| Literature DB >> 28806923 |
Pui-Sze Li1, Daniel C Thomas1,2, Richard M K Saunders3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Asimina-Disepalum clade (Annonaceae subfam. Annonoideae tribe Annoneae) includes a major Neotropical-Asian biogeographical disjunction. We evaluate whether this disjunction can be explained by the Eocene boreotropics hypothesis, which relies on the existence of extensive boreotropical forests during the Late Palaeocene-Early Eocene thermal maximum (52-50 Ma), followed by disruption of boreotropical vegetation during post-Eocene cooling. Molecular dating using an uncorrelated relaxed molecular clock (UCLD) model with two fossil calibrations, ancestral range estimation, and ecological niche modelling across evolutionary time were performed. Our focus was the geographical origin of Disepalum and general biogeographic patterns within this genus. Comparison of ecological tolerance among extant species and niche reconstructions at ancestral nodes within the clade enabled insights in likely migration routes of lineages, as well as evaluating the role of bioclimatic ecological differentiation in the diversification of Disepalum within Southeast Asia.Entities:
Keywords: Ancestral area optimization; Annonaceae; Asimina; Boreotropical forests; Disepalum; Ecological niche modelling; Molecular dating; Neotropical-Asian disjunction
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28806923 PMCID: PMC5557002 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-1038-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Topological and bioclimatic variables considered for niche modelling in this study, with mean AUC values and correlation coefficients for each variable pair
| Variable | Mean AUC | ALT | Bio1 | Bio2 | Bio3 | Bio4 | Bio5 | Bio6 | Bio7 | Bio8 | Bio9 | Bio10 | Bio11 | Bio12 | Bio13 | Bio14 | Bio15 | Bio16 | Bio17 | Bio18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALTa | 0.79 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Bio1 | 0.77 | −0.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Bio2a | 0.81 | −0.16 | −0.54 | |||||||||||||||||
| Bio3 | 0.85 | 0.31 |
| −0.63 | ||||||||||||||||
| Bio4 | 0.84 | −0.31 |
| 0.66 |
| |||||||||||||||
| Bio5a | 0.87 | −0.79 | 0.17 | 0.46 | −0.29 | 0.27 | ||||||||||||||
| Bio6 | 0.83 | 0.11 |
| −0.68 |
|
| −0.09 | |||||||||||||
| Bio7a | 0.91 | −0.28 |
| 0.75 |
|
| 0.31 |
| ||||||||||||
| Bio8a | 0.82 | −0.21 | 0.60 | −0.40 | 0.41 | −0.47 | 0.19 | 0.55 | −0.48 | |||||||||||
| Bio9 | 0.81 | 0.01 |
| −0.45 | 0.77 |
| 0.07 |
|
| 0.27 | ||||||||||
| Bio10 | 0.84 | −0.77 | 0.55 | 0.02 | 0.07 | −0.11 |
| 0.32 | −0.11 | 0.43 | 0.42 | |||||||||
| Bio11 | 0.82 | 0.11 |
| −0.62 |
|
| −0.04 |
|
| 0.55 |
| 0.35 | ||||||||
| Bio12a | 0.86 | 0.18 | 0.59 | −0.61 | 0.73 | −0.68 | −0.25 | 0.68 | −0.70 | 0.22 | 0.59 | 0.06 | 0.65 | |||||||
| Bio13 | 0.83 | 0.27 | 0.65 | −0.59 | 0.71 | −0.73 | −0.22 | 0.72 | −0.74 | 0.32 | 0.60 | 0.08 | 0.71 |
| ||||||
| Bio14 | 0.89 | −0.06 | 0.25 | −0.39 | 0.43 | −0.29 | −0.18 | 0.32 | −0.35 | −0.01 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 0.28 | 0.71 | 0.36 | |||||
| Bio15a | 0.87 | 0.24 | 0.46 | −0.16 | 0.32 | −0.46 | 0.03 | 0.43 | −0.40 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.14 | 0.46 | −0.02 | 0.38 | −0.57 | ||||
| Bio16 | 0.83 | 0.26 | 0.66 | −0.60 | 0.72 | −0.74 | −0.23 | 0.73 | −0.75 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 0.08 | 0.72 |
|
| 0.41 | 0.34 | |||
| Bio17a | 0.93 | −0.06 | 0.28 | −0.41 | 0.45 | −0.31 | −0.17 | 0.35 | −0.37 | −0.01 | 0.35 | 0.06 | 0.31 | 0.74 | 0.38 |
| −0.56 | 0.43 | ||
