Literature DB >> 28804202

A method to extrapolate the diffuse upwelling radiance attenuation coefficient to the surface as applied to the Marine Optical Buoy (MOBY).

Kenneth J Voss1, Howard R Gordon2, Stephanie Flora3, B Carol Johnson4, Mark Yarbrough3, Michael Feinholz3, Terrence Houlihan3.   

Abstract

The upwelling radiance attenuation coefficient (KLu) in the upper 10 m of the water column can be significantly influenced by inelastic scattering processes, and thus will vary even with homogeneous water properties. The Marine Optical BuoY (MOBY), the primary vicarious calibration site for many ocean color sensors, makes measurements of the upwelling radiance (Lu) at 1 m, 5 m, and 9 m and uses these values to determine KLu and propagate the upwelling radiance directed toward the zenith, Lu, at 1 m to and through the surface. Inelastic scattering causes the KLu derived from the arm measurements to be an underestimate of the true KLu from 1 m to the surface at wavelengths greater than 575 nm, thus the derived water leaving radiance is underestimated at wavelengths longer than 575 nm. A method to correct this KLu, based on a model of the upwelling radiance including Raman scattering and chlorophyll fluorescence has been developed which corrects this bias. The model has been experimentally validated, and this technique can be applied to the MOBY data set to provide new, more accurate products at these wavelengths. When applied to a 4 month MOBY deployment, the corrected water leaving radiance, Lw, can increase by 5 % (600 nm), 10 % (650 nm) and 50 % (700 nm). This method will be used to provide additional more accurate products in the MOBY data set.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28804202      PMCID: PMC5548494          DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0235.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Atmos Ocean Technol        ISSN: 0739-0572            Impact factor:   2.075


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of numerical models for computing underwater light fields.

Authors:  C D Mobley; B Gentili; H R Gordon; Z Jin; G W Kattawar; A Morel; P Reinersman; K Stamnes; R H Stavn
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1993-12-20       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Sensor-independent approach to the vicarious calibration of satellite ocean color radiometry.

Authors:  Bryan A Franz; Sean W Bailey; P Jeremy Werdell; Charles R McClain
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Contribution of Raman scattering to water-leaving radiance: a reexamination.

Authors:  H R Gordon
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1999-05-20       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Raman scattering by pure water and seawater.

Authors:  J S Bartlett; K J Voss; S Sathyendranath; A Vodacek
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 1.980

5.  Calibration of SeaWiFS. II. Vicarious techniques.

Authors:  R E Eplee; W D Robinson; S W Bailey; D K Clark; P J Werdell; M Wang; R A Barnes; C R McClain
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2001-12-20       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Calibration of SeaWiFS. I. Direct techniques.

Authors:  R A Barnes; R E Eplee; G M Schmidt; F S Patt; C R McClain
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2001-12-20       Impact factor: 1.980

7.  Diffuse reflectance of the ocean: the theory of its augmentation by chlorophyll a fluorescence at 685 nm.

Authors:  H R Gordon
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1979-04-15       Impact factor: 1.980

8.  Effects of inelastic radiative processes on the determination of water-leaving spectral radiance from extrapolation of underwater near-surface measurements.

Authors:  Linhai Li; Dariusz Stramski; Rick A Reynolds
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 1.980

9.  Bidirectional reflectance of oceanic waters: accounting for Raman emission and varying particle scattering phase function.

Authors:  André Morel; David Antoine; Bernard Gentili
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2002-10-20       Impact factor: 1.980

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.