| Literature DB >> 28798309 |
Honglei Wang1, Na Deng2, Duoyang Wu2, Shu Hu2.
Abstract
A comprehensive understanding of how microbial associated with nitrogen (N) cycling respond to artificial vegetation restoration is still lacking, particularly in arid to semi-arid degraded ecosystems. We compared soil net N mineralization rates and the abundance of bacteria, archaea, and eleven N microbial genes on the northern Loess Plateau of China during the process of artificial vegetation restoration. The quantitative relationships between net N mineralization rates and N microbial genes were determined. We observed a significant difference of net transformation rates of NH4+-N (Ra), NO3--N (Rd), and total mineralization (Rm), which rapidly decreased in 10-year soils and steadily increased in the 10-30-year soils. Different N functional microbial groups responded to artificial vegetation restoration distinctly and differentially, especially for denitrifying bacteria. Stepwise regression analysis suggested that Ra was collectively controlled by AOA-amoA and Archaea; Rd was jointly governed by narG, napA, nxrA, and bacreria; and Rm was jointly controlled by napA, narG, nirK, nirS, norB, nosZ, and nxrA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28798309 PMCID: PMC5552692 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08016-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Soil physicochemical properties during the process of artificial vegetation restoration.
| Plots | 0-y | AVR-10-year | AVR-20-year | AVR-30-year | AVR-40-year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic C (g kg−1) | 3.27 ± 0.12e | 3.69 ± 0.42d | 4.09 ± 0.18c | 5.03 ± 0.36b | 8.52 ± 1.27a |
| Total N (g kg−1) | 0.52 ± 0.06d | 0.54 ± 0.02c | 0.54 ± 0.06bc | 0.57 ± 0.03b | 0.88 ± 0.11a |
| NO3 –N (mg kg−1) | 4.23 ± 0.09d | 4.18 ± 0.16bc | 4.19 ± 0.20c | 4.46 ± 0.10b | 5.21 ± 0.13a |
| NH4 +-N (mg kg−1) | 9.93 ± 0.72b | 9.73 ± 0.63c | 13.26 ± 0.25a | 8.29 ± 0.18d | 7.97 ± 0.07e |
| pH | 8.47 ± 0.02c | 8.70 ± 0.02a | 8.73 ± 0.03a | 8.72 ± 0.02a | 8.55 ± 0.15b |
| Bulk density (g cm−1) | 1.30 ± 0.01a | 1.23 ± 0.01b | 1.12 ± 0.00c | 1.04 ± 0.04d | 0.94 ± 0.02e |
| Water content (%) | 18.25 ± 0.04a | 16.86 ± 0.11b | 12.26 ± 0.04e | 12.41 ± 0.03d | 14.67 ± 0.05c |
Values are means ± standard error (n = 3). AVR: artificial vegetation restoration. Capital letters denote significant differences between sites (P < 0.05, ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD) for each variable.
Figure 1Net transformation rates of Ra (NH4 +-N), Rd (NO3 −-N), and total mineralization (Rm) during artificial vegetation restoration. Values are means ± standard error (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among soils for the individual variables based on a one-way ANOVA followed by an LSD test.
Figure 2The absolute abundances of bacteria, archaea, and nitrogen functional genes during artificial vegetation restoration. (a) Bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA; (b) AOA-amoA, AOB-amoA, and nxrA; (c) narG and napA; (d) nirK and nirS; (e) nosZ and norB; and (f) apr and nifH. The absolute abundances (copies g−1) are shown on log10 scale (Y-axis). Standard deviations of three replicates are indicated by error bars. Invisible error bars indicate that the standard deviations are smaller than the marker size.
Figure 3The relative abundance of nitrogen functional genes during artificial vegetation restoration. (The relative abundance was defined as the percentage of absolute abundance of a nitrogen functional gene divided by the absolute abundance of bacteria and archaea).
Figure 4The relative richness of nitrogen functional genes during artificial vegetation restoration. (The relative richness was defined as the percentage of absolute abundance of a nitrogen functional gene divided by the absolute abundance of all nitrogen functional genes).
Figure 5Principal component analysis of soil properties (Bulk density (BD), pH, total nitrogen (TN), organic carbon (OC), NH4 +-N, NO3 −-N, water content (WC), bacterial 16S rRNA (bacteria), archaeal 16S rRNA (archaea), and eleven N functional genes (i.e., AOA-amoA, AOB-amoA, nxrA, narG, napA, nirK, nirS, norB, nosZ, apr, and nifH), along the artificial vegetation restoration. The first two PCA axes explain 74.34% of total variance.
Quantitative response relationships between net N transformation rates (mg N kg−1 d−1) and functional gene abundance (copies g−1) during the process of artificial vegetation restoration.
| Stepwise regression models (equations) |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 38.83 | 0.928 | 0.008 |
|
| 202.17 | 0.995 | 0.005 |
|
| 73.078 | 0.987 | 0.013 |