Rathert; Alexander Tartaglia; Kevin Jackson; Jonathan P DeShazo Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Abrar Alturkistani; Ambar Qavi; Philip Emeka Anyanwu; Geva Greenfield; Felix Greaves; Ceire Costelloe Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 5.428