Literature DB >> 28795086

Data from a survey of Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile shedding by dogs and cats in the Madrid region (Spain), including phenotypic and genetic characteristics of recovered isolates.

Sergio Álvarez-Pérez1, José L Blanco1, Celine Harmanus2, Ed J Kuijper2, Marta E García1.   

Abstract

This article contains information related to a recent survey of the prevalence of fecal shedding of Clostridium perfringens and C. difficile by dogs and cats attended in veterinary clinics located in the Madrid region (Spain). Specifically, we provide detailed information about the clinics that participated in the survey, the demographic and clinic characteristics of recruited animals and the genetic and phenotypic characteristics (including antimicrobial susceptibility data), of recovered bacterial isolates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial resistance; Cat; Clostridium difficile; Clostridium perfringens; Dog; Genetic diversity

Year:  2017        PMID: 28795086      PMCID: PMC5537374          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data First detailed analysis of the prevalence of Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile shedding by small animals (dogs and cats) in the Madrid region (Spain). Detailed phenotypic and genetic data of recovered isolates is provided, which may be useful for comparison in future epidemiological surveys. Given the recent emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains of C. difficle, information on the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the isolates obtained in this survey may be particularly valuable.

Data

The data shown in Section 1.1 of this article provide detailed information on the veterinary clinics that participated in a recent survey of the prevalence of fecal shedding of Clostridium perfringens and C. difficile by dogs and cats which was carried out in the Madrid region (Spain) [1]. Furthermore, the demographic and clinical features of recruited animals are detailed in Section 1.2, and Section 1.3 provides extensive data on the genetic and phenotypic characteristics of recovered bacterial isolates.

General data about participating clinics

An overview of the 17 veterinary clinics that participated in the study (hereafter referred to as clinics A to Q) is provided in Table 1. Two clinics (L and P) did not return a questionnaire of general data about their centre (see Section 2) and in two other cases (clinics H and K) the returned questionnaire was incomplete. Participating clinics were scattered within the Madrid region (14 were located in the capital city, two in other municipalities within the metropolitan area and one in a rural location) and varied widely in their year of opening (from 1981 to 2014), number of cases attended per week (x±S.D.=37.6±18.7 and 16.5±11 for dogs and cats, respectively), number of fecal cultures requested per week (1.6±2.4 and 0.9±1.8), and other parameters (Table 1). These clinics also differed in the antibiotics used for the treatment of diarrhea, but 12 of them (80% for which pharmacological data were available) reported the use of metronidazole for the treatment of these conditions. Only three clinics (20%; F, J and O) acknowledged frequent request of microbiological culturing for anaerobes, and five clinics (33.3%; D, F, H, N and O) reported occasional suspicion of C. difficile and/or C. perfringens involvement in severe cases of diarrhea.
Table 1

Overview of the characteristics of the veterinary clinics that participated in the study.a

ClinicOpening yearNo. cases per weekbNo. diarrea cases per weekbNo. fecal samples per weekbNo. fecal cultures per weekb
A201461 (55 D, 6 C)2.5 (2 D, 0.5 C)1 (1 D)0.5 (0.5 D)
B199482 (50 D, 32 C)2.5 (2 D, 0.5 C)3.5 (3 D, 0.5 C)0
C200911 (10 D, 1 C)5.5 (5 D, 0.5 C)1 (1 D)0
D201440 (22 D, 18 C)8 (7 D, 1 C)7 (5 D, 2 C)0
E199340 (20 D, 20 C)2 (2 D)4 (2 D, 2 C)4 (2 D, 2 C)
F1981100 (70 D, 30 C)14 (10 D, 4 C)2.3 (2 D, 0.3 C)0.31 (0.3 D, 0.01 C)
G198427.5 (16 D, 11.5 C)11.5 (8 D, 3.5 C)1.5 (1 D, 0.5 C)1.5 (1 D, 0.5 C)
H200255 (35 D, 20 C)5 (4 D, 1 C)NANA
I199270 (60 D, 10 C)8 (7 D, 1 C)1.5 (1 D, 0.5 C)0
J200490 (48 D, 42 C)12 (8 D, 4 C)16 (10 D, 6 C)14 (8 D, 6 C)
K1985NANA10 (6 D, 4 C)10 (6 D, 4 C)
LNANANANANA
M200147.5 (35 D, 12.5 C)4.5 (4 D, 0.5 C)4.5 (4 D, 0.5 C)3 (2.5 D, 0.5 C)
N199935 (25 D, 10 C)4 (3 D, 1 C)4 (3 D, 1 C)1 (1 D)
O201026 (20 D, 6 C)3 (2.5 D, 0.5 C)0.5 (0.5 D)0.5 (0.5 D)
PNANANANANA
Q200572 (60 D, 12 C)20 (20 D)2 (2 D)0
Totalc54.1±25.3 (37.6±18.7 D, 16.5±11 C)7.3±5.1 (6±4.6 D, 1.3±1.4 C)4.2±4.1 (3±2.5 D, 1.2±1.7 C)2.5±4.1 (1.6±2.4 D, 0.9±1.8 C)

See also Fig. 1.