| Bio18a | 0.84 | 0.25 | 0.52 | −0.56 | 0.59 | −0.60 | −0.32 | 0.59 | −0.63 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.02 | 0.57 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.45 | 0.18 | 0.72 | 0.47 | |
| Bio19 | 0.87 | −0.01 | 0.42 | −0.42 | 0.56 | −0.45 | −0.10 | 0.48 | −0.49 | 0.08 | 0.47 | 0.12 | 0.45 |
| 0.67 | 0.77 | −0.25 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.40 |
Abbreviations: ALT Altitude, Bio1 Annual mean temperature, Bio2 Mean diurnal range (Mean of monthly (max temperature – min temperature)), Bio3 Isothermality (Bio2/Bio7 × 100), Bio4 Temperature seasonality (standard deviation × 100), Bio5 Maximum temperature of warmest month, Bio6 Minimum temperature of coldest month, Bio7 Temperature Annual Range (Bio5–Bio6), Bio8 Mean temperature of wettest quarter, Bio9 Mean temperature of driest quarter, Bio10 Mean temperature of warmest quarter, Bio11 Mean temperature of coldest quarter, Bio12 Annual precipitation, Bio13 Precipitation of wettest month, Bio14 Precipitation of driest month, Bio15 Precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation), Bio16 Precipitation of wettest quarter, Bio17 Precipitation of driest quarter, Bio18 Precipitation of warmest quarter, Bio19 Precipitation of coldest quarter. Temperature is given in °C, precipitation in mm. Variables used to construct ecological niche models are indicated witha. Correlation coefficients ≥0.8 are indicated using bold font
Fig. 1Chronogram of the tribe Annoneae extracted from the maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree from the BEAST analysis of the Annonaceae. Nodes are posterior mean ages (Mya) with blue node bars representing the 95% HPD intervals. Numbers at nodes indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP)
Posterior age distributions of major nodes in the Annonaceae and Disepalum based on BEAST analyses, with results of ancestral range reconstructions using statistical dispersal-vicariance analysis (S-DIVA) and likelihood estimation under the dispersal-extinction-cladogenesis (DEC) model2
| Bayesian PP | Age estimates (Mya) | Ancestral area | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Node | Mean | (95% HPD) | S-DIVA | DEC | |||
| C1: Magnoliaceae stem | 1.00 | 115.7 | (119.9–112.6) | ||||
| C2: Annonaceae crown | 1.00 | 99.3 | (104.9–94.0) | ||||
| Subfam. Ambavioideae stem | 1.00 | 93.6 | (99.2–88.3) | ||||
| Subfam. Ambavioideae crown | 1.00 | 40.0 | (46.6–33.2) | ||||
| Subfam. Malmeoideae stem | 1.00 | 92.0 | (97.5–86.7) | ||||
| Subfam. Malmeoideae crown | 1.00 | 34.6 | (41.9–27.5) | ||||
| Subfam. Annonoideae crown | 1.00 | 89.3 | (94.8–84.0) | ||||
| Tribe Annoneae stem | 1.00 | 71.0 | (76.1–66.2) | ||||
| 97: Tribe Annoneae crown | 1.00 | 66.5 | (71.3–61.6) | BC | (48.3) | CF | (53.4) |
| CF | (48.1) | BC | (30.1) | ||||
| CG | (3.6) | BF | (8.5) | ||||
| CG | (7.3) | ||||||
| 50: | 1.00 | 53.4 | (60.8–46.2) | C | (100.0) | C | (85.8) |
| CF | (14.2) | ||||||
| 96: | 1.00 | 61.0 | (65.6–56.5) | BF | (48.1) | CF | (46.9) |
| F | (48.1) | BC | (25.4) | ||||
| BG | (3.7) | BF | (18.5) | ||||
| CG | (9.2) | ||||||
| 95: | 1.00 | 55.4 | (61.6–50.2) | B | (50.1) | BF | (45.0) |
| BF | (49.9) | B | (36.9) | ||||
| F | (18.2) | ||||||
| 94: | 1.00 | 52.5 | (56.9–48.1) | BF | (50.0) | BF | (47.9) |
| AB | (50.0) | B | (34.0) | ||||
| F | (18.2) | ||||||
| 93: | 1.00 | 40.0 | (44.3–35.5) | AF | (100.0) | F | (34.1) |
| AF | (25.9) | ||||||
| BF | (15.1) | ||||||
| B | (7.6) | ||||||
| AB | (6.7) | ||||||
| BE | (5.8) | ||||||
| EF | (4.9) | ||||||
| 83: | 1.00 | 9.1 | (10.6–7.6) | F | (100.0) | EF | (62.5) |
| F | (37.5) | ||||||
| 82: Subgen. | 1.00 | 3.8 | (4.6–3.0) | F | (100.0) | F | (100.0) |
| 81 | 1.00 | 3.0 | (3.8–2.2) | F | (100.0) | F | (100.0) |
