| Literature DB >> 28804438 |
Li-Han Chen1, Yi-Wen Chien2, Chung-Tiang Liang3, Ching-Hung Chan4, Meng-Han Fan4, Hui-Yu Huang4.
Abstract
Background: A wealth of research has reported on the anti-obesity effects of green tea extract (GTE). Although browning of white adipose tissue (WAT) has been reported to attenuate obesity, no study has disclosed the effects of GTE on browning in Sprague Dawley rats.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-obesity; beige adipose tissue; browning of white adipose tissue; green tea extract; pathways of browning
Year: 2017 PMID: 28804438 PMCID: PMC5533130 DOI: 10.1080/16546628.2017.1347480
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Nutr Res ISSN: 1654-661X Impact factor: 3.894
Ingredient composition of the diets fed to rats.
| Ingredient composition | Normal diet | High-energy diet |
|---|---|---|
| Corn starch | 46.23% | 4.50% |
| Dextrin | 15.38% | 1.49% |
| Casein-vitamin free | 13.89% | 13.96% |
| Sucrose | 9.92% | 27.89% |
| Fructose | 0.00% | 19.91% |
| Powdered cellulose | 4.96% | 4.70% |
| Soybean Oil | 3.97% | 21.90% |
| AIN 93M Mineral Mix | 3.47% | 3.47% |
| AIN 93 Vitamin Mix | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| Choline bitartrate | 0.23% | 0.23% |
| L-Cystine | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| t-Butylhydroquinone | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| kcal/g | 3.8 | 4.50 |
Primer sequences used in the RT-qPCR.
| Gene | Gene accession numbers | Forward primers | Reverse primers |
|---|---|---|---|
| PPAR-γ | NM_013124.3 | GACCTCTCTGTGATGGATGAC | TCGCACTTTGGTATTCTTGGA |
| PRDM-16 | NM_001291029.1 | GCAGACCCTGTGGGAGTCCTGAAA | GCTCCCCTGTGTGTGTCCTCAGAT |
| BMP-7 | NM_001191856.2 | CGCTCCAAGACTCCAAAGAA | GGTCTCGGAAGCTAACATACAG |
| FGF-21 | NM_130752.1 | CAACAACCAGATGGAACTCTCTA | GGTACACATTGTATCCGTCCTT |
| PGC-1α | AY237127.1 | GCCGGAGCAATCTGAGTTAT | GATCACCAAACAGCCGTAGA |
| TLE-3 | NM_053400.1 | GATAGGCAGATGGACAGACAAG | GAGAAGATGGAGCAGAGAAACC |
| UCP-1 | NM_012682.2 | AGGGTTTGCGCCTTCTTT | GGGACTTCATCAGCTCTTTCTT |
| CPT-1 | NM_031559.2 | CGGAGCCAGGAGATATAGATAGA | GAATCTGACTGGGTGGGATTAG |
| CIDEA | NM_001170467.1 | GGACACAGAGGAGTTCTTTCAG | CGAAGGTGACTCTGGCTATTC |
| Leptin | NM_013076.3 | GGTTTCGTGGTGCTGACTAA | CACATCCTGTTCCGACTCTTAC |
| Adiponectin | BC092565.1 | AAGTCTGGCTCCAAGTGTATG | GGTAGAGAAGGAAGCCTGTAAAT |
| β-actin | NM_031144.3 | ACAGGATGCAGAAGGAGATTAC | ACAGTGAGGCCAGGATAGA |
Effects of GTE on the body weight, diet intake, food efficiency, and serum biochemical parameters in HED-fed rats.
