| Literature DB >> 28804985 |
Marta Ferrer-García1, José Gutiérrez-Maldonado1, Joana Pla-Sanjuanelo1, Ferran Vilalta-Abella1, Giuseppe Riva2, Massimo Clerici3, Joan Ribas-Sabaté4, Alexis Andreu-Gracia4, Fernando Fernandez-Aranda5, Laura Forcano5, Nadine Riesco5, Isabel Sánchez5, Neli Escandón-Nagel6, Osane Gomez-Tricio7, Virginia Tena8, Antonios Dakanalis3,9.
Abstract
A question that arises from the literature on therapy is whether second-level treatment is effective for patients with recurrent binge eating who fail first-level treatment. It has been shown that subjects who do not stop binge eating after an initial structured cognitive-behavioural treatment (CBT) programme benefit from additional CBT (A-CBT) sessions; however, it has been suggested that these resistant patients would benefit even more from cue exposure therapy (CET) targeting features associated with poor response (e.g. urge to binge in response to a cue and anxiety experienced in the presence of binge-related cues). We assessed the effectiveness of virtual reality-CET as a second-level treatment strategy for 64 patients with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder who had been treated with limited results after using a structured CBT programme, in comparison with A-CBT. The significant differences observed between the two groups at post-treatment in dimensional (behavioural and attitudinal features, anxiety, food craving) and categorical (abstinence rates) outcomes highlighted the superiority of virtual reality-CET over A-CBT.Entities:
Keywords: binge eating disorders; bulimia nervosa; cue exposure; treatment; virtual reality
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28804985 DOI: 10.1002/erv.2538
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Eat Disord Rev ISSN: 1072-4133