Adjuvant Trastuzumab Therapy for Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in Iran: A Cost-Effectiveness and Scenario Analysis for an Optimal Treatment Strategy.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical guidelines have recommended a 1-year trastuzumab regimen as standard care for early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer; however, this recommendation can have a dramatic impact on total drug expenditures in middle-income countries (MICs). We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from the Iranian healthcare perspective to find an optimum duration of trastuzumab use in Iran.
METHOD: We compared four treatment strategies comprising chemotherapy and varying durations of trastuzumab use (no trastuzumab, 6, 9 months, and 1 year), and a Markov model and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to estimate the costs and effects of the strategies. We then examined the cost effectiveness of the strategies at different willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds and ages at onset of treatment.
RESULTS: Incremental costs (versus no trastuzumab) were €8826 (6 months), €13,808 (9 months) and €18,588 (12 months), while incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were 0.65 (6 months), 0.87 (9 months) and 1.14 (12 months). At a threshold of 3 × gross domestic product (GDP)/capita (€21,000/QALY) and for patients younger than 59 years, the 6-month protocol was most likely to be cost effective (probability of 42%). At a threshold of 4 × GDP/capita (€28,000/QALY), the 6-month and 1-year regimens were essentially equal in cost effectiveness (37 and 35%, respectively). At this WTP threshold, the 6-month and 1-year regimens were optimal strategies only for patients up to 66 and 44 years of age, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In contrast to clinical guidelines, 6 months of trastuzumab may be the most cost-effective option for Iran. The lower absolute WTP threshold and lower life expectancy compared with high-income countries are two crucial parameters in the cost effectiveness of interventions in MICs. It is therefore necessary to strike a balance between maximum population health and maintaining affordability in these countries.

Key Points for Decision Makers

Introduction

Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody that is used in the management of breast cancer (BC). It has mostly been used as adjuvant treatment for patients in the early stage of BC who overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Trastuzumab’s huge share of total drug expenditure, particularly in middle-income countries (MICs), has raised concerns among policymakers regarding efficient resource allocation in their countries [1]. To date, 1 year of trastuzumab use is considered as the optimum duration of therapy for the adjuvant treatment of early-stage, HER2-positive BC [2-4], based on the results of various randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

As an MIC, Iran provided a national guideline that recommends a 9-week period of trastuzumab use [5] due to the unaffordability of 1 year of trastuzumab therapy [1]; however, clinical evidence suggests that very short durations of trastuzumab therapy cannot provide significant efficacy [2]. Therefore, the main question in this regard is “What is the maximum obtainable level of health in an MIC when we are dealing with an expensive intervention?”

The aim of this study was to provide a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of adjuvant trastuzumab for patients with early HER2-positive BC from an Iranian healthcare perspective. Subsequently, we undertake a scenario analysis to determine the optimum duration of trastuzumab use in Iran.

Methods

In our study, we compared two treatment approaches (chemotherapy with and without trastuzumab) for managing early HER2-positive BC. A Markov model was used to estimate the marginal differences in clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. We designed a cohort for patients with HER2-positive BC and included the necessary information in this model to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of using trastuzumab for these patients with a lifetime horizon in Iran. Afterward, a scenario analysis was conducted to compare the cost effectiveness of different strategies of trastuzumab therapy in an MIC.

Model Structure

We designed a model structure based on three sources of information (Fig. 1). First, the routine practice of treating HER2-positive BC in Iran was understood based on a previous study of clinical practice using a claims database and clinician survey [1]. We then discussed our interpretations of the results through a number of interviews with two Iranian academic oncologists, and based on our final decision on data availability. The model was designed to be able to compare two main arms (trastuzumab versus no trastuzumab), and included six main health states: (1) early BC; (2) loco-recurrence BC; (3) advanced BC; (4, 5) two progression-free health states after treatment in early BC and loco-recurrence BC; and (6) death. We also included other health-state subgroups for loco-recurrence (loco-regional and second primary BC), and advanced patients (central nervous system [CNS], visceral, bone, and soft tissue metastasis). Moreover, we incorporated long-term cardiotoxicity in all states in which patients use trastuzumab. A 3-month cycle length was used in the model [1].

