Literature DB >> 28801777

An internally validated new clinical and inflammation-based prognostic score for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

R Diaz-Beveridge1, G Bruixola2, D Lorente2, J Caballero2, E Rodrigo2, Á Segura2, D Akhoundova2, A Giménez2, J Aparicio2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is a standard treatment for patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC), although the clinical benefit is heterogeneous between different pts groups. Among novel prognostic factors, a low baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (bNLR) and early-onset diarrhoea have been linked with a better prognosis.
PURPOSE: To identify prognostic factors in pts with aHCC treated with 1st-line sorafenib and to develop a new prognostic score to guide management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 145 pts bNLR, overall toxicity, early toxicity rates and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for OS was performed. The prognostic score was calculated from the coefficients found in the Cox analysis. ROC curves and pseudoR2 index were used for internal validation. Discrimination ability and calibration were tested by Harrel's c-index (HCI) and Akaike criteria (AIC).
RESULTS: The optimal bNLR cut-off for the prediction of OS was 4 (AUC 0.62). Independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis for OS were performance status (PS) (p < .0001), Child-Pugh (C-P) score (p = 0.005), early-onset diarrhoea (p = 0.006) and BNLR (0.011). The prognostic score based on these four variables was found efficient (HCI = 0.659; AIC = 1.180). Four risk groups for OS could be identified: a very low-risk (median OS = 48.6 months), a low-risk (median OS = 11.6 months), an intermediate-risk (median OS = 8.3 months) and a high-risk group (median OS = 4.4 months).
CONCLUSIONS: PS and C-P score were the main prognostic factors for OS, followed by early-onset diarrhoea and bNLR. We identified four risk groups for OS depending on these parameters. This prognostic model could be useful for patient stratification, but an external validation is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cirrhosis; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Neutrophil activation; Prognostic factors; Sorafenib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28801777     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1720-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  29 in total

1.  Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing TAE combined with Sorafenib.

Authors:  Kai Wei; Meng Wang; Wei Zhang; Han Mu; Tian-Qiang Song
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  A new prognostic classification for predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hépatocellulaire.

Authors:  S Chevret; J C Trinchet; D Mathieu; A A Rached; M Beaugrand; C Chastang
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 3.  Potentiality of immunotherapy against hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tsuchiya; Yu Sawada; Itaru Endo; Yasushi Uemura; Tetsuya Nakatsura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Skin toxicity predicts efficacy to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Masako Shomura; Tatehiro Kagawa; Koichi Shiraishi; Shunji Hirose; Yoshitaka Arase; Jun Koizumi; Tetsuya Mine
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-09-27

5.  Sorafenib for non-selected patient population with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: efficacy and safety data according to liver function.

Authors:  Jon Zugazagoitia; Aránzazu Manzano; Javier Sastre; Jose María Ladero; Javier Puente; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification.

Authors:  J M Llovet; C Brú; J Bruix
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.115

7.  Safety and efficacy of sorafenib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a single center experience.

Authors:  Esteban Rodrigo Imedio; Roberto Díaz Beveridge; Jorge Aparicio Urtasun; Gema Bruixola Campos; David Lorente Estellés; María Fonfría Esparcia; Javier Caballero Daroqui; Ángel Segura Huerta; Alejandra Giménez Ortiz; Joaquin Montalar Salcedo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Comparison of three current staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma: Japan integrated staging score, new Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging classification, and Tokyo score.

Authors:  Hobyung Chung; Masatoshi Kudo; Shunsuke Takahashi; Satoru Hagiwara; Yasuhiro Sakaguchi; Tatsuo Inoue; Yasunori Minami; Kazuomi Ueshima; Toyokazu Fukunaga; Takashi Matsunaga
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  Design and rationale for the non-interventional Global Investigation of Therapeutic DEcisions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Of its Treatment with Sorafenib (GIDEON) study.

Authors:  R Lencioni; J Marrero; A Venook; S-L Ye; M Kudo
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Identification of clinical biomarkers for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma receiving sorafenib.

Authors:  A Lamarca; O Abdel-Rahman; I Salu; M G McNamara; J W Valle; R A Hubner
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.340

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated by systemic therapy: a systematic review and critical appraisal.

Authors:  Li Li; Xiaomi Li; Wendong Li; Jinglong Chen; Wei Li; Xiaoyan Ding; Yongchao Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Relationship to the Hallmarks of Cancer, Relevant Biomarkers, and Assays to Measure Them.

Authors:  Martyn T Smith; Kathryn Z Guyton; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Alexandre Borrel; Andres Cardenas; Weihsueh A Chiu; Dean W Felsher; Catherine F Gibbons; William H Goodson; Keith A Houck; Agnes B Kane; Michele A La Merrill; Herve Lebrec; Leroy Lowe; Cliona M McHale; Sheroy Minocherhomji; Linda Rieswijk; Martha S Sandy; Hideko Sone; Amy Wang; Luoping Zhang; Lauren Zeise; Mark Fielden
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Three myths about risk thresholds for prediction models.

Authors:  Laure Wynants; Maarten van Smeden; David J McLernon; Dirk Timmerman; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ben Van Calster
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Prognostic Roles of Blood Inflammatory Markers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Taking Sorafenib. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lixing Liu; Yang Gong; Qinglin Zhang; Panpan Cai; Li Feng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.