| C | HE | 1X | 2X | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total food intake (g)/rat | 1386.7 ± 13.4a | 1382.0 ± 18.9a | 1377.9 ± 18.0a | 1376.2 ± 19.1a |
| Increase of BW/rat | 221.2 ± 17.7a | 306.3 ± 19.6c | 252.5 ± 24.7b | 247.2 ± 16.6b |
| FCE (%) | 15.9 ± 1.3a | 22.2 ± 1.4c | 18.4 ± 1.8b | 17.9 ± 1.3b |
| TG (mg/dl) | 44.3 ± 3.0a | 79.0 ± 10.3c | 55.1 ± 7.5b | 52.1 ± 3.9b |
| TC (mg/dl) | 42.0 ± 6.4a | 69.5 ± 7.8d | 61.2 ± 6.6 c | 53.3 ± 7.5 b |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 5.5 ± 0.7a | 7.8 ± 1.2b | 6.3 ± 1.6a | 6.0 ± 0.9a |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 20.1 ± 4.0c | 13.4 ± 1.4a | 16.0 ± 1.3b | 16.1 ± 1.5b |
| FFA (μM) | 3.2 ± 1.1a | 4.9 ± 0.9b | 3.9 ± 0.5a | 3.5 ± 0.4a |
| AST (U/L) | 126.9 ± 39.4a | 224.1 ± 79.3b | 171.9 ± 13.7a | 163.1 ± 15.2a |
| ALT (U/L) | 33.1 ± 4.6a | 58.6 ± 9.7c | 47.9 ± 6.7b | 43.1 ± 11.6b |
Control, vehicle control; HE, HED vehicle control; 1X, HED with 77.5 mg/kg/day of GTE; 2X, HED with 155 mg/kg/day of GTE. All values are the mean ± SEM (n = 10 rats/group). Different superscript letters (a, b, c) indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test. BW, body weight; FCE, food conversion efficiency (Increase of BW/Total calories intake); TG, triacylglycerol; TC total cholesterol; FFA, free fatty acids; AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase.
Figure 1.Body weights in eight weeks. C; vehicle control, HE; HED vehicle control, 1X; HED with 77.5 mg/kg/day of GTE, 2X; HED with 155 mg/kg/day of GTE. Data are the mean ± SEM (n = 10 rats/group).
Effects of GTE on the mass of the EFP, RFP, MFP, and total body fat in HED-fed rats.
| C | HE | 1X | 2X | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFP (g) | 6.6 ± 0.9a | 12.4 ± 1.9c | 8.9 ± 1.5b | 7.5 ± 2.0ab |
| RFP (g) | 10.9 ± 1.a | 20.0 ± 1.7c | 14.8 ± 2.2b | 13.6 ± 1.8b |
| MFP (g) | 5.6 ± 1.2a | 9.7 ± 1.6b | 6.9 ± 1.3a | 6.3 ± 1.5a |
| Body fat percentage (%) | 5.1 ± 0.6a | 8.0 ± 0.9c | 6.6 ± 0.8b | 6.0 ± 0.8ab |
Control, vehicle control; HE, HED vehicle control; 1X, HED with 77.5 mg/kg/day of GTE; 2X, HED with 155 mg/kg/day of GTE. All values are the mean ± SEM (n = 10 rats/group). Different superscript letters (a, b, c) indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test.
Figure 2.Histological analysis of epididymal fat pads stained with hematoxylin-eosin. C; vehicle control, HE; HED vehicle control, 1X; HED with 77.5 mg/kg/day of GTE, 2X; HED with 155 mg/kg/day of GTE. (a) Sections of epididymal fat pads fixed and stained with hematoxylin-eosin to visualize adipocytes (original magnification ×200). (b) Adipocytes were analyzed with an image analysis system and quantified. All values are the mean ± SEM (n = 10 rats/group). Different superscript letters (a, b, c) indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test. Scale bar = 50μM.
Figure 3.Expressions of leptin and adiponectin in the EFPs. HE; HED vehicle control, 1X; HED with 77.5 mg/kg/day of GTE, 2X; HED with 155 mg/kg/day of GTE. All values are the mean ± SEM (n = 10 rats/group). Different superscript letters (a and b) indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test.
Figure 4.Expressions of genes related to beige transformation and thermogenesis in the EFPs. HE; HED vehicle control, 1X; HED with 77.5 mg/kg/day of GTE, 2X; HED with 155 mg/kg/day of GTE. Genes related to (a) beige transformation and (b) thermogenesis were detected by an RT-qPCR. Representative blots (c) and protein levels (d) of UCP-1 were detected using western blotting. All values are the mean ± SEM (n = 10 rats/group). Different superscript letters (a and b) indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test.