Literature DB >> 28687280

Prevalence and characteristics of Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile in dogs and cats attended in diverse veterinary clinics from the Madrid region.

Sergio Álvarez-Pérez1, José L Blanco2, Celine Harmanus3, Ed J Kuijper3, Marta E García1.   

Abstract

Despite extensive research on the epidemiology of pathogenic clostridia in dogs and cats, most published studies focus on a selected animal population and/or a single veterinary medical centre. We assessed the burden of Clostridium perfringens and C. difficile shedding by small animals in 17 veterinary clinics located within the Madrid region (Spain) and differing in size, number and features of animals attended and other relevant characteristics. In addition, we studied the genetic diversity and antibiotic susceptibility of recovered isolates. Selective culture of all fecal specimens collected during a single week from dogs (n = 105) and cats (n = 37) attended in participating clinics yielded C. perfringens/C. difficile from 31%, 4.8% of the dogs, and 20%, 0% of the cats analyzed, respectively, and three dogs yielded both species. Furthermore, 17 animals (15 dogs and two cats) that yielded a positive culture for either species were recruited for a follow-up survey and C. perfringens was again obtained from nine dogs. Considerable differences in prevalence were observed among participating clinics for both clostridial species. C. perfringens isolates (n = 109) belonged to toxinotypes A (97.2%) and E (three isolates from one dog), whereas C. difficile isolates (n = 18) belonged to the toxigenic ribotypes 106 (33.3%) and 154 (16.7%), a 009-like ribotype (33.3%) and an unknown non-toxigenic ribotype (16.7%). Amplified fragment length polymorphism-based fingerprinting classified C. perfringens and C. difficile isolates into 105 and 15 genotypes, respectively, and tested isolates displayed in vitro resistance to benzylpenicillin (2.8%, 88.8%), clindamycin (0%, 16.7%), erythromycin (0.9%, 16.7%), imipenem (1.8%, 100%), levofloxacin (0.9%, 100%), linezolid (5.5%, 0%), metronidazole (4.6%, 0%) and/or tetracycline (7.3%, 0%). All animals from which multiple isolates were retrieved yielded ≥2 different genotypes and/or antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. Future studies should focus on the seasonal and geographical variations of prevalence and diversity patterns of clostridial species in small animals.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial resistance; Cat; Clostridium difficile; Clostridium perfringens; Dog; Genetic diversity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28687280     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  10 in total

1.  Clostridioides difficile ribotype 106: A systematic review of the antimicrobial susceptibility, genetics, and clinical outcomes of this common worldwide strain.

Authors:  T J Carlson; D Blasingame; A J Gonzales-Luna; F Alnezary; K W Garey
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.331

Review 2.  Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.279

3.  Association of Household Pets, Common Dietary Factors, and Lifestyle Factors with Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Berinstein; Calen A Steiner; Katelin J Roth; Emily Briggs; Krishna Rao; Peter D R Higgins
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  The duration of antibiotic treatment is associated with carriage of toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of Clostridioides difficile in dogs.

Authors:  Carolina Albuquerque; Davide Pagnossin; Kirsten Landsgaard; Jessica Simpson; Derek Brown; