BACKGROUND: Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous disease and, although increasingly recognized in clinical practice, there is a lack of widely accepted diagnostic criteria. We sought to identify novel genetic causes of LVNC and describe genotype-phenotype correlations. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 190 patients from 174 families with left ventricular hypertrabeculation (LVHT) or LVNC were referred for cardiac magnetic resonance and whole-exome sequencing. A total of 425 control individuals were included to identify variants of interest (VOIs). We found an excess of 138 VOIs in 102 (59%) unrelated patients in 54 previously identified LVNC or other known cardiomyopathy genes. VOIs were found in 68 of 90 probands with LVNC and 34 of 84 probands with LVHT (76% and 40%, respectively; P<0.001). We identified 0, 1, and ≥2 VOIs in 72, 74, and 28 probands, respectively. We found increasing number of VOIs in a patient strongly correlated with several markers of disease severity, including ratio of noncompacted to compacted myocardium (P<0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.01). The presence of sarcomeric gene mutations was associated with increased occurrence of late gadolinium enhancement (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: LVHT and LVNC likely represent a continuum of genotypic disease with differences in severity and variable phenotype explained, in part, by the number of VOIs and whether mutations are present in sarcomeric or nonsarcomeric genes. Presence of VOIs is common in patients with LVHT. Our findings expand the current clinical and genetic diagnostic approaches for patients with LVHT and LVNC.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous disease and, although increasingly recognized in clinical practice, there is a lack of widely accepted diagnostic criteria. We sought to identify novel genetic causes of LVNC and describe genotype-phenotype correlations. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 190 patients from 174 families with left ventricular hypertrabeculation (LVHT) or LVNC were referred for cardiac magnetic resonance and whole-exome sequencing. A total of 425 control individuals were included to identify variants of interest (VOIs). We found an excess of 138 VOIs in 102 (59%) unrelated patients in 54 previously identified LVNC or other known cardiomyopathy genes. VOIs were found in 68 of 90 probands with LVNC and 34 of 84 probands with LVHT (76% and 40%, respectively; P<0.001). We identified 0, 1, and ≥2 VOIs in 72, 74, and 28 probands, respectively. We found increasing number of VOIs in a patient strongly correlated with several markers of disease severity, including ratio of noncompacted to compacted myocardium (P<0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.01). The presence of sarcomeric gene mutations was associated with increased occurrence of late gadolinium enhancement (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS:LVHT and LVNC likely represent a continuum of genotypic disease with differences in severity and variable phenotype explained, in part, by the number of VOIs and whether mutations are present in sarcomeric or nonsarcomeric genes. Presence of VOIs is common in patients with LVHT. Our findings expand the current clinical and genetic diagnostic approaches for patients with LVHT and LVNC.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Barry J Maron; Jeffrey A Towbin; Gaetano Thiene; Charles Antzelevitch; Domenico Corrado; Donna Arnett; Arthur J Moss; Christine E Seidman; James B Young Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-03-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mihaela-Silvia Amzulescu; Michel F Rousseau; Sylvie A Ahn; Laurianne Boileau; Christophe de Meester de Ravenstein; David Vancraeynest; Agnes Pasquet; Jean Louis Vanoverschelde; Anne-Catherine Pouleur; Bernhard L Gerber Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-07-15
Authors: Sabine Klaassen; Susanne Probst; Erwin Oechslin; Brenda Gerull; Gregor Krings; Pia Schuler; Matthias Greutmann; David Hürlimann; Mustafa Yegitbasi; Lucia Pons; Michael Gramlich; Jörg-Detlef Drenckhahn; Arnd Heuser; Felix Berger; Rolf Jenni; Ludwig Thierfelder Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christopher Stanton; Charles Bruce; Heidi Connolly; Peter Brady; Imran Syed; David Hodge; Samuel Asirvatham; Paul Friedman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2009-08-28 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Elham Kayvanpour; Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani; Weng-Tein Gi; Oguz Firat Tugrul; Ali Amr; Jan Haas; Feng Zhu; Philipp Ehlermann; Lorenz Uhlmann; Hugo A Katus; Benjamin Meder Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Sara Kochańska; Michał Spałek; Grzegorz Wróbel; Wioletta Korzeluch; Ilona Michałowska; Tadeusz Kuder; Beata Wożakowska-Kapłon Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2022-07
Authors: Jaap I van Waning; Kadir Caliskan; Raluca G Chelu; Nikki van der Velde; Andrea Pezzato; Michelle Michels; Marjon A van Slegtenhorst; Eric Boersma; Koen Nieman; Danielle Majoor-Krakauer; Alexander Hirsch Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Rabia S Khan; Elfriede Pahl; Lisa Dellefave-Castillo; Karen Rychlik; Alexander Ing; Kai Lee Yap; Casey Brew; Jamie R Johnston; Elizabeth M McNally; Gregory Webster Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Hannah V Meyer; Timothy J W Dawes; Marta Serrani; Wenjia Bai; Paweł Tokarczuk; Jiashen Cai; Antonio de Marvao; Albert Henry; R Thomas Lumbers; Jakob Gierten; Thomas Thumberger; Joachim Wittbrodt; James S Ware; Daniel Rueckert; Paul M Matthews; Sanjay K Prasad; Maria L Costantino; Stuart A Cook; Ewan Birney; Declan P O'Regan Journal: Nature Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Tyler R Reinoso; Maicon Landim-Vieira; Yun Shi; Jamie R Johnston; P Bryant Chase; Michelle S Parvatiyar; Andrew P Landstrom; Jose R Pinto; Hanna J Tadros Journal: J Muscle Res Cell Motil Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 3.352