Literature DB >> 28800286

Clinical PET Imaging in Prostate Cancer.

Kathryn L Wallitt1, Sairah R Khan1, Suraiya Dubash1, Henry H Tam1, Sameer Khan1, Tara D Barwick1.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide, with a wide spectrum of biologic behavior ranging from indolent low-risk disease to highly aggressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Conventional imaging with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scintigraphy is limited for the detection of nodal disease and distant bone metastases. In addition, advances in the available therapeutic options, both localized and systemic, drive the requirement for precise diagnostic and prognostic tools to refine the individual therapeutic approach at various times in the management of patients with prostate cancer. Positron emission tomography (PET) has a rapidly evolving role in the assessment of prostate cancer, particularly in the scenario of biochemical relapse. Fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose, the most widely available PET tracer, has limitations, particularly in indolent prostate cancer. In the past decade, several PET tracers with specific molecular targets have reached the clinical domain. These tracers include 18F-sodium fluoride, which is a bone-specific biomarker of osteoblastic activity; 18F-choline and carbon 11-choline, which are directed at cell membrane metabolism; gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands; and, more recently, an amino acid analog, 18F-fluciclovine (anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid; also known as FACBC), which is also directed at cell membrane turnover. The mechanisms of actions of the clinically available PET tracers are reviewed, as well as their role in the imaging of prostate cancer with reference to relevant guidelines and the technical and imaging pearls and pitfalls of these tracers. ©RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28800286     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2017170035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  22 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in clinical translation research for diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sagnik Sengupta; Mena Asha Krishnan; Sudeshna Chattopadhyay; Venkatesh Chelvam
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-04-02

Review 2.  Dual contribution of the mTOR pathway and of the metabolism of amino acids in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alejandro Schcolnik-Cabrera; Daniel Juárez-López
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 7.051

3.  Ultrasmall Renally Clearable Silica Nanoparticles Target Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Feng Chen; Kai Ma; Li Zhang; Brian Madajewski; Melik Z Turker; Fabio Gallazzi; Kiara Cruickshank; Xiuli Zhang; Pocharapong Jenjitranant; Karim A Touijer; Thomas P Quinn; Pat Zanzonico; Ulrich Wiesner; Michelle S Bradbury
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 4.  Optimizing the diagnosis and management of ductal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Weranja Ranasinghe; Daniel D Shapiro; Miao Zhang; Tharakeswara Bathala; Nora Navone; Timothy C Thompson; Bradley Broom; Ana Aparicio; Shi-Ming Tu; Chad Tang; John W Davis; Louis Pisters; Brian F Chapin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  PET Use in Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis.

Authors:  Naresh Damuka; Meghana Dodda; Kiran Kumar Solingapuram Sai
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Modular Medical Imaging Agents Based on Azide-Alkyne Huisgen Cycloadditions: Synthesis and Pre-Clinical Evaluation of 18 F-Labeled PSMA-Tracers for Prostate Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Verena I Böhmer; Wiktor Szymanski; Keimpe-Oeds van den Berg; Chantal Mulder; Piermichele Kobauri; Hugo Helbert; Dion van der Born; Friederike Reeβing; Anja Huizing; Marten Klopstra; Douwe F Samplonius; Ines F Antunes; Jürgen W A Sijbesma; Gert Luurtsema; Wijnand Helfrich; Ton J Visser; Ben L Feringa; Philip H Elsinga
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.236

7.  Simultaneous 18F-fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Morteza Esmaeili; Nassim Tayari; Tom Scheenen; Mattijs Elschot; Elise Sandsmark; Helena Bertilsson; Arend Heerschap; Kirsten M Selnæs; Tone F Bathen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  [Positron emission tomography with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for primary staging of prostate cancer].

Authors:  Ergela Hasa; Thomas Langbein; Matthias Eiber; Karina Knorr
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  An international expert opinion statement on the utility of PET/MR for imaging of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Jad S Husseini; Bárbara Juarez Amorim; Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Vinay Prabhu; David Groshar; Lale Umutlu; Ken Herrmann; Lina García Cañamaque; José Ramón García Garzón; William E Palmer; Pedram Heidari; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih; Jacob Sosna; Cristina Matushita; Juliano Cerci; Marcelo Queiroz; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa; Ronald J H Borra; Thomas C Kwee; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Laura Evangelista; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo; Andrea Soricelli; Christian Herold; Andrea Laghi; Marius Mayerhoefer; Umar Mahmood; Ciprian Catana; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Bruce Rosen; Onofrio A Catalano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Novel Target Opportunities in Non-Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie Gleicher; Baylee A Porter; Disharee Nath; Guanqun Li; Rakesh Khanna; Hanan Goldberg; Marcin Kortylewski; Gennady Bratslavsky; Leszek Kotula
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.