Literature DB >> 15878126

Taxon sampling effects in molecular clock dating: an example from the African Restionaceae.

H Peter Linder1, Christopher R Hardy, Frank Rutschmann.   

Abstract

Three commonly used molecular dating methods for correction of variable rates (non-parametric rate smoothing, penalized likelihood, and Bayesian rate correction) as well as the assumption of a global molecular clock were tested for sensitivity to taxon sampling. The test dataset of 6854 basepairs for 300 terminals includes a nearly complete sample of the Restio-clade of the African Restionaceae (272 of the 288 species), as well as 26 outgroup species. Of this, nested subsets of 35, 51, 80, 120, 150, and the full 300 species were used. Molecular dating experiments with these datasets showed that all methods are sensitive to undersampling, but that this effect is more severe in analyses that use more extreme rate smoothing. Additionally, the undersampling effect is positively related to distance from the calibration node. The combined effect of undersampling and distance from the calibration node resulted in up to threefold differences in the age estimation of nodes from the same dataset with the same calibration point. We suggest that the most suitable methods are penalized likelihood and Bayesian when a global clock assumption has been rejected, as these methods are more successful at finding optimal levels of smoothing to correct for rate heterogeneity, and are less sensitive to undersampling.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15878126     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  53 in total

1.  Contrasting plant diversification histories within the Andean biodiversity hotspot.

Authors:  R Toby Pennington; Matt Lavin; Tiina Särkinen; Gwilym P Lewis; Bente B Klitgaard; Colin E Hughes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evolution of exceptional species richness among lineages of fleshy-fruited Myrtaceae.

Authors:  Ed Biffin; Eve J Lucas; Lyn A Craven; Itayguara Ribeiro da Costa; Mark G Harrington; Michael D Crisp
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Not so ancient: the extant crown group of Nothofagus represents a post-Gondwanan radiation.

Authors:  Lyn G Cook; Michael D Crisp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Northern Hemisphere plant disjunctions: a window on tertiary land bridges and climate change?

Authors:  Richard Ian Milne
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  The distribution of species diversity across a flora's component lineages: dating the Cape's 'relicts'.

Authors:  Ben H Warren; Julie A Hawkins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The Ediacaran emergence of bilaterians: congruence between the genetic and the geological fossil records.

Authors:  Kevin J Peterson; James A Cotton; James G Gehling; Davide Pisani
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Tracing the impact of the Andean uplift on Neotropical plant evolution.

Authors:  Alexandre Antonelli; Johan A A Nylander; Claes Persson; Isabel Sanmartín
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Distribution of living Cupressaceae reflects the breakup of Pangea.

Authors:  Kangshan Mao; Richard I Milne; Libing Zhang; Yanling Peng; Jianquan Liu; Philip Thomas; Robert R Mill; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Performance of relaxed-clock methods in estimating evolutionary divergence times and their credibility intervals.

Authors:  Fabia U Battistuzzi; Alan Filipski; S Blair Hedges; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Plant species radiations: where, when, why?

Authors:  Hans Peter Linder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.