Literature DB >> 28797676

Electrogram signature of specific activation patterns: Analysis of atrial tachycardias at high-density endocardial mapping.

Antonio Frontera1, Masateru Takigawa2, Ruairidh Martin3, Nathaniel Thompson3, Ghassen Cheniti3, Grégoire Massoullié3, Josselin Duchateau2, Jean Yves Wielandts3, Elvis Teijeira3, Takeshi Kitamura3, Michael Wolf3, Nora Al-Jefairi3, Konstantinos Vlachos3, Seigo Yamashita3, Sana Amraoui3, Arnaud Denis3, Meleze Hocini2, Hubert Cochet2, Frederic Sacher2, Pierre Jaïs2, Michel Haïssaguerre2, Nicolas Derval3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The significance of fractionated electrograms (EGMs) is object of debate, with multiple mechanisms described.
OBJECTIVE: Using Rhythmia, a high-density mapping system, we sought to investigate the relationship between specific electrophysiological phenomena and EGM characteristics at those sites.
METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients underwent high-density atrial mapping during atrial tachycardias. Bipolar EGMs were recorded with a 64-electrode basket catheter. The following atrial phenomena were identified: slow conduction (SC) areas, lines of block (LB), wavefront collisions (WFC), pivot sites (PS), and gaps. EGMs collected at these predefined areas were analyzed in terms of amplitude, duration, and morphology.
RESULTS: Twenty-five atrial maps with 195 sites of interest (1755 EGMs) were object of our analysis. Thirty-five percent were sites of SC: fractionation had low amplitude (0.16 ± 0.07 mV) and long duration (87.8 ± 10.7 ms); wavefront collisions were seen in 38% of sites with EGMs shorter in duration (46.5 ± 4.5 ms) and higher in voltage (0.58 ± 0.13 mV); 17% were lines of block, never responsible for fractionation (0.13 ± 0.05 mV; 122.4 ms ± 24.8 ms); 9% were PS with a high degree of fractionation (0.55 ± 0.15 mV; 85.8 ± 7.9 ms). Two gaps were identified (1%) with a low degree of fractionation.
CONCLUSION: Specific EGM characteristics in atrial tachycardia can be reproducibly linked to electrophysiological mechanisms. High-voltage and short-duration EGMs are associated with collision sites and PS that are unlikely to form critical sites for ablation; long-duration, low-voltage EGMs are associated with SC. However, not all SC regions will lie within the critical circuit and identification by only EGM characteristics cannot guide ablation.
Copyright © 2017 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial tachycardia; CFAE; Collision; EGM; Fractionation; Fragmentation; Friction; Gaps; High density; Lines of block; Mapping; Pivot sites; Slow conduction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28797676     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  14 in total

1.  Clinical impact of high-density mapping on the acute and long term outcome of atypical atrial flutter ablations.

Authors:  Andrea Di Cori; Lorenzo Mazzocchetti; Matteo Parollo; Mario Giannotti; Antonio Canu; Valentina Barletta; Salvatore Della Volpe; Raffaele De Lucia; Stefano Viani; Luca Segreti; Ezio Soldati; Giulio Zucchelli; Maria Grazia Bongiorni
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Automated conduction velocity estimation based on isochronal activation of heart chambers.

Authors:  Michela Santurri; Jennifer Bonga; Maurizio Schmid; Filippo Maria Cauti; Francesco Solimene; Marco Polselli; Mauro Bura; Francesco Piccolo; Maurizio Malacrida; Gemma Pelargonio; Francesco Raffaele Spera; Stefano Bianchi; Pietro Rossi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Fixed complex electrograms during sinus rhythm and local pacing: potential ablation targets for persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Buyun Xu; Chao Xu; Yong Sun; Jiahao Peng; Fang Peng; Weiliang Tang; Yan Zhou; Shengkai Wang; Jie Pan; Yangbo Xing
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  [High-resolution 3D mapping : Opportunities and limitations of the Rhythmia™ mapping system].

Authors:  Christian Ellermann; Gerrit Frommeyer; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-07-17

5.  High-density versus low-density mapping in ablation of atypical atrial flutter.

Authors:  J C Balt; M N Klaver; B K Mahmoodi; V F van Dijk; M C E F Wijffels; L V A Boersma
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Spatial-Temporal Signals and Clinical Indices in Electrocardiographic Imaging (I): Preprocessing and Bipolar Potentials.

Authors:  Raúl Caulier-Cisterna; Margarita Sanromán-Junquera; Sergio Muñoz-Romero; Manuel Blanco-Velasco; Rebeca Goya-Esteban; Arcadi García-Alberola; José Luis Rojo-Álvarez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Iterative navigation of multipole diagnostic catheters to locate repeating-pattern atrial fibrillation drivers.

Authors:  Prasanth Ganesan; Anthony Salmin; Elizabeth M Cherry; David T Huang; Arkady M Pertsov; Behnaz Ghoraani
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-02-11

8.  Locating Atrial Fibrillation Rotor and Focal Sources Using Iterative Navigation of Multipole Diagnostic Catheters.

Authors:  Prasanth Ganesan; Elizabeth M Cherry; David T Huang; Arkady M Pertsov; Behnaz Ghoraani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.495

9.  An initial experience of high-density mapping-guided ablation in a cohort of patients with adult congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Sabine Ernst; Ilaria Cazzoli; Silvia Guarguagli
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 10.  Atrial Fibrillation Mechanisms and Implications for Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Ghassen Cheniti; Konstantinos Vlachos; Thomas Pambrun; Darren Hooks; Antonio Frontera; Masateru Takigawa; Felix Bourier; Takeshi Kitamura; Anna Lam; Claire Martin; Carole Dumas-Pommier; Stephane Puyo; Xavier Pillois; Josselin Duchateau; Nicolas Klotz; Arnaud Denis; Nicolas Derval; Pierre Jais; Hubert Cochet; Meleze Hocini; Michel Haissaguerre; Frederic Sacher
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.