Michelle M Mielke1, Natasa M Milic1, Tracey L Weissgerber1, Wendy M White1, Kejal Kantarci1, Thomas H Mosley1, B Gwen Windham1, Brittany N Simpson1, Stephen T Turner1, Vesna D Garovic2. 1. From the Departments of Health Sciences Research and Neurology (M.M.M.), Division of Nephrology and Hypertension (N.M.M., T.L.W., S.T.T., V.D.G.), Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (W.M.W.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Biostatistics, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia (N.M.M.); and Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson (T.H.M., B.G.W., B.N.S.). 2. From the Departments of Health Sciences Research and Neurology (M.M.M.), Division of Nephrology and Hypertension (N.M.M., T.L.W., S.T.T., V.D.G.), Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (W.M.W.), and Department of Radiology (K.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Biostatistics, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia (N.M.M.); and Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson (T.H.M., B.G.W., B.N.S.). Garovic.vesna@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypertensive pregnancy disorders have been associated with subjective cognitive complaints or brain white-matter lesions 5 to 10 years after the hypertensive pregnancy. The long-term effects of hypertensive pregnancies on brain structure and cognitive function remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 1279 women who participated in the Family Blood Pressure Project Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA) study. As part of the ancillary Genetics of Microangiopathic Brain Injury (GMBI) study, a neurocognitive battery was administered; 1075 also had a brain magnetic resonance imaging. A history of a hypertensive pregnancy disorder was obtained by a self-report using a validated questionnaire. Linear models fit with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the association between hypertensive pregnancy disorders and cognition, adjusting for age, race, education, body mass index, smoking, current hypertension, hypertension duration, and family history of hypertension. Regression models for the brain magnetic resonance imaging outcomes also were adjusted for total intracranial volume. Women with histories of hypertensive pregnancy disorders performed worse on all measures of processing speed (Digital Symbol Substitution Test [mean score, 41.2 versus 43.4; P=0.005], Trail Making Test Part A [mean seconds, 45.1 versus 42.2; P=0.035], and Stroop [mean score, 173.9 versus 181.0; P=0.002]) and had smaller brain volumes compared with women with histories of normotensive pregnancies (286 versus 297; P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive pregnancy disorders are associated with worse performance on tests of processing speed and smaller brain volumes decades later. Population-based studies are needed to provide critical insight as to the contribution of hypertensive pregnancies to risk of cognitive decline and dementia.
BACKGROUND:Hypertensive pregnancy disorders have been associated with subjective cognitive complaints or brain white-matter lesions 5 to 10 years after the hypertensive pregnancy. The long-term effects of hypertensive pregnancies on brain structure and cognitive function remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 1279 women who participated in the Family Blood Pressure Project Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA) study. As part of the ancillary Genetics of Microangiopathic Brain Injury (GMBI) study, a neurocognitive battery was administered; 1075 also had a brain magnetic resonance imaging. A history of a hypertensive pregnancy disorder was obtained by a self-report using a validated questionnaire. Linear models fit with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the association between hypertensive pregnancy disorders and cognition, adjusting for age, race, education, body mass index, smoking, current hypertension, hypertension duration, and family history of hypertension. Regression models for the brain magnetic resonance imaging outcomes also were adjusted for total intracranial volume. Women with histories of hypertensive pregnancy disorders performed worse on all measures of processing speed (Digital Symbol Substitution Test [mean score, 41.2 versus 43.4; P=0.005], Trail Making Test Part A [mean seconds, 45.1 versus 42.2; P=0.035], and Stroop [mean score, 173.9 versus 181.0; P=0.002]) and had smaller brain volumes compared with women with histories of normotensive pregnancies (286 versus 297; P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS:Hypertensive pregnancy disorders are associated with worse performance on tests of processing speed and smaller brain volumes decades later. Population-based studies are needed to provide critical insight as to the contribution of hypertensive pregnancies to risk of cognitive decline and dementia.
Authors: Tracey L Weissgerber; Stephen T Turner; Kent R Bailey; Thomas H Mosley; Sharon L R Kardia; Heather J Wiste; Virginia M Miller; Iftikhar J Kullo; Vesna D Garovic Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: I Skoog; B Lernfelt; S Landahl; B Palmertz; L A Andreasson; L Nilsson; G Persson; A Odén; A Svanborg Journal: Lancet Date: 1996-04-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ingrid Brussé; Johannes Duvekot; Joran Jongerling; Eric Steegers; Inge De Koning Journal: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Date: 2008 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Annet M Aukes; Ineke Wessel; Albertien M Dubois; Jan G Aarnoudse; Gerda G Zeeman Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: C R Jack; P C O'Brien; D W Rettman; M M Shiung; Y Xu; R Muthupillai; A Manduca; R Avula; B J Erickson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Mekala R Raman; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Samantha M Zuk; Matthew L Senjem; Wendy M White; Julie A Fields; Michelle M Mielke; Timothy G Lesnick; Kent R Bailey; Clifford R Jack; Virginia M Miller; Vesna D Garovic; Kejal Kantarci Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Patricia D Koman; Kelly A Hogan; Natalie Sampson; Rebecca Mandell; Chris M Coombe; Myra M Tetteh; Yolanda R Hill-Ashford; Donele Wilkins; Marya G Zlatnik; Rita Loch-Caruso; Amy J Schulz; Tracey J Woodruff Journal: World Med Health Policy Date: 2018-03-12
Authors: Lina Bergman; Pablo Torres-Vergara; Jeffrey Penny; Johan Wikström; Maria Nelander; Jose Leon; Mary Tolcher; James M Roberts; Anna-Karin Wikström; Carlos Escudero Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Rebecca A Nebel; Neelum T Aggarwal; Lisa L Barnes; Aimee Gallagher; Jill M Goldstein; Kejal Kantarci; Monica P Mallampalli; Elizabeth C Mormino; Laura Scott; Wai Haung Yu; Pauline M Maki; Michelle M Mielke Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 21.566