Literature DB >> 28796397

Clinical evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction for cerebral aneurysms.

Yasutaka Fushimi1, Tomohisa Okada2, Takayuki Kikuchi3, Akira Yamamoto1, Tsutomu Okada1, Takayuki Yamamoto1, Michaela Schmidt4, Kazumichi Yoshida3, Susumu Miyamoto3, Kaori Togashi1.   

Abstract

Compressed sensing (CS) MRI has just been introduced to research areas as an innovative approach to accelerate MRI. CS is expected to achieve higher k-space undersampling by exploiting the underlying sparsity in an appropriate transform domain. MR angiography (MRA) provides high spatial resolution information on arteries; however, a relatively long acquisition time is necessary to cover a wide volume. Reduction of acquisition time by CS for time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (Sparse-TOF) is beneficial in clinical examinations; therefore, the clinical validity of Sparse-TOF needs to be investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic capability of TOF MRA between parallel imaging (PI)-TOF with an acceleration factor of 3 (annotated as 3×) and Sparse-TOF (3× and 5×) in patients with cerebral aneurysms. PI-TOF (3×) and Sparse-TOF (3× and 5×) imaging were performed in 20 patients using a 3 T MRI system. Aneurysms in PI-TOF (3×) and Sparse-TOF (3× and 5×) were blindly rated as visible or scarcely visible by neuroradiologists. The neck, height and width of aneurysms were also measured. Twenty-six aneurysms were visualized and rated as visible in PI-TOF (3×) and Sparse-TOF (3× and 5×), with excellent agreement between two raters. No significant differences were found in measured neck, height or width of aneurysms among them. Sparse-TOF (3× and 5×) were acquired and reconstructed within 6 min, and cerebral aneurysms were visible in both of them with equivalent quality to PI-TOF (3×). Sparse-TOF (5×) is a good alternative to PI-TOF (3×) to visualize cerebral aneurysms.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebral aneurysm; compressed sensing; parallel imaging; time-of-flight MR angiography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28796397     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  8 in total

1.  Highly accelerated time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spiral imaging improves conspicuity of intracranial arterial branches while reducing scan time.

Authors:  Tobias Greve; Nico Sollmann; Andreas Hock; Silke Hey; Velmurugan Gnanaprakasam; Marco Nijenhuis; Claus Zimmer; Jan S Kirschke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Follow-Up Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Endovascular Coiling: Comparison of Compressed Sensing and Parallel Imaging Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

Authors:  Gianfranco Vornetti; Fiorina Bartiromo; Francesco Toni; Massimo Dall'Olio; Mario Cirillo; Peter Speier; Ciro Princiotta; Michaela Schmidt; Caterina Tonon; Domenico Zacà; Raffaele Lodi; Luigi Cirillo
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-06-18

3.  Compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with high spatial resolution for evaluating intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Donghyun Kim; Young Jin Heo; Hae Woong Jeong; Jin Wook Baek; Gi Won Shin; Sung-Chul Jin; Hye Jin Baek; Kyeong Hwa Ryu; Kang Soo Kim; InSeong Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-01-18

4.  Magnetic resonance angiography with compressed sensing: An evaluation of moyamoya disease.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamamoto; Tomohisa Okada; Yasutaka Fushimi; Akira Yamamoto; Koji Fujimoto; Sachi Okuchi; Hikaru Fukutomi; Jun C Takahashi; Takeshi Funaki; Susumu Miyamoto; Aurélien F Stalder; Yutaka Natsuaki; Peter Speier; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Accelerated Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Sparse Undersampling and Iterative Reconstruction for the Evaluation of Intracranial Arteries.

Authors:  Hehan Tang; Na Hu; Yuan Yuan; Chunchao Xia; Xiumin Liu; Panli Zuo; Aurelien F Stalder; Michaela Schmidt; Xiaoyue Zhou; Bin Song; Jiayu Sun
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: An intra-individual comparison study.

Authors:  Thomas Sartoretti; Elisabeth Sartoretti; Árpád Schwenk; Luuk van Smoorenburg; Manoj Mannil; André Euler; Anton S Becker; Alex Alfieri; Arash Najafi; Christoph A Binkert; Michael Wyss; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Vessel wall MR imaging in neuroradiology.

Authors:  Yasutaka Fushimi; Kazumichi Yoshida; Masakazu Okawa; Takakuni Maki; Satoshi Nakajima; Akihiko Sakata; Sachi Okuchi; Takuya Hinoda; Mitsunori Kanagaki; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 6.313

8.  7T versus 3T MR Angiography to Assess Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Eva Leemans; Bart Cornelissen; M L C Sing; Marieke Sprengers; Rene van den Berg; Yvo Roos; W Pieter Vandertop; Cornelius Slump; Henk Marquering; Charles Majoie
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.486

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.