D, dogs; C, cats. All figures refer to the last 12-month period.

x±S.D.

Overview of the characteristics of the veterinary clinics that participated in the study.a See also Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Characteristics of the animal populations recruited for this study. A) Bar plot showing the distribution of recruited animals per species: dog, green bars; cats, orange bars. For each participating clinic (A to Q), the overall number of animals is indicated between parentheses. B) Bar plot of the overall age distribution of dogs (n=105; green bars) and cats (n=37; orange bars) recruited for the study. C) Pie charts of the overall sex distribution of dogs (n=105) and cats (n=37) included in the study. Blue and pink sectors represent male (M) and female (F) subpopulations, respectively. D) Bar plot of the antimicrobial treatments administered to recruited dogs and cats (green and orange bars, respectively) ≤30 days before sampling. E) Bar plot of recent pharmacological treatments administered to recruited dogs and cats (green and orange bars, respectively) ≤30 days before sampling. Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin-converting-enzyme; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PPIs, proton pump inhibitors. In panels D and E, pharmacological treatment data were not available for a total of 48 animals (32 dogs and 16 cats).

D, dogs; C, cats. All figures refer to the last 12-month period. x±S.D.

Demographic and clinical features of recruited animals

The demographic characteristics of recruited animals are summarized in Table 2 and Fig. 1, Fig. 2. A total of 142 animals, including 105 dogs and 37 cats (73.9% and 26.1% of total, respectively; Fig. 1A) of diverse breeds (Fig. 2), were recruited for the study. The male/female ratio of animals varied widely among clinics, with the overall values for dogs and cats being similar (56.2%, 43.8% and 56.8%, 43.2%, respectively; Fig. 1C). The age distribution of sampled animals also showed ample variation among clinics, but the overall values were similar for the dog and cat subpopulations: 20%, 45.7%, 32.4% of dogs and 10.8%, 54.1%, 32.4% of cats had <1 year, 1–6 years and ≥7 years, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Overview of the animals that were recruited for this studya.

ClinicNbDogs
Cats
nSex ratiocAge distribution
Days since last episode of diarrhea
nSex ratiocAge distribution
Days since last episode of diarrhea
<1 yr1–6 yr≥7 yr0≤30>30<1 yr1–6 yr≥7 yr0≤30>30
A662:133.3%66.7%0%0%66.7%33.3%0
B15121:525%25%50%25%0%75%32:10%33.3%66.7%0%0%100%
C843:150%50%0%0%25%75%41:10%25%75%50%0%50%
D321:10%100%0%0%0%100%10:10%0%100%0%0%100%
E432:10%66.7%33.3%0%66.7%33.3%10:10%0%100%100%0%0%
F1252:30%20%80%0%40%60%74:314.3%85.7%0%0%0%100%
G171511:420%40%40%13.3%26.7%60%20:10%100%0%0%0%100%
H554:1100%0%0%20%20%60%0
I654:120%60%20%40%20%40%11:00%0%100%0%100%0%
J*832:10%66.7%0%33.3%66.7%0%53:220%60%0%40%60%0%
K221:00%50%50%0%0%100%0
L*220:10%0%50%50%0%50%0
M27224:74.5%59.1%36.4%0%13.6%86.4%53:220%60%20%0%0%100%
N*987:112.5%37.5%50%12.5%0%37.5%11:00%0%100%0%0%100%
O1141:125%75%0%0%25%75%75:214.3%57.1%28.6%0%0%100%
P110:1100%0%0%100%0%0%0
Q665:116.7%50%33.3%33.3%33.3%33.3%0
Total*14210559:4620%45.7%32.4%13.3%21.9%61%3721:1610.8%54.1%32.4%13.5%10.8%75.7%

See also Fig. 1. Asterisks indicate that there were some recruited animals with missing data and thus the sum of percentages can be <100%.

Total number of animals that were recruited (i.e. dogs and cats).

Number of males: number of females.

Fig. 2

Bar plots showing the breed distribution of recruited dogs (n=105, left panel) and cats (n=37, right panel). *Other dog breeds (n): Boxer (3), Setter (3), Shih Tzu (3), American Staffordshire Terrier (2), Belgian Shepherd (2), Border Collie (2), Chinese Shar-Pei (2), Cocker Spaniel (2), Golden Retriever (2), Labrador Retriever (2), Pug (2), Shiba Inu (2), Andalusian Hound (1), Chihuahua (1), Dalmatian (1), Galician Palleiro (1), Hound (1), Mastiff (1), Miniature Pinscher (1), Pit bull (1), Poodle (1), Water dog (1).