| 80 | 1.00 | 1.9 | (2.5–1.3) | F | (100.0) | F | (100.0) |
| 79 | 0.79 | 3.3 | (4.1–2.6) | F | (100.0) | F | (100.0) |
| 78: Subgen. | 1.00 | 4.8 | (5.9–3.7) | EF | (100.0) | EF | (100.0) |
| 77 | 1.00 | 3.4 | (4.4–2.4) | E | (100.0) | E | (100.0) |
Node numbers correlate with those shown in Fig. 2. Fossil calibrations: C1 = Endressinia brasiliana; C2 = Futabanthus asamigawaensis
Fig. 2Ancestral area optimization by S-DIVA and DEC model in the tribe Annoneae. Pie charts at nodes represent relative frequencies of ancestral area reconstructions using S-DIVA (left) and DEC (right) optimizations; single pie chart is shown for congruent S-DIVA and DEC results. Colours in the pie charts correspond with geographical areas (see inset map) except where superimposed with letters indicating broader ancestral areas; only two areas with the highest frequency are shown, while black is used to represent aggregated minor explanations. Numbers beside pie charts represent node numbers. Geological epoch abbreviations: PL = Pliocene; P = Pleistocene. Inset: Biogeographical areas used in the S-DIVA optimization. A: North America; B: South America; C: Africa excluding Madagascar; D: Southern India and Sri Lanka; E: continental Asia including southern China, Indochina, Thailand, Myanmar and north-eastern India; F: western Malesia; and G: Southeast Asia and Australasia, east of Wallace’s line
Fig. 3Climatic variation in selected species. a Altitude. b Bio2: mean diurnal temperature range (mean of monthly temperature [maximum temperature – minimum temperature]). c Bio5: maximum temperature of warmest month. d Bio7: temperature annual range (Bio5 – Bio6). e Bio8: mean temperature of wettest quarter. f Bio12: annual precipitation. g Bio 15: precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation). h Bio 17: precipitation of driest quarter. i Bio18: precipitation of warmest quarter. Sample sizes: Annona muricata (n = 200); Asimina longifolia (n = 12); A. pygmaea (n = 10); A. pulchella (n = 10); A. rugelii (n = 10); A. speciosa (n = 10); A. obovata (n = 10); A. reticulata (n = 10); A. parviflora (n = 49); A. triloba (n = 256); Disepalum petelotii (n = 10); D. plagioneurum (n = 12); D. pulchrum (n = 16); D. platypetalum (n = 16); D. anomalum (n = 21); D. longipes (n = 11); D. aciculare (n = 10); D. coronatum (n = 28)
Fig. 4Niche models for Neotropical Asimina species derived using Maxent and ancestral reconstruction of bioclimatic envelopes by BIOCLIM. Projections of potential distribution of each species in south-eastern North America as well as Southeast Asia are presented for visual comparison with Disepalum (Fig. 5). Projections of bioclimatic tolerance of ancestral nodes on present-day climate of Southeast Asia are presented accordingly in the phylogeny. Only bioclimatic models for nodes with Bayesian posterior probability ≥0.95 are projected. See [76] for distributions of extant Asimina species
Fig. 5Niche models for Disepalum species derived using Maxent and ancestral reconstruction of bioclimatic envelopes by BIOCLIM. Projections of bioclimatic tolerance of ancestral nodes on present-day climate of Southeast Asia are presented in the phylogeny. Only bioclimatic models for nodes with Bayesian posterior probability ≥0.95 are projected. See [17] for distributions of extant Disepalum species
Fig. 6Plots obtained from detrended component analyses (DCA) based on the selected environmental variables in this study. Plots at each node display principal component results for all species within that lineage, and do not show reconstructed ancestral values. Grey: Annona muricata; blue: Asimina species; purple: species in subgen. Enicosanthellum; orange to yellow: species in subgen. Disepalum