Fig. 1

Summary model structure. BC breast cancer, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, CNS central nervous system

In the model, patients with early HER2-positive BC received chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab. After treatment, patients moved to a follow-up state and could progress to local or advanced BC. Patients stayed in the follow-up state until the occurrence of progression (local or distance recurrence) or second primary BC. We assumed that patients in both arms were equally likely to receive all other medical services. Patients who had progressed to loco-recurrence after receiving the treatment could move to the disease-free state after the local-recurrence state, or progress to advanced BC; patients who progressed to advanced BC stayed there until they died from BC or other causes. Some of the patients who received trastuzumab developed reversible cardiac toxicity. Patients in all health states could die due to background mortality.

Patient Characteristics

We set the age at onset of treatment at 45 years, in accordance with the results of a variety of current claims database [6] and epidemiological [7-9] studies in Iran.

Transition Probabilities

The following items describe the input parameters used in the model as well as their sources. Various transition probabilities used in the model are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Transition probabilities

Parameter	Base-case estimate	Distribution	Distribution parameters	Source
Trastuzumab effectiveness
DFS trastuzumab HR (12 m versus 0 m)	0.62	Log-normal	µ = −0.49, σ = 0.13	Moja et al. [2]
DFS trastuzumab HR (6 m versus 12 m)	1.28	Log-normal	µ = 0.23, σ = 0.16	Pivot et al. [3]
DFS trastuzumab HR (9 m versus 12 m)	1.14	Log-normal	µ = 0.13, σ = 0.08	Assumption
Treatment effect duration	48 m	Log-normal	µ = 3.87, σ = 0.307	Hall et al. [10]
Disease progression
Recurrence without trastuzumab
Months 1–48	0.28	Beta	α = 472, β = 1226	Gianni et al. [12]
Months 49–60	0.23	Beta	α = 35, β = 116	Paik et al. [13]
Months 61–120	0.10	Beta	α = 11, β = 94
Beyond 120 months	0	Fixed		Expert opinion
Loco versus distant recurrences
Without trastuzumab	0.355	Beta	α = 100, β = 182	Gianni et al. [12]
With trastuzumab	0.372	Beta	α = 79, β = 133
Distance recurrence pattern
Without trastuzumab
Bone	0.25	Dirichlet	α1 = 38	Piccart-Gebhart et al. [16]
Soft tissue	0.12		α2 = 19
Visceral	0.53		α3 = 82
CNS	0.10		α4 = 15
With trastuzumab
Bone	0.28	Dirichlet	α1 = 24	Piccart-Gebhart et al. [16]
Soft tissue	0.07		α2 = 6
Visceral	0.40		α3 = 34
CNS	0.25		α4 = 21
Second primary or contralateral breast cancer
Years 1–4	0.019	Beta	α = 33, β = 1698	Gianni et al. [12]
Years 5–10	0.026	Beta	α = 10, β = 359	Metzger-Filho et al. [48]
Increased risk of distant metastasis after local recurrence (HR)
Years 1–4	3.22	Log-normal	µ = 1.16, σ = 0.14	Tanis et al. [17]
Years 5–10	6.14	Log-normal	µ = 1.68, σ = 0.52
Cardiac toxicity
Trastuzumab-induced decline in LVEF	0.112	Beta	α = 466, β = 4147	Moja et al. [2]
Trastuzumab-induced CHF	0.025	Beta	α = 135, β = 5471
CHF due to chemotherapies	0.004	Beta	α = 20, β = 4810
Duration of reversible cardiac toxicity	3 months	Fixed		Suter et al. [18]
Time of onset during treatment	3–6 months	Dirichlet	αs = 8, 69, 14, 27
Population background level of CHF among Iranian females	Age-specific	Normal		Talaei et al. [19]
Mortality
Background mortality for Iranian females	Age specific	Fixed		NOfCR[20]
Breast cancer-specific mortality for Iranian females	Age specific	Fixed		Vostakolaei et al. [7]
Mortality from heart failure for Iranian females (1 year, age-adjusted)	0.263	Beta	α = 727, β = 2042	Talaei et al. [19]
Mortality due to metastatic BC
Bone (over 5 years)	0.63	Beta	α = 17, β = 10	Dawood et al. [49]
Soft tissue (over 5 years)	0.77	Beta	α = 12, β = 4
Visceral (over 5 years)	0.78	Beta	α = 28, β = 8
Brain (over 9 months)	0.50	Beta	α = 54, β = 54	Niwinska et al. [50]

CHF congestive heart failure, DFS disease-free survival, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, m months, HR hazard ratio, CNS central nervous system, BC breast cancer

Treatment Effect

The effectiveness of trastuzumab was derived from a Cochrane review [2] that was a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of eight RCTs regarding disease-free survival (DFS) of trastuzumab. Due to our study design, we relied on a DFS hazard ratio (HR) based on the results of the meta-analysis of those trials (five of eight) that investigated the effects of more than 6 months of trastuzumab therapy. To include the treatment effect duration in the model, we used an assumption that was used in a CEA of trastuzumab in the UK [10], based on discussions with experts.