Characteristics of the animal populations recruited for this study. A) Bar plot showing the distribution of recruited animals per species: dog, green bars; cats, orange bars. For each participating clinic (A to Q), the overall number of animals is indicated between parentheses. B) Bar plot of the overall age distribution of dogs (n=105; green bars) and cats (n=37; orange bars) recruited for the study. C) Pie charts of the overall sex distribution of dogs (n=105) and cats (n=37) included in the study. Blue and pink sectors represent male (M) and female (F) subpopulations, respectively. D) Bar plot of the antimicrobial treatments administered to recruited dogs and cats (green and orange bars, respectively) ≤30 days before sampling. E) Bar plot of recent pharmacological treatments administered to recruited dogs and cats (green and orange bars, respectively) ≤30 days before sampling. Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin-converting-enzyme; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PPIs, proton pump inhibitors. In panels D and E, pharmacological treatment data were not available for a total of 48 animals (32 dogs and 16 cats). Bar plots showing the breed distribution of recruited dogs (n=105, left panel) and cats (n=37, right panel). *Other dog breeds (n): Boxer (3), Setter (3), Shih Tzu (3), American Staffordshire Terrier (2), Belgian Shepherd (2), Border Collie (2), Chinese Shar-Pei (2), Cocker Spaniel (2), Golden Retriever (2), Labrador Retriever (2), Pug (2), Shiba Inu (2), Andalusian Hound (1), Chihuahua (1), Dalmatian (1), Galician Palleiro (1), Hound (1), Mastiff (1), Miniature Pinscher (1), Pit bull (1), Poodle (1), Water dog (1). Overview of the animals that were recruited for this studya. See also Fig. 1. Asterisks indicate that there were some recruited animals with missing data and thus the sum of percentages can be <100%. Total number of animals that were recruited (i.e. dogs and cats). Number of males: number of females. The overall proportion of dogs and cats with diarrhea on the sampling date were very similar (13.3% and 13.5%, respectively), and in both cases most animals had not suffered any episode of diarrhea within the preceding 30 days (61% and 75.7%, respectively) (Table 2). Only 24.7% (18/73) of dogs and 14.3% (3/21) of cats for which medication data was available were under antibiotic treatment on the sampling date or within the previous 30 days, with metronidazole and amoxicillin ranking first and second, respectively (Fig. 1D). Other pharmacological treatments of sampled animals are shown in Fig. 1E. The demographic data and clinical features of animals yielding positive fecal cultures for C. perfringens and/or C. difficile are detailed in Table 3 (see also Álvarez-Pérez et al. [1]).
Table 3

Signalment and clinical data of animals yielding positive fecal cultures for Clostridium perfringens and/or C. difficile, and characteristics of recovered isolates.

ClinicAnimalaSpecies, breedbAge (yr.)bSexDiagnosisOther medical conditions of relevanceDiarrhoeacAntibiotic treatment(s)dGenotype (antimicrobial resistances) ofC. perfringensisolateseGenotype (antimicrobial resistances) ofC. difficileisolatesf
AA/02Dog, Mixed-breed5FRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep063, p064, p065
BB/02Dog, Whippet13FRoutine analysisLymphomaNoNonep067
B/06Dog, Whippet7FRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep027, p028 [2 isolates]
B/07Dog, Schnauzer9FRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep011, p012, p023
B/08Dog, Schnauzer9FRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep002, p047, p051RT154/d05 (PEN), RT154/d06 (PEN), RT154/d07 (PEN)
B/11Dog, Mixed Setter<1FRecent history of Isospora infectionNoneYesMetronidazolep035, p036 [2 isolates]
B/12Dog, Mixed Miniature Pinscher6FRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep037
B/13Cat, European shorthair9FRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep003 (MTZ), p006, p031
B/14Cat, European shorthair1MRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep069, p072
DD/02Dog, Hound1FRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep087 (MTZ), p088 (LZD), p095
EE/03Dog, Yorkshire Terrier11MGastroenteritis with vomitingHeart failureYes (5 d)Amoxicillin-clavulanic acidNART?/d13 (CLI/ERY/PEN) [2 isolates], RT?/d14 (CLI/ERY/PEN)
FF/09Cat, Persian6MRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep004, p005
GG/01Dog, Labrador12MRoutine analysisNoneYes (7 d)Doxycyclinep106
Follow-up analysisNoneNoNonep041, p092, p097
G/05Dog, Boxer<1MRoutine analysisFood allergyNoNonep030 (MTZ), p050, p096
G/06Cat, Persian2FRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep026
HH/03Dog, Mastiff<1FRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep078 (PEN), p102 (IPM, PEN), p103
H/05Dog, Pit bull<1MRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep008, p034, p079 (IPM, LZD, PEN)
II/02Cat, European shorthair14MDigestive diseaseNoneYes (3 d)Nonep054, p055
I/04Dog, Mixed-breed1HDigestive diseaseNoneYes (0 d)Nonep082, p099
Follow-up analysisNoneNoNonep052 (LZD)
JJ/01Dog, Schnauzer?FRoutine analysisFood allergyYes (10 d)Nonep053, p058 (ERY, LVX)
J/03Dog, Golden Retriever4MAcute enteritisNoneYes (0 d)Nonep013, p017, p018
J/07Dog,?1MRoutine analysisNoneYes (8 d)Nonep101
KK/02Dog, Poodle10MRoutine analysisHeart murmurNoNonep089
MM/04Dog, Giant Schnauzer11FRoutine analysisNoneYes (30 d)Nonep090[2 isolates], p091
Follow-up analysisNoneYes (5 d)Nonep043 (TET), p076 (TET), p077
M/06Dog, Brittany6FRoutine analysisObesityNoNonep060, p061, p066
Follow-up analysisObesityNoNonep068, p070 (TET), p104
M/07Dog, Brittany3FEntetitisRecent Toxocara canis infection, obesityYes (25 d)Nonep081
Follow-up analysisObesityNoNonep033, p042 (TET), p056
M/08Dog, Mixed Hound3FRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep040, p062, p080
M/13Cat, European shorthair4FRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep025, p029, p071
M/14Dog, Mixed-breed8FRoutine analysisRecent removal of mammary tumorNoAmoxicillinp016, p020, p021RT106/d01 (PEN), RT106/d03 (PEN), RT106/d15 (PEN)
Follow-up analysisNoneNoNonep014[2 isolates], p015
M/23Dog, Yorkshire Terrier12FRoutine analysisFrequent pseudo-pregnancies, benign mammary tumorsNoNonep032
M/25Dog, German Shepherd5FRoutine analysisObesityNoNonep001 (TET), p057
Follow-up analysisObesityNoNonep083 (TET), p084 (LZD, TET), p085 (LZD. TET)
M/26Dog, Mixed-breed2MRoutine analysisSeizure disorderNoNonep038, p039
Follow-up analysisSeizure disorderNoNonep086 (MTZ), p093, p100
NN/01Dog, Mixed Shih Tzu1MRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep044, p045, p046
N/12&14gDog, Shih Tzu12MRoutine analysisNoneYes (0 d)Nonep019, p024
N/19&20gDog, French Bulldog7MRoutine analysisNoneNoNoneRT009-like/d04, RT009-like/d08 (PEN), RT009-like/d09 (PEN), RT009-like/d10 (PEN), RT009-like/d11 (PEN), RT009-like/d12
OO/04Cat, European shorthair4MRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep094
O/11Dog, Border Collie2MRoutine analysisNoneYes (7 d)Nonep007, p009, p010
QQ/03Dog, Maltese7MRoutine analysisFrequent gastrointestinal problems, heart diseaseNoNonep073 (MTZ), p074, p075 (LZD)RT106/d01 (PEN) [2 isolates], RT106/d02 (PEN)
Q/04Dog, Mixed Labrador2MAllergic colitisFrequent gastrointestinal problemsYes (0 d)Sulfadiazine/trimethoprimp059
Follow-up analysisNoneNoNonep022, p098
Q/05Dog, Dachshund14MRoutine analysisNoneNoNonep048, p049

