Literature DB >> 20861969

Comparison of numerical models for computing underwater light fields.

C D Mobley, B Gentili, H R Gordon, Z Jin, G W Kattawar, A Morel, P Reinersman, K Stamnes, R H Stavn.   

Abstract

Seven models for computing underwater radiances and irradiances by numerical solution of the radiative transfer equation are compared. The models are applied to the solution of several problems drawn from optical oceanography. The problems include highly absorbing and highly scattering waters, scattering by molecules and by particulates, stratified water, atmospheric effects, surface-wave effects, bottom effects, and Raman scattering. The models provide consistent output, with errors (resulting from Monte Carlo statistical fluctuations) in computed irradiances that are seldom larger, and are usually smaller, than the experimental errors made in measuring irradiances when using current oceanographic instrumentation. Computed radiances display somewhat larger errors.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 20861969     DOI: 10.1364/AO.32.007484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Opt        ISSN: 1559-128X            Impact factor:   1.980


  12 in total

1.  Sediment grain size estimation using airborne remote sensing, field sampling, and robust statistic.

Authors:  Elena Castillo; Raúl Pereda; Julio Manuel de Luis; Raúl Medina; Javier Viguri
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Vector radiative transfer model for coupled atmosphere and ocean systems including inelastic sources in ocean waters.

Authors:  Peng-Wang Zhai; Yongxiang Hu; David M Winker; Bryan A Franz; Jeremy Werdell; Emmanuel Boss
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Quantifying contributions to light attenuation in estuaries and coastal embayments: Application to Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island.

Authors:  Mohamed A Abdelrhman
Journal:  Estuaries Coast       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.976

4.  A method to extrapolate the diffuse upwelling radiance attenuation coefficient to the surface as applied to the Marine Optical Buoy (MOBY).

Authors:  Kenneth J Voss; Howard R Gordon; Stephanie Flora; B Carol Johnson; Mark Yarbrough; Michael Feinholz; Terrence Houlihan
Journal:  J Atmos Ocean Technol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.075

5.  Open water camouflage via 'leaky' light guides in the midwater squid Galiteuthis.

Authors:  Amanda L Holt; Alison M Sweeney
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The effect of aggregation on visibility in open water.

Authors:  Graeme D Ruxton; Sönke Johnsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Water-leaving contribution to polarized radiation field over ocean.

Authors:  Peng-Wang Zhai; Kirk Knobelspiesse; Amir Ibrahim; Bryan A Franz; Yongxiang Hu; Meng Gao; Robert Frouin
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Diatom Phytochromes Reveal the Existence of Far-Red-Light-Based Sensing in the Ocean.

Authors:  Antonio Emidio Fortunato; Marianne Jaubert; Gen Enomoto; Jean-Pierre Bouly; Raffaella Raniello; Michael Thaler; Shruti Malviya; Juliana Silva Bernardes; Fabrice Rappaport; Bernard Gentili; Marie J J Huysman; Alessandra Carbone; Chris Bowler; Maurizio Ribera d'Alcalà; Masahiko Ikeuchi; Angela Falciatore
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Bio-optical characterization of selected cyanobacteria strains present in marine and freshwater ecosystems.

Authors:  Bożena Wojtasiewicz; Joanna Stoń-Egiert
Journal:  J Appl Phycol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Trends in ocean colour and chlorophyll concentration from 1889 to 2000, worldwide.

Authors:  Marcel R Wernand; Hendrik J van der Woerd; Winfried W C Gieskes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.