Cancer Progression

For the first 4 years, the recurrence rate in the ‘no trastuzumab’ arm was obtained from the latest HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial [11] report after a 4-year patient follow-up [12]. For years 5–10, the recurrence rates were taken from the anthracycline-treated HER2-positive subgroup of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocol B-15 trial [13]. Since that trial only focused on lymph node-positive patients, we applied a relative risk of 0.815 based on a study reporting that 63% of Iranian patients have node-positive BC at the time of diagnosis [14], and the assumption that node-positive patients have a recurrence rate that is two times greater than node-negative patients [15]. We also assumed no chance of recurrence after 10 years based on expert opinion. The ratio of loco-recurrences to distant recurrences was obtained from the results of the HERA trial [16]. Two HRs were applied to represent the increased risk of distant metastases after local recurrence. These HRs were 3.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02–6.55) and 6.14 (95% CI 2.02–6.55) for years 1–4 and 5–10, respectively [17].

Cardiac Toxicity

The results of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis [2] were used to estimate the probabilities of decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and congestive heart failure (CHF) occurring during 1 year of trastuzumab therapy and other chemotherapy drugs. The time of onset and toxicity duration for patients who had reversible cardiac toxicity were taken from the HERA trial [18]. Moreover, patients suffer from CHF based on an age-specific background, and these probabilities were obtained from a cohort study of 6504 individuals in one province of Iran [19].

Mortality

Age-specific background mortality rates were obtained from online data of the National Organization for Civil Registration (NOCR) [20], which included data on all causes of death in Iran. We used another study of BC mortality rates in three different age ranges [7] to subtract the BC mortality rate from the NOCR data. Data on the age-specific CHF mortality rate in Iran was obtained from an Iranian cohort study [19]. Other parameters regarding BC mortality rates in various metastatic states were extracted from international studies.

Outcomes

Life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated for both arms. Table 2 shows the utility values used in this study. We used the results of a study that provided the utility weights for various health states, based on the EQ-5D questionnaire in Sweden [21]. Another study that used the EQ-5D was selected to find the utility weight for patients who suffer from symptomatic heart failure in the UK [22]. Finally, the utility value (EQ-5D) for patients with brain metastases was obtained from a CEA study in the UK [10].

Table 2

Utilities and costs (year 2017)

Parameter	Mean	Standard error	Distribution	Source
Health utilities
Baseline (disease-free)	0.779	0.017	Beta	Lidgren et al. [21]
Treatment of early stage	0.779	0.017	Beta	Assumption
Symptomatic cardiac toxicity	0.600	0.010	Beta	Calvert et al. [22]
Loco-recurrence	0.780	0.040	Beta	Lidgren et al. [21]
Second primary breast cancer (first year)	0.700	0.032	Beta
Advanced (bone, visceral and soft tissue)	0.690	0.033	Beta
Advanced (brain)	0.600	0.120	Beta	Hall et al. [10]
Costs (€) [€1 = 34,000 rilas]
Treatment
Trastuzumab (first cycle)	6123		Fixed	SSO [51]
Trastuzumab (second, third, and fourth cycles)	5623		Fixed
Early treatment first year	3689	245	Log-normal	Ansaripour et al. [6]
Trastuzumab administration (6 months)a	188	194	Log-normal
Trastuzumab administration (9 months)a	329	359	Log-normal
Trastuzumab administration (1 year)a	471	485	Log-normal
Follow-up annual cost	370	34	Log-normal
Cardiac toxicity
Symptomatic heart failure annual cost	584	140	Log-normal	Ansaripour et al. [6]
Cancer recurrence costs
Second primary breast cancer first year	6024	228	Log-normal	Ansaripour et al. [6]
Second primary breast cancer annual cost	As follow-up annual cost		Log-normal	Assumption
Loco-recurrence first year	3922	177	Log-normal	Ansaripour et al. [6]
Loco-recurrence annual cost	2238	357	Log-normal
Advanced treatment first year	18,151	1394	Log-normal
Advanced treatment annual cost	83,249	2027	Log-normal

a The cost of trastuzumab administration in the first 9 weeks is excluded here due to administration of trastuzumab with other chemotherapy drugs in the same sessions. The cost of trastuzumab administration in the first 9 weeks is included in the cost of early treatment in the first year

