INTRODUCTION: Locoregional recurrence (LRR) after breast-conserving therapy is a well-known independent risk factor associated with unfavourable long-term outcome. Controversy exists concerning the prognostic impact of a LRR after a very long event-free interval. METHOD: Patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer were pooled from four European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast Group trials. Only LRR as a first event was taken into account. Risk factors such as tumour size, nodal status, young age and chemotherapy were assessed in multivariate Cox regression analysis. LRR was used as a time-dependent variable in the landmark analysis for distant disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were categorised as having at least 0, 5 or 10 years event-free survival. RESULTS: In total, 7751 early stage breast cancer patients were included with a median follow-up of 10.9 years. Tumour size, nodal status, young age and chemotherapy are strong independent prognostic factors with a significant impact on long-term outcome, but lose their power and significance over time. Including all patients, LRR was the strongest prognostic factor for OS and distant DFS (resp. HR 5.01 and HR 5.31, p<0.001). In the subgroup of patients developing a LRR after at least 5 or 10 years, LRR remained the strongest independent prognostic factor for OS (resp. HR 3.98, HR 4.96, p ≤ 0.001) and distant DFS (HR 4.42, HR 7.57 p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first study which shows LRR after breast-conserving therapy is a very strong, time-independent prognostic factor for long term outcome in early stage breast cancer patients. These findings suggest that a LRR after a long event-free interval seems to be an indicator rather than an instigator of subsequent distant disease.
INTRODUCTION: Locoregional recurrence (LRR) after breast-conserving therapy is a well-known independent risk factor associated with unfavourable long-term outcome. Controversy exists concerning the prognostic impact of a LRR after a very long event-free interval. METHOD:Patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer were pooled from four European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast Group trials. Only LRR as a first event was taken into account. Risk factors such as tumour size, nodal status, young age and chemotherapy were assessed in multivariate Cox regression analysis. LRR was used as a time-dependent variable in the landmark analysis for distant disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were categorised as having at least 0, 5 or 10 years event-free survival. RESULTS: In total, 7751 early stage breast cancerpatients were included with a median follow-up of 10.9 years. Tumour size, nodal status, young age and chemotherapy are strong independent prognostic factors with a significant impact on long-term outcome, but lose their power and significance over time. Including all patients, LRR was the strongest prognostic factor for OS and distant DFS (resp. HR 5.01 and HR 5.31, p<0.001). In the subgroup of patients developing a LRR after at least 5 or 10 years, LRR remained the strongest independent prognostic factor for OS (resp. HR 3.98, HR 4.96, p ≤ 0.001) and distant DFS (HR 4.42, HR 7.57 p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first study which shows LRR after breast-conserving therapy is a very strong, time-independent prognostic factor for long term outcome in early stage breast cancerpatients. These findings suggest that a LRR after a long event-free interval seems to be an indicator rather than an instigator of subsequent distant disease.
Authors: Irene L Wapnir; Shari Gelber; Stewart J Anderson; Eleftherios P Mamounas; André Robidoux; Miguel Martín; Johan W R Nortier; Charles E Geyer; Alexander H G Paterson; István Láng; Karen N Price; Alan S Coates; Richard D Gelber; Priya Rastogi; Meredith M Regan; Norman Wolmark; Stefan Aebi Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Annemieke Witteveen; Annemiek B G Kwast; Gabe S Sonke; Maarten J IJzerman; Sabine Siesling Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: F Fitzal; M Filipits; M Rudas; R Greil; O Dietze; H Samonigg; S Lax; W Herz; P Dubsky; R Bartsch; R Kronenwett; M Gnant Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jennifer C Melvin; Arnie D Purushotham; Hans Garmo; Sarah E Pinder; Ian S Fentiman; Cheryl Gillett; Anca Mera; Margreet Lüchtenborg; Lars Holmberg; Mieke Van Hemelrijck Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jun Hee Lee; Se Kyung Lee; Sung Min Park; Jae Min Ryu; Hyun June Paik; Ha Woo Yi; Soo Youn Bae; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Won Kim; Seok Jin Nam Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 3.588