OBJECTIVE: Women with a history of preeclampsia are at an increased risk of hypertension and structural brain changes. However, the combined effect of both preeclampsia and late-life hypertension on brain structural changes is not known and was investigated in this study. METHODS: Participants were identified from the population-based Rochester Epidemiology Project cohort. Four groups of women were recruited and investigated in this study: first, women with a history of normotensive pregnancy who have late-life hypertension (n = 8, median age = 62), second, women with a history of normotensive pregnancy who do not have late-life hypertension (n = 32, median age = 59), third, women with a history of preeclampsia who have late-life hypertension (n = 24, median age = 60), and fourth, women with a history of preeclampsia who do not have late-life hypertension (n = 16, median age = 57). Cerebrovascular disease lesions on MRI, and total gray matter volumes were assessed. RESULTS: Total gray matter volumes were smaller in women with a history of preeclampsia and late-life hypertension compared with the other groups. Voxel-based morphometry demonstrated that the volume changes were localized to the posterior brain regions, particularly the occipital lobe gray matter in women with a history of preeclampsia and late-life hypertension. CONCLUSION: Having late-life hypertension superimposed on a history of preeclampsia affects the brain structure differently than having either a history of preeclampsia alone or a history of normotensive pregnancy either with or without late-life hypertension.
OBJECTIVE:Women with a history of preeclampsia are at an increased risk of hypertension and structural brain changes. However, the combined effect of both preeclampsia and late-life hypertension on brain structural changes is not known and was investigated in this study. METHODS:Participants were identified from the population-based Rochester Epidemiology Project cohort. Four groups of women were recruited and investigated in this study: first, women with a history of normotensive pregnancy who have late-life hypertension (n = 8, median age = 62), second, women with a history of normotensive pregnancy who do not have late-life hypertension (n = 32, median age = 59), third, women with a history of preeclampsia who have late-life hypertension (n = 24, median age = 60), and fourth, women with a history of preeclampsia who do not have late-life hypertension (n = 16, median age = 57). Cerebrovascular disease lesions on MRI, and total gray matter volumes were assessed. RESULTS: Total gray matter volumes were smaller in women with a history of preeclampsia and late-life hypertension compared with the other groups. Voxel-based morphometry demonstrated that the volume changes were localized to the posterior brain regions, particularly the occipital lobe gray matter in women with a history of preeclampsia and late-life hypertension. CONCLUSION: Having late-life hypertension superimposed on a history of preeclampsia affects the brain structure differently than having either a history of preeclampsia alone or a history of normotensive pregnancy either with or without late-life hypertension.
Authors: Tom Jeerakathil; Philip A Wolf; Alexa Beiser; John K Hald; Rhoda Au; Carlos S Kase; Joseph M Massaro; Charles DeCarli Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Natasa M Milic; Tracey L Weissgerber; Wendy M White; Kejal Kantarci; Thomas H Mosley; B Gwen Windham; Brittany N Simpson; Stephen T Turner; Vesna D Garovic Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2016-02
Authors: F E de Leeuw; J C de Groot; E Achten; M Oudkerk; L M Ramos; R Heijboer; A Hofman; J Jolles; J van Gijn; M M Breteler Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Gerbrand A Zoet; Maria P H Koster; Birgitta K Velthuis; Christianne J M de Groot; Angela H E M Maas; Bart C J M Fauser; Arie Franx; Bas B van Rijn Journal: Maturitas Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: K Kantarci; S D Weigand; S A Przybelski; M M Shiung; J L Whitwell; S Negash; D S Knopman; B F Boeve; P C O'Brien; R C Petersen; C R Jack Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S M Resnick; M A Espeland; S A Jaramillo; C Hirsch; M L Stefanick; A M Murray; J Ockene; C Davatzikos Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-01-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Limor Raz; M Jayachandran; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Timothy G Lesnick; Samantha M Wille; Matthew C Murphy; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Prashanthi Vemuri; Clifford R Jack; Virginia M Miller; Kejal Kantarci Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M W Vernooij; A van der Lugt; M A Ikram; P A Wielopolski; W J Niessen; A Hofman; G P Krestin; M M B Breteler Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J P Beckman; J J Camp; B D Lahr; K R Bailey; A E Kearns; V D Garovic; M Jayachandran; V M Miller; D R Holmes Journal: Climacteric Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 3.005
Authors: Lina Bergman; Pablo Torres-Vergara; Jeffrey Penny; Johan Wikström; Maria Nelander; Jose Leon; Mary Tolcher; James M Roberts; Anna-Karin Wikström; Carlos Escudero Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Kathleen B Miller; Virginia M Miller; Ronée E Harvey; Sushant M Ranadive; Michael J Joyner; Jill N Barnes Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Kenji J Maeda; Daniel M McClung; Kurt C Showmaker; Junie P Warrington; Michael J Ryan; Michael R Garrett; Jennifer M Sasser Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Mary C Wallingford; Ciara Benson; Nicholas W Chavkin; Michael T Chin; Martin G Frasch Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 4.755