Costs

Direct medical costs were calculated from an Iranian healthcare perspective. We assumed 100% coverage for all healthcare services by payers, which helps policymakers to examine the cost effectiveness of complete coverage of all services. We used a recent study that investigated healthcare costs and resource use in both the public and private sectors in Iran, which covers approximately 50% of all Iranians (approximately 40 million) [6]. Due to the variety of health insurance coverage in Iran [23], out-of-pocket payments had already been included in cost calculations [6]; therefore, the costs shown in Table 2 comprise the total costs of medical services. The average patient weight must be known to calculate the cost of trastuzumab; therefore, we used data from a 3-year observational period [1] to estimate the average weight based on the average dose of trastuzumab per patient using trastuzumab. The average dose per patient per prescription was 420 mg (95% CI 415–424; n = 1295), which corresponds with an average weight of 70 kg (69–71). While this may not represent the true average weight of the patients, in reality these real-world data represent the total amounts of trastuzumab, both used and wasted. Patients received trastuzumab in a 3-week cycle until the end of therapy.

The annual national healthcare tariff [24] was used to inflate or adjust the costs attained from years other than the 2014–2017 values.

Analysis

In the absence of a national guideline for economic evaluations in Iran, both costs and effects were discounted by 3.5% per annum, as suggested by the World Health Organization’s Choosing Interventions that are cost-effective (WHO-CHOICE) project [25]. A half-cycle correction was also applied.

The influence of specific input parameters on the ICER of CEA was examined using deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA). The ranges in values were determined based on either the literature or on expert opinion.

A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed in order to quantify the overall uncertainty in the expected output measures [26, 27]. The log-normal distribution was applied for relative risks, HRs, and costs, while the Dirichlet distribution was used for multinomial proportions and the beta distribution was used for binomial proportions and utility weights. The analysis used 10,000 iterations obtained via Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation.

Based on the WHO-CHOICE, the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold in Iran would be 3 × gross domestic product (GDP)/capita, which is equal to €21,000 per QALY (€1 = 34,000 rials) [28]. Because widespread international economic sanctions on Iran began in 2012, we used GDP per capita in 2011, as reported by the World Bank [29], to avoid the effects of these sanctions on Iran’s GDP.

The building of the model, calculations, and statistical analysis were performed using R software for Microsoft Windows, version 3.2.2 (The R Project, Vienna, Austria) [30].

Estimation of the Optimum Duration and Maximum Age Threshold for Trastuzumab Use

Three scenarios of 6, 9 months, and 1 year of trastuzumab use were designed to compare their cost effectiveness. We used the results of the randomized, non-inferiority PHARE trial [3], which compared 6 months versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy, and the results of a Cochrane meta-analysis [2], which compared 1 year of trastuzumab versus no trastuzumab therapy. For 9 months of trastuzumab use, we assumed that the effectiveness HR was half of the non-inferiority HR in the PHARE trial (Table 1). The ICERs of the three strategies were calculated and, eventually, their probability of being cost effective was compared with that of the no trastuzumab arm. Furthermore, due to the importance of patient age, we investigated how the age threshold for treatment can affect the optimal duration of trastuzumab use. Multiple PSAs were performed, with various ages (40–70 years) as the age at onset of treatment, to determine the ‘maximum age threshold’ for the best-case scenario. The ‘maximum age threshold’ represents the maximum age at the onset of treatment that still results in the strategy being optimal, versus other strategies included in the comparison at a particular WTP threshold.

Model Validation

Internal validation was performed to assess how well the model’s results for DFS and overall survival (OS) corresponded with the no trastuzumab and 1-year trastuzumab arms from the HERA trial. Similarly, the results of the PHARE trial were used to validate the model’s results for the 1-year and 6-month trastuzumab strategies.

Results

Over a lifetime horizon, all trastuzumab strategies were cost effective versus no trastuzumab at a WTP of 3 × GDP (Fig. 2). The results of CEA, reported in Table 3, show that at the WTP threshold of 3 × GDP, and a 42% probability, the 6-month protocol was the most cost-effective strategy, while other strategies showed lower rates of being cost effective. The acceptability curves representing the probabilities that various strategies are cost effective across various WTP thresholds in the base-case scenario can be found in Fig. 3. The 1-year trastuzumab strategy was cost effective in only 21% of simulations, and the 9-month and no trastuzumab strategies were cost effective in 21 and 17% of cases, respectively. When the WTP threshold was increased to 4 × GDP, the 6-month and 1-year regimens were essentially equal in cost effectiveness (37 and 35%, respectively). The 9-month regimen had a 20% probability of cost effectiveness. However, the chance of the no trastuzumab strategy being cost effective fell to 8% when a WTP threshold of 4 × GDP was applied.