Recruited animals were designated by a capital letter (corresponding to the clinic of origin) followed by a virgule and consecutive numbers.

?: Missing data.

No: no diarrhea episodes were reported within the previous 30 days. For positive responses, the number of days since the last episode of diarrhea is indicated between parentheses.

Antibiotic treatment(s) administered within the previous 30 days. For an overview of other pharmacological treatments see Fig. 1E.

AFLP genotypes were arbitrarily designated by a lower case ‘p’ followed by a number (see Table 4). In vitro resistance to benzylpenicillin (PEN), erythromycin (ERY), imipenem (IPM), levofloxacin (LVX), linezolid (LZD), metronidazole (MTZ) and/or tetracycline (TET) is indicated between parentheses. The number of isolates belonging to each strain type (when different to one) is shown between square brackets. Dashes mean that C. perfringens was not isolated from the corresponding animal. NA: not analyzed (a single fecal swab was available for some animals, and this was used for C. difficile testing).

In this case, ribotype (RT) and AFLP fingerprinting information is included. AFLP genotypes were arbitrarily designated by a lower case ‘d’ followed by a number (see Table 5). In vitro resistance to benzylpenicillin (PEN), clindamycin (CLI) and/or erythromycin (ERY) is indicated between parentheses. Additionally, all C. difficile isolates displayed resistance to levofloxacin and imipenem. The number of isolates belonging to each strain type (when different to one) is shown between square brackets. RT?: unknown ribotype. Dashes mean that C. difficile was not isolated from the corresponding animal.

These animals were sampled twice during the study period.

Signalment and clinical data of animals yielding positive fecal cultures for Clostridium perfringens and/or C. difficile, and characteristics of recovered isolates. Recruited animals were designated by a capital letter (corresponding to the clinic of origin) followed by a virgule and consecutive numbers. ?: Missing data. No: no diarrhea episodes were reported within the previous 30 days. For positive responses, the number of days since the last episode of diarrhea is indicated between parentheses. Antibiotic treatment(s) administered within the previous 30 days. For an overview of other pharmacological treatments see Fig. 1E. AFLP genotypes were arbitrarily designated by a lower case ‘p’ followed by a number (see Table 4). In vitro resistance to benzylpenicillin (PEN), erythromycin (ERY), imipenem (IPM), levofloxacin (LVX), linezolid (LZD), metronidazole (MTZ) and/or tetracycline (TET) is indicated between parentheses. The number of isolates belonging to each strain type (when different to one) is shown between square brackets. Dashes mean that C. perfringens was not isolated from the corresponding animal. NA: not analyzed (a single fecal swab was available for some animals, and this was used for C. difficile testing).
Table 4

Characteristics of the Clostridium perfringens isolates obtained in the study.

