Literature DB >> 28799874

Limitations of multidetector computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury.

Ramesh Grandhi1, Gregory M Weiner2, Nitin Agarwal2, David M Panczykowski2, William J Ares2, Jesse S Rodriguez1, Jonathan A Gelfond3, John G Myers4, Louis H Alarcon5, David O Okonkwo2, Brian T Jankowitz2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) following trauma carry risk for morbidity and mortality. Since patients with BCVI are often asymptomatic at presentation and neurological sequelae often occur within 72 hours, timely diagnosis is essential. Multidetector CT angiography (CTA) has been shown to be a noninvasive, cost-effective, reliable means of screening; however, the false-positive rate of CTA in diagnosing patients with BCVI represents a key drawback. Therefore, the authors assessed the role of DSA in the screening of BCVI when utilizing CTA as the initial screening modality. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients who experienced BCVI between 2013 and 2015 at 2 Level I trauma centers. All patients underwent CTA screening for BCVI according to the updated Denver Screening Criteria. Patients who were diagnosed with BCVI on CTA underwent confirmatory digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Patient demographics, screening indication, BCVI grade on CTA and DSA, and laboratory values were collected. Comparison of false-positive rates stratified by BCVI grade on CTA was performed using the chi-square test. RESULTS A total of 140 patients (64% males, mean age 50 years) with 156 cerebrovascular blunt injuries to the carotid and/or vertebral arteries were identified. After comparison with DSA findings, CTA findings were incorrect in 61.5% of vessels studied, and the overall CTA false-positive rates were 47.4% of vessels studied and 47.9% of patients screened. The positive predictive value (PPV) for CTA was higher among worse BCVI subtypes on initial imaging (PPV 76% and 97%, for BCVI Grades II and IV, respectively) compared with Grade I injuries (PPV 30%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In the current series, multidetector CTA as a screening test for blunt cerebrovascular injury had a high-false positive rate, especially in patients with Grade I BCVI. Given a false-positive rate of 47.9% with an estimated average of 132 patients per year screening positive for BCVI with CTA, approximately 63 patients per year would potentially be treated unnecessarily with antithrombotic therapy at a busy United States Level I trauma center. The authors' data support the use of DSA after positive findings on CTA in patients with suspected BCVI. DSA as an adjunctive test in patients with positive CTA findings allows for increased diagnostic accuracy in correctly diagnosing BCVI while minimizing risk from unnecessary antithrombotic therapy in polytrauma patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCVI = blunt cerebrovascular injury; CA = carotid artery; CCA = common CA; CTA = CT angiography; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; ICA = internal CA; PPV = positive predictive value; VA = vertebral artery; blunt cerebrovascular injury; computed tomography angiography; digital subtraction angiography; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28799874     DOI: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS163264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  7 in total

1.  Blunt Cerebrovascular Artery Injury and Stroke in Severely Injured Patients: An International Multicenter Analysis: Reply.

Authors:  Christian Weber; Rolf Lefering; Philipp Kobbe; Klemens Horst; Miguel Pishnamaz; Richard Sellei; Frank Hildebrand; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Blunt Cerebrovascular Artery Injury and Stroke in Severely Injured Patients: An International Multicenter Analysis.

Authors:  Ajay Malhotra; Xiao Wu; Kimberly Seifert; Long Tu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Vertebral artery occlusion associated with blunt traumatic cervical spine injury.

Authors:  Youhei Nakamura; Kenji Kusakabe; Shota Nakao; Yasushi Hagihara; Tetsuya Matsuoka
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2021-08-12

Review 4.  Endovascular treatment of blunt injury of the extracranial internal carotid artery: the prospect and dilemma.

Authors:  Guangming Wang; Chao Li; Jianmin Piao; Baofeng Xu; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  European Society of Emergency Radiology: guideline on radiological polytrauma imaging and service (short version).

Authors:  Stefan Wirth; Julian Hebebrand; Raffaella Basilico; Ferco H Berger; Ana Blanco; Cem Calli; Maureen Dumba; Ulrich Linsenmaier; Fabian Mück; Konraad H Nieboer; Mariano Scaglione; Marc-André Weber; Elizabeth Dick
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-12-10

Review 6.  Current Concepts in Imaging Diagnosis and Screening of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries.

Authors:  Tiffany Y So; Apurva Sawhney; Lei Wang; Yi Xiang J Wang
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-02-07

7.  Stroke Secondary to Traumatic Carotid Artery Injury - A Case Report.

Authors:  Zoltán Bajkó; Smaranda Maier; Anca Moţăţăianu; Rodica Bălaşa; Smaranda Vasiu; Adina Stoian; Sebastian Andone
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2018-02-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.