Fig. 2

Cost-effectiveness plan for trastuzumab use scenarios versus no trastuzumab (a sample of 7000 results of PSA for every strategy). The ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals. GDP gross domestic product, QALYs quality-adjusted life-years, PSA probabilistic sensitivity analysis

Table 3

Results of the cost-effectiveness analysis

Strategies	Cost (€)	QALYs	LYs	ICER (QALY)	ICER (LY)
No trastuzumab	14,541	11.1	14.41	NA	NA
6 months of trastuzumab	22,442	11.71	15.18	14,625	11,664
	Δ = 8901	Δ = 0.61	Δ = 0.76
9 months of trastuzumab	28,410	11.95	15.48	16,370	13,037
	Δ = 13,869	Δ = 0.85	Δ = 1.06
1 year of trastuzumab	33,160	12.22	15.82	16,695	13,279
	Δ = 18,619	Δ = 1.12	Δ = 1.40

Δ = incremental values for costs and effectiveness of trastuzumab therapy strategists versus no trastuzumab

QALYs quality-adjusted life-years, LYs life-years, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, NA not applicable

Fig. 3

Acceptability curves of the base-case scenario. GDP gross domestic product

The base-case and DSA of the model yields ICERs for 6, 9 months and 1 year of €15,108, €16,800, and €17,086 per QALY versus no trastuzumab, respectively. Subsequently, deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis (summarized in Table 4) revealed that the key drivers were the acquisition cost and clinical effectiveness of 1 year of trastuzumab use versus no trastuzumab. Additionally, probabilistic one-way sensitivity analysis showed that when the cost of trastuzumab was changed from −30 to +30% in the base-case, the probability of the 1-year regimen being cost effective decreased from 41 to 8% (Online Resource 1). However, 6 months of trastuzumab therapy showed less of a change (9; 34–43%) at a threshold of 3 × GDP. In contrast, changes in the HR of DFS for 6 months of trastuzumab use versus no trastuzumab showed a range of 16% (54–38%) in the lower (0.50) and upper (0.74) limits (Online Resource 2). At a threshold of 3 × GDP, the 6-month regimen was the most cost-effective strategy (54%) for the lower limit of HR, and the no trastuzumab strategy was the cost-effective strategy for the upper limit of HR. Finally, our results (Fig. 4) show that the 6-month strategy is only cost effective when treated patients are not older than 59 years (the maximum age threshold). At this age, and at a WTP threshold of 3 × GDP, the two strategies of 6 months of trastuzumab and no trastuzumab had almost equal chances of being cost effective (39.5 versus 40%, respectively). However, this age threshold can change if the WTP is increased or decreased. At the WTP threshold of 4 × GDP, 1 year of trastuzumab use is only cost effective for patients who are younger than 44 years, and 6 months of trastuzumab use may be the best strategy for patients between 44 and 66 years of age (Online Resource 3). Finally, the impact of various ages (40–70 years) on the cost effectiveness of different strategies are shown in Online Resource 4.

Table 4

Results of one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis; the impact of the top seven key drivers on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