IsolateaToxinotypebAFLP genotypecAntibiotic susceptibility (MIC, µg/ml)d
AMCCLIERYIPMLVXLZDMTZPENRIFTECTETTGCVAN
A/02P1A (cpe, cpb2*)p0630.1250.2520.0640.54160.50.0080.064811
A/02P2A (cpb2*)p0640.0320.0320.0640.0640.250.12580.1250.0040.03240.1250.5
A/02P3A (cpe)p0650.0320.0320.0320.0640.250.12580.0640.0020.0320.1250.0640.5
B/02P1Ap0670.0320.06420.0640.254160.0640.008<0.0160.1250.0640.5
B/06P1A (cpb2*)p0270.0640.06420.0640.254160.0320.004<0.01640.250.5
B/06P2A (cpb2*)p0280.0320.12520.50.254160.1250.0040.03240.50.5
B/06P3A (cpb2*)p028<0.0160.520.50.254160.0640.0080.03240.50.5
B/07P1A (cpe)p0110.0320.12510.0320.254160.0320.004<0.01620.1250.25
B/07P2A (cpe)p0120.0320.12520.0640.254160.0640.0080.03240.1250.25
B/07P3A (cpe)p023<0.0160.12520.0640.252160.1250.0080.03240.1250.25
B/08P1A (cpb2*)p0470.0320.06420.1250.254160.0640.004<0.01640.1250.5
B/08P2A (cpb2*)p0020.0320.2520.0640.252160.0640.0080.03220.50.5
B/08P3A (cpb2*)p0510.0160.12520.1250.254160.0640.0080.03240.250.5
B/11P1A (cpb2*)p0350.1250.01610.0640.251160.1250.004<0.01640.1250.5
B/11P2A (cpb2*)p0360.0160.2520.0640.25280.1250.0040.01640.50.5
B/11P3A (cpb2*)p0360.0320.2520.0080.52160.1250.0040.03240.50.5
B/12P1Ap0370.0320.0160.1250.0640.25180.0320.004<0.01610.1250.5
B/13P1A (cpb2*)p0030.0640.06420.0320.5432 (R)0.0640.0080.03220.0640.5
B/13P2Ap0060.0320.06420.250.54160.1250.0040.06480.1250.5
B/13P3Ap0310.0640.2520.0640.254160.1250.008<0.01680.1250.5
B/14P1Ap0690.0640.12520.0640.52160.250.0080.03240.250.5
B/14P2Ap0720.032220.0320.25<0.01680.0640.004<0.01640.250.5
D/02P1E (cpe)p0870.064<0.01610.50.25232 (R)0.0640.0020.03240.0640.5
D/02P2E (cpe)p0880.0640.06440.1250.258 (R)80.1250.0040.03240.251
D/02P3E (cpe)p0950.0320.03210.0640.51160.1250.0040.03220.250.5
F/09P2Ap0040.1250.0640.50.250.250.580.250.0040.0320.1250.0640.5
F/09P3Ap0050.0640.064210.25480.250.0080.06440.0641
G/01P1Ap1050.0640.0640.0640.0640.51160.0640.004<0.01610.1250.5
G2/01P1†A (cpb2*)p0920.0640.06440.1250.25480.1250.0080.06440.250.5
G2/01P2†A (cpb2*)p0970.064<0.0160.0640.1250.254160.1250.0080.01640.0640.5
G2/01P3†A (cpb2*)p0410.0320.12520.0640.25480.1250.0040.01680.250.5
G/05P1A (cpb2*)p0300.1250.06420.0640.25432 (R)0.1250.0080.03280.1250.5
G/05P2A (cpb2*)p0500.0640.2510.0640.25280.50.004<0.01640.250.5
G/05P3Ap096<0.0160.12510.0320.5440.1250.004<0.01640.1250.5
G/06P1Ap0260.1250.12520.0640.54160.1250.0080.03280.251
H/03P1Ap10280.1252≥32 (R)0.254168 (R)0.0040.03280.1250.5
H/03P2Ap07840.032210.254168 (R)0.0040.03240.1250.5
H/03P3Ap1030.0320.06410.1252280.0640.0040.06480.50.5
H/05P1Ap07980.1252≥32 (R)0.258 (R)168 (R)0.0040.03280.50.5
H/05P2Ap0080.0320.12510.0640.25140.0640.0020.01640.1250.5
H/05P3Ap034<0.0160.06420.1250.254160.0320.0080.03240.1250.5
I/02P1Ap0540.0640.06420.1250.252160.1250.0040.01640.1250.5
I/02P2Ap0550.032<0.01640.0640.50.25160.064<0.002<0.01640.0640.5
I/04P1A (cpe)P0990.1250.0320.250.1250.251160.1250.0040.0320.1250.0320.5
I/04P2Ap0820.0320.2520.0320.250.5160.125<0.002<0.01640.1250.5
I2/04P1†A (cpe)p0520.0320.12520.0640.258 (R)160.1250.0080.03240.250.5
J/01P1A (cpb2*)p0530.0640.12520.0640.54160.1250.0080.03280.51
J/01P2A (cpb2*)p0580.0640.2532 (R)0.125≥32 (R)2160.1250.0080.03240.1250.5
J/03P1Ap0180.0640.03220.0640.54160.0640.004<0.0160.1250.0640.5
J/03P2A (cpb2*)p0130.1250.0320.1250.0640.254160.064<0.002210.0322
J/03P3A (cpb2*)p0170.0160.0320.1250.0320.252160.0640.004<0.01620.0320.5
J/07P1A (cpb2)p1010.016<0.0160.1250.0640.251160.0320.0080.0320.1250.0320.5
K/02P1Ap0890.0320.12520.50.254160.1250.0040.03240.1250.5