Base-case	Limits	Value	Reference			Strategies
			No trastuzumab			6-month trastuzumab		9-month trastuzumab		1-year trastuzumab
			Cost changes	QALY changes	LY changes	Cost/QALYs changes	Cost/LY changes	Cost/QALYs changes	Cost/LY changes	Cost/QALYs changes	Cost/LY changes
Base-case	Mean		14,541	11.1	14.4	14,625	11,664	16,370	13,037	16,695	13,279
Cost of trastuzumab	Lower	−30%				9135	7285	10,542	8395	10,884	8658
						−38%	−38%	−36%	−36%	−35%	−35%
	Upper	+30%				20,116	16,043	22,198	17,678	22,505	17,901
						38%	38%	36%	36%	35%	35%
Effectiveness of trastuzumab Disease-free survival HR12 m versus 0 m	Lower	0.50				7496	5974	10,338	8232	12,079	9610
						−49%	−49%	−37%	−37%	−28%	−28%
	Upper	0.74				62,873	50,398	33,618	26,778	25,740	20,464
						330%	332%	105%	105%	54%	54%
Effectiveness of trastuzumab Disease-free survival HR12 m versus 6 m	Lower	1.20				11,377	9070
						−22%	−22%
	Upper	1.36				19,924	15,899
						36%	36%
Effectiveness of trastuzumabDisease-free survival HR12 versus 9 m	Lower	1.09						14,526	11,568
								−11%	−11%
	Upper	1.18						18,164	14,465
								11%	11%
Age at start	Lower	40	14,688	11.7	15.2	13,352	10,630	14,994	11,921	15,322	12,169
			1%	6%	6%	−9%	−9%	−8%	−9%	−8%	−8%
	Upper	50	14,336	10.4	13.5	16,425	13,130	18,307	14,611	18,619	14,840
			−1%	−7%	−7%	12%	13%	12%	12%	11%	12%
Discount rate for costs	Lower	0%	17,612			13,497	10,764	15,485	12,332	15,963	12,698
			21%			−8%	−8%	−5%	−5%	−4%	−4%
	Upper	7%	12,624			15,317	12,216	16,932	13,484	17,174	13,660
			−13%			5%	5%	3%	3%	3%	3%
Discount rate for effectiveness	Lower	0%		18.4	23.9	7335	5791	8283	6534	8499	6699
				66%	66%	−50%	−50%	−49%	−50%	−49%	−50%
	Upper	7%		7.8	10.1	25,341	20,431	28,088	22,599	28,455	22,854
				−30%	−30%	73%	75%	72%	73%	70%	72%

Blank spaces indicate no effects on the results of the base-case scenario

LY life-years, M month, QALYs quality-adjusted life-years, HR hazard ratio

Fig. 4

The impact of life expectancy on the probabilities of being cost effective among different treatment strategies. Max age threshold represents the maximum patient age at onset of treatment that, for those patients, strategy remains optimal at a particular WTP threshold, WTP willingness-to-pay, GDP gross domestic product

Figure 5 illustrates the effect of price reductions on the maximum age threshold. Our analyses revealed that trastuzumab is only cost effective if the price was to be reduced by 30%; however, this reduction would make 1 year of trastuzumab use the optimal strategy only if it was given to patients younger than 49.5 years of age. As Fig. 5 shows, a 10% reduction in price increases the maximum age threshold by 3 and 6 years for the 6-month and 1-year treatment regimens, respectively.

Fig. 5

The impact of price reduction on max-age threshold at WTP 3×GDP in Iran. WTP willingness-to-pay, GDP gross domestic product, max-age maximum age

The internal validation results for the three strategies, including no trastuzumab and 1 year and 6 months of trastuzumab use revealed no significant differences between the results of the model and the results of the trials used to perform this study (Table 5).

Table 5

Results of the internal validation

	No trastuzumab  (HERA trial versus model)	6 months of trastuzumab  (PHARE trial versus model)	1 year of trastuzumab  (HERA trial versus model)
Overall survival	p = 0.489	p = 0.388	p = 0.424
Disease-free survival	p = 0.395	p = 0.319	p = 0.267

Discussion

The use of monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab is a hotly debated topic among policymakers, patients, and healthcare professionals in MICs due to their considerable impact on the healthcare budgets of these nations. For example, in Iran, trastuzumab alone accounts for approximately €93–140 million (approximately 4–6%) of total pharmaceutical expenditure [1]. Trastuzumab is an effective but very expensive drug for patients with HER2-positive BC; therefore, policymakers in MICs can neither ignore it because of its effectiveness nor reimburse it with the same duration, as clinical guidelines have recommended in high-income countries (HICs), due to its cost. Specifically, more money spent on trastuzumab means less money for other treatments [31]. The questions that healthcare professionals and policymakers in these countries must answer include: “What is the optimum duration of trastuzumab use to provide an efficient and affordable treatment?” and “How can we balance population health and affordability?” In response to these questions, our study provides valuable information regarding the cost effectiveness of various trastuzumab strategies in Iran, which may also be useful for other MICs. Moreover, to our knowledge this is the first CEA that examines age heterogeneity of patients and explores the impact of life expectancy on the cost effectiveness of various trastuzumab strategies in an MIC.

The effectiveness of shorter durations of trastuzumab therapy has been studied in various RCTs. The FinHER (Finland Herceptin) trial [32] investigated clinical outcomes in 9 weeks of trastuzumab use and reported an HR of 0.42 (95% CI 0.21–0.83, p = 0.01) for the DFS of trastuzumab use versus no trastuzumab. However, this study was faced with some limitations, such as small sample size, and the results of other trials (SOLD [33] and SHORT-HER [34]) that also focused on 9-week trastuzumab use have not yet published. As a result, we therefore excluded the 9-week strategy as a comparator in this study. The clinical outcomes of 6 months of trastuzumab use were the subject of two RCTs (PHARE [3] and PERSEPHONE [35]). Since only the results of PHARE are currently available, we used the PHARE results in this study. Our assumption regarding the DFS HR in the 9-month strategy was not supported by a real RCT. It was therefore necessary to make assumptions to investigate a potentially cost-effective strategy between 6 months and 1 year of trastuzumab use. Finally, the model was internally validated based on the results of the aforementioned RCTs.

A previously published CEA reported that 1 year of trastuzumab use is not cost effective in Iran [36]; however, this study had some methodological inconsistencies when assessed using the Drummond economic evaluation checklist [37] and also used an inappropriate trastuzumab cost. The cost of 1 year of trastuzumab use by a 70-kg woman was estimated at $48,850, which is inconsistent with the public price of trastuzumab dosage forms (€500 and €1294 for 150 and 440 mg vials, respectively [€22,992] [38]). Consequently, it was necessary to conduct a new study using appropriate methods and more reliable input parameters. For this purpose, we attempted to design a standard economic evaluation using country-specific information, such as the results of a real-world cost analysis that exclusively investigated HER2-positive direct medical costs in Iran [6].

Our results show that the most cost-effective strategy in the treatment of early HER2-positive BC in Iran is 6 months of trastuzumab as an adjuvant therapy. This strategy remains optimal, even if the price of trastuzumab is reduced by almost 30% (Online Resource 1). The 1-year strategy is only cost effective at higher WTP thresholds. Since, the 9-month strategy was dominated by the 6-month and 1-year strategies, from an efficiency perspective, the 6-month and 1-year strategies are the two best strategies. If the 6-month protocol is considered the standard of care, and doctors continue to adhere to this strategy, Iran can save €40 million/year compared with a 1-year trastuzumab strategy. It is worth noting that all these results can vary if the age of patients at the onset of treatment is changed, and that these various strategies for trastuzumab use would not be cost effective in patients older than 59 years of age (Fig. 4). In other words, in addition to a lower absolute WTP threshold for expensive drugs in MICs, life expectancy in these countries (e.g. 76.6 years for Iranian women) is also generally lower than in HICs. These two issues can affect the results of a CEA in MICs.

We compared our results with the results of model-based CEAs [10, 39–42] in other countries that used the same study perspective (healthcare), time horizon (lifetime), and trastuzumab use duration (1 year). Two studies (in China [39] and Belgium [42]) calculated ICER values that were lower than those in our study ($8041 and €10,315, respectively), while four CEAs (in the US [40, 41], Australia [43], and the UK [10]) estimated higher ICERs ($39,982, $26,417, $A22,793, and £25,803, respectively). Regardless of this variation, in all studies, including our study, ICERs were primarily affected by the cost of trastuzumab. Despite the methodological similarities between this study and other studies, we cannot easily compare our results with other CEAs because of differences in various parameters, such as costs of trastuzumab, prices for healthcare services, discount rates, background mortality rates, and sources of estimation of the effectiveness of trastuzumab. On the other hand, a CEA in Colombia, using a shorter time horizon (20 years), concluded that trastuzumab is not cost effective, even though trastuzumab was cheaper (US$4,219 versus €22,992) and advanced-stage treatment (downstream costs) was more costly (US$52,093 versus €16,926) compared with costs in Iran [44]. However, comparisons between that study and our study are difficult, not only because of differences in time horizon and cost components but also because of differences in the sources of clinical effectiveness and utility values that were used. This means that comparisons between CEAs of trastuzumab, and between MICs, are also prone to the same problems that arise when comparisons between CEAs in HICs are performed.