M/04P1A (cpe)p0900.0640.12520.0640.254160.1250.0080.06480.50.5
M/04P2A (cpe)p0900.0320.125210.54160.0640.0040.06440.50.5
M/04P3A (cpe)p0910.032<0.016<0.0160.50.254160.0640.0160.06440.1250.5
M2/04P1†A (cpb2*)p0430.0320.03220.250.254160.0320.0040.01616 (R)10.5
M2/04P2†A (cpb2*)p0760.0320.06420.50.25480.0640.0080.01616 (R)0.50.5
M2/04P3†A (cpb2*)p0770.0320.0320.0640.0640.5280.0640.0040.01640.250.5
M/06P1A (cpb2*)p0660.1250.06420.0640.254160.50.0080.064821
M/06P2A (cpb2*)p0600.0320.06410.0640.252160.1250.0040.03240.250.5
M/06P3A (cpe, cpb2*)p0610.0320.0320.50.1250.254160.1250.0040.03240.1250.5
M2/06P1†Ap0680.0640.06420.50.54160.250.0080.03280.1250.5
M2/06P2†Ap0700.0160.12520.0320.254160.1250.0040.03216 (R)0.50.5
M2/06P3†Ap1040.0640.0320.250.1250.25480.1250.0080.01640.50.5
M/07P1Ap0810.250.03220.1250.254810.0080.03240.50.5
M2/07P1†A (cpb2*)p042<0.0160.03220.0640.254160.1250.0080.01616 (R)10.5
M2/07P2†Ap0560.0320.06440.1250.25480.1250.0040.03240.250.5
M2/07P3†Ap0330.0320.06410.1250.5480.250.0080.03280.250.5
M/08P1A (cpb2*)p0620.0640.520.0640.254160.25<0.0020.032820.5
M/08P2Ap0400.0320.0640.250.0640.254160.1250.0080.01610.0640.5
M/08P3Ap0800.032<0.0160.0320.0640.5180.064<0.0020.03240.1250.5
M/13P1A (cpb2*)p0290.1250.2520.0640.254160.0640.0040.032841
M/13P2A (cpb2*)p0250.0320.0320.0320.0320.250.12580.064<0.0020.03240.0320.5
M/13P3A (cpe)p0710.032120.1250.5280.0640.0020.03240.1250.5
M/14P1A (cpe)p0160.0160.06420.0640.25480.0640.0040.0160.1250.0640.5
M/14P2A (cpe)p0200.1250.520.0640.25240.1250.004<0.01620.0320.5
M/14P3A (cpe)p0210.0320.12520.0320.25280.0640.0080.01640.1250.5
M2/14P1†A (cpb2*)p014<0.0160.03220.1250.25180.064<0.0020.01640.1250.5
M2/14P2†A (cpb2*)p0150.0640.0320.0320.0640.252160.0640.0040.01640.50.5
M2/14P3†A (cpb2*)p0140.0640.03220.1250.252160.0640.0040.01640.50.5
M/23P1A (cpb2)p0320.0640.2520.0160.252160.250.0080.03240.1251
M/25P1Ap0010.125240.0640.54160.250.0080.12516 (R)21
M/25P2Ap0570.0320.01620.0640.25280.0320.0020.06480.1250.5
M2/25P1†Ap0830.0320.12520.0640.5480.1250.0040.06416 (R)10.5
M2/25P2†Ap0840.0320.12520.1250.258 (R)80.1250.0080.03216 (R)20.5
M2/25P3†Ap0850.0320.12520.1250.258 (R)80.1250.0040.03216 (R)10.5
M/26P1Ap0390.1250.12540.0640.254160.250.0040.03280.251
M/26P2Ap0380.032<0.01610.0640.25280.0640.0020.01680.0640.5
M2/26P1†Ap1000.0320.032210.254160.1250.0040.03240.250.5
M2/26P2†Ap0860.0160.06420.1250.5432 (R)0.1250.0080.03220.1250.5
M2/26P3†A (cpb2*)p0930.0160.06420.50.5480.0640.0040.03240.250.5
N/01P1A (cpb2*)p0440.1250.12520.0640.254160.0640.004<0.01680.251
N/01P2A (cpb2*)p0450.0320.06420.0640.54160.250.0040.06480.50.5
N/01P3A (cpb2*)p0460.0320.12540.0640.5180.1250.004<0.01680.250.5
N/12P1A (cpe)p0240.0640.06420.1250.254160.0640.0080.03240.50.5
N/14P1Ap0190.0320.0320.250.1250.25280.0320.004<0.01640.1250.5
O/04P1Ap0940.1250.06420.250.2541610.0080.03240.1250.5
O/11P1A (cpb2*)p0070.064<0.0160.0640.0640.25480.125<0.0020.01640.1250.5
O/11P2Ap0090.0320.06410.0320.25180.0320.0040.03280.1250.5
O/11P3Ap0100.0320.06420.0640.25280.0640.0040.03280.1250.5
Q/03P1Ap0730.1250.01620.0640.25432 (R)0.0640.004<0.01640.1250.5
Q/03P2Ap0750.0640.03220.1250.258 (R)80.250.0080.03240.1250.5
Q/03P3Ap0740.0320.12520.1250.254160.1250.0080.03240.250.5
Q/04P2Ap0590.0320.12520.1250.254160.1250.0040.01640.1250.5
Q2/04P1†A (cpb2*)p022<0.0160.12520.0640.254160.1250.0040.01640.250.5
Q2/04P3†Ap0980.0320.01640.0640.254160.1250.0040.03220.1250.5
Q/05P1A (cpb2*)p0480.016<0.0160.250.0640.51160.016<0.002<0.01610.1250.5
Q/05P2A (cpb2*)p049<0.0160.12520.0640.52160.250.0040.01640.1250.5

Isolates whose names only differ in the last number were retrieved from the same animal (e.g. H/05P1, H/05P2 and H/05P3; see Table 3). Daggers (and the number 2 after the clinic's code) indicate isolates that were obtained in the follow-up analysis.

cpe: possession of the gene encoding for enterotoxin. cpb2: possession of the gene encoding for β2 toxin, with asterisks indicating atypical forms of the gene (as determined by PCR amplification).

According to the UPGMA dendrogram shown in Fig. 1 of Álvarez-Pérez et al. [1].

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; IPM, imipenem; LVX, levofloxacin; LZD, linezolid; MTZ, metronidazole; PEN, benzylpenicillin; RIF, rifampicin; TEC, teicoplanin; TET, tetracycline; TGC, tigecycline; VAN, vancomycin. R: MIC value above the breakpoint for in vitro resistance.

In this case, ribotype (RT) and AFLP fingerprinting information is included. AFLP genotypes were arbitrarily designated by a lower case ‘d’ followed by a number (see Table 5). In vitro resistance to benzylpenicillin (PEN), clindamycin (CLI) and/or erythromycin (ERY) is indicated between parentheses. Additionally, all C. difficile isolates displayed resistance to levofloxacin and imipenem. The number of isolates belonging to each strain type (when different to one) is shown between square brackets. RT?: unknown ribotype. Dashes mean that C. difficile was not isolated from the corresponding animal.
Table 5

Characteristics of the Clostridium difficile isolates obtained in the study.

IsolateaPCR ribotypebAFLP genotypecAntibiotic susceptibility (MIC, µg/ml)d
AMCCLIERYIPMLVXLZDMTZPENRIFTECTETTGCVAN
B/08D1RT154d0610.1250.25≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.250.064≥32 (R)<0.0020.0640.0320.0160.25
B/08D2RT154d070.250.0640.25≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.250.0322 (R)<0.0020.0320.0320.0320.125
B/08D3RT154d050.1250.0320.064≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.1250.03232 (R)<0.0020.064<0.016<0.0160.125
E/03D1RT?d130.5≥256 (R)≥256 (R)≥32 (R)≥32 (R)10.032≥32 (R)<0.0020.0640.5<0.0160.125
E/03D2RT?d130.25≥256 (R)≥256 (R)≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.50.064≥32 (R)0.0040.03210.0320.125
E/03D3RT?d140.5≥256 (R)≥256 (R)≥32 (R)≥32 (R)10.125≥32 (R)<0.0020.0320.50.0320.125
M/14D1RT106d150.50.0640.125≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.250.064≥32 (R)<0.0020.032<0.016<0.0160.125
M/14D2RT106d010.250.251≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.1250.0644 (R)0.0040.032<0.016<0.0160.25
M/14D3RT106d030.50.1250.25≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.50.1252 (R)<0.0020.0320.032<0.0160.125
N/19D1RT009-liked080.50.0640.25≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.50.0324 (R)<0.0020.0640.032<0.0160.25
N/19D2RT009-liked040.064<0.0160.016≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.064<0.0161<0.0020.032<0.016<0.0160.125
N/19D3RT009-liked090.25<0.0160.064≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.125<0.0164 (R)<0.0020.0320.032<0.0160.125
N/20D1RT009-liked100.250.0640.125≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.250.032≥32 (R)<0.0020.0320.032<0.0160.25
N/20D2RT009-liked1110.0160.032≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.250.064≥32 (R)<0.0020.032<0.0160.0320.125
N/20D3RT009-liked1210.1250.25≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.1250.0641<0.0020.064<0.016<0.0160.125
Q/03D1RT106d010.250.0640.064≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.1250.032≥32 (R)<0.0020.032<0.016<0.0160.125
Q/03D2RT106d020.250.0640.25≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.1250.0322 (R)<0.0020.0640.0320.0320.25
Q/03D3RT106d010.250.1250.125≥32 (R)≥32 (R)0.250.0322 (R)<0.0020.0640.064<0.0160.25

Isolates were retrieved from the same animal (B/08D1, B/08D2 and B/08D3; see Table 3).