Our study faced four notable limitations. First, we had to use the results of studies performed in HICs due to the lack of country-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In fact, there are no good-quality publications on HRQoL in Iran. However, this limitation has no major impact on the overall results since our one-way sensitivity analysis showed ±30% changes in utility values caused less than ±8% changes in the estimated ICER. Second, the HERA trial has recently reported 11 years of median follow-up, and data from this trial could have been used to update the parameter estimates in our model [45]. However, the updated estimate of effectiveness of trastuzumab after 11 years was lower than the effectiveness after 2 years (i.e. an increase in the HR for DFS from 0.62 to 0.73). However, the results of one-way sensitivity analysis (Online Resource 2) that any reduced effectiveness of trastuzumab would not change the conclusion that the price of trastuzumab must be reduced significantly in order for it to have any chance of being cost effective, even for a subgroup of the patient population (i.e. younger patients). Third, the cost effectiveness of the 9-month strategy was estimated based on an assumption of effectiveness due to a lack of data. Despite its low impact on the overall results, as demonstrated by sensitivity analysis (Table 4), our CEA can be updated when the results of the SOLD [33] and/or SHORT-HER [34] trials become available. Finally, while it is known that women with hormone receptor-negative tumors have an increased risk of recurrence and death, we did not examine the cost effectiveness of treatment decisions based on hormone receptor status [46]. This is something that should be examined in the future.

New drugs launched in MICs do not necessarily have the same effectiveness or affordability as in HICs. Policymakers and other primary stakeholders, such as healthcare professionals and patient communities, should focus on a strategy that will help to create a balance between the highest attainable level of health and affordability of the new drug. However, if there is a desire to implement widely accepted clinical guidelines in MICs, concessions are unavoidable. There are four approaches that would lead to recommending 1 year of trastuzumab use in Iran: (1) price reduction; (2) use of a higher WTP threshold; (3) a combination of these two methods; and (4) ‘watchful waiting’ for a generic product. Our results showed that the first two options, either price reduction (by −30%) [Fig. 3] or the use of a higher WTP threshold (4 × GDP), cannot achieve a new balancing point between population health and affordability to switch to a longer course of trastuzumab therapy (Online Resource 3). The third option could be a potential solution; however, due to changes in the price of trastuzumab and the WTP threshold, the maximum age threshold for 1 year of trastuzumab use should be re-estimated. Moreover, the use of a higher WTP would set a precedent for other treatments. The ‘watchful waiting’ approach can indeed enhance affordability in MICs; however, this would mean waiting many years before drugs such as trastuzumab would be reimbursed in MICs. In many cases, ‘watchful waiting’ would mean a large amount of health loss. Therefore, a more equitable solution would involve revamping pharmaceutical pricing systems to make new drugs more affordable for lower income countries. For example, a 75% price reduction would be needed to make 1 year of trastuzumab, the strategy recommended in clinical guidelines in HICs, cost effective for all patients younger than 76.6 years (the average life expectancy) in Iran (Fig. 5).

Effectiveness and affordability are not the only two factors to consider when policymakers make reimbursement decisions. Other factors, such as budget impact and equity analysis, are also important to consider. In fact, using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) that includes various factors is likely the best way to help policymakers reach a satisfactory conclusion [47].

Conclusions

Most clinical guidelines prepared in HICs have recommended 1 year of trastuzumab use due to the efficacy of the drug; however, this treatment strategy would not be an affordable recommendation in MICs due to the lower absolute value of the WTP threshold and the lower life expectancy compared with HICs. Our study showed that 6 months of trastuzumab use is the most cost effective option for the Iranian healthcare setting at a WTP threshold of 3 × GDP and a maximum age threshold of 59 years. Policymakers and other stakeholders in MICs must find the best way to balance population health and affordability of an expensive intervention.

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Resource 1 Acceptability curves at the lower and upper limits of cost of trastuzumab as the results of one-way sensitivity analysis. (TIFF 280 kb)

Online Resource 2 Acceptability curves at the lower and upper limits of effectiveness of tra**stuzumab as the results of one-way sensitivity analysis.DFS HR: Disease-free survival hazard ratio. (TIFF 292 kb)

Online Resource 3 The impact of WTP thresholds and life expectancy on the probabilities being cost effective among different treatment strategies at two WTP thresholds of 2×GDP and 4×GDP. (TIFF 224 kb)

Online Resource 4 Acceptability curves of various patient age at the onset of treatment as the results of one-way sensitivity analysis (TIFF 2813 kb)

Lower absolute willingness-to-pay and life expectancy are two important issues that can affect conclusions regarding the cost effectiveness of treatment in middle-income countries

Although most clinical guidelines worldwide recommend 1 year of trastuzumab for early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, it is not the most cost-effective strategy in Iran.

In Iran, the most cost-effective strategy is 6 months of trastuzumab, but only for patients younger than 59 years of age.

A significant price reduction is necessary to make trastuzumab cost effective for all patients.