Toxin profiles: RT009-like, A-B-CDT- (but with a positive PCR result for tcdB); RT106, A+B+CDT-; RT154, A+B+CDT-; RT? (unknown ribotype), A-B-CDT-.

According to the UPGMA dendrogram shown in Fig. 2 of Álvarez-Pérez et al. [1].

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; IPM, imipenem; LVX, levofloxacin; LZD, linezolid; MTZ, metronidazole; PEN, benzylpenicillin; RIF, rifampicin; TEC, teicoplanin; TET, tetracycline; TGC, tigecycline; VAN, vancomycin. R: MIC value above the breakpoint for in vitro resistance.

These animals were sampled twice during the study period.

Genetic and phenotypic characteristic of C. perfringens and C. difficile isolates

Table 3 includes an overview of the genetic and phenotypic characteristics of the bacterial isolates obtained from recruited animals. Additionally, the toxinotypes, PCR ribotypes (only for C. difficile isolates), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) genotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of C. perfringens and C. difficile isolates are detailed in Table 4, Table 5, respectively. Characteristics of the Clostridium perfringens isolates obtained in the study. Isolates whose names only differ in the last number were retrieved from the same animal (e.g. H/05P1, H/05P2 and H/05P3; see Table 3). Daggers (and the number 2 after the clinic's code) indicate isolates that were obtained in the follow-up analysis. cpe: possession of the gene encoding for enterotoxin. cpb2: possession of the gene encoding for β2 toxin, with asterisks indicating atypical forms of the gene (as determined by PCR amplification). According to the UPGMA dendrogram shown in Fig. 1 of Álvarez-Pérez et al. [1]. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; IPM, imipenem; LVX, levofloxacin; LZD, linezolid; MTZ, metronidazole; PEN, benzylpenicillin; RIF, rifampicin; TEC, teicoplanin; TET, tetracycline; TGC, tigecycline; VAN, vancomycin. R: MIC value above the breakpoint for in vitro resistance. Characteristics of the Clostridium difficile isolates obtained in the study. Isolates were retrieved from the same animal (B/08D1, B/08D2 and B/08D3; see Table 3). Toxin profiles: RT009-like, A-B-CDT- (but with a positive PCR result for tcdB); RT106, A+B+CDT-; RT154, A+B+CDT-; RT? (unknown ribotype), A-B-CDT-. According to the UPGMA dendrogram shown in Fig. 2 of Álvarez-Pérez et al. [1]. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; IPM, imipenem; LVX, levofloxacin; LZD, linezolid; MTZ, metronidazole; PEN, benzylpenicillin; RIF, rifampicin; TEC, teicoplanin; TET, tetracycline; TGC, tigecycline; VAN, vancomycin. R: MIC value above the breakpoint for in vitro resistance.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Our survey was performed during one week (from November 24 to December 1, 2015) in a total of 17 primary care veterinary clinics from the Madrid region (Spain). The staff of participating clinics received training for data and sample collection, and email and telephonic support was available throughout the duration of the study. Veterinarians of participating centers were asked to select two swab samples of all feces shed by dogs and cats at their clinic, regardless of the age, origin and clinical condition of the animals, and to send those samples to a central reference laboratory at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Complutense University of Madrid. Additionally, the staff of each participating clinic had to complete a questionnaire of general data about the centre and a second questionnaire for each pair of fecal swabs obtained requesting data on the sample (collection date, consistency of feces and presence of blood) and the animal of origin (species, breed, sex, age, clinical status and episodes of diarrhea and medication(s) within the previous 30 days). An informed consent and agreement to participate in the study was obtained from the owners of each animal before enrolment. Animals were always handled by experienced veterinary practitioners in strict accordance with good animal practice and the Spanish legislation. The owners of animals yielding a positive culture for C. difficile and/or C. perfringens were invited to participate in a follow-up survey performed four months after the first study (in March 2016). In this case, fecal swab samples and clinical information of animals was obtained as explained above. The microbiology procedures used for C. perfringens and C. difficile isolation from fecal samples, and the methods used for toxin profiling, PCR ribotyping, AFLP subtyping and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of recovered isolates are detailed in our previous publication [1].

Funding sources

This work was supported by grant AGL2013-46116-R from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Subject areaBiology
More specific subject areaVeterinary microbiology, anaerobes, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium difficile
Type of dataTables, figures and text
How data was acquiredAnalysis of clinical data and characteristics of bacterial isolates
Data formatFiltered and analyzed
Experimental factorsDogs and cats attended in veterinary clinics, and the Clostridium perfringens and C. difficile isolates obtained from their feces
Experimental featuresAnalysis of general data about participating clinics, and the demographic and clinical features of recruited animals; genetic and phenotypic profiling of isolates
Data source locationUniversidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Data accessibilityData is provided with this article
  1 in total

1.  Prevalence and characteristics of Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile in dogs and cats attended in diverse veterinary clinics from the Madrid region.

Authors:  Sergio Álvarez-Pérez; José L Blanco; Celine Harmanus; Ed J Kuijper; Marta E García
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.331

  1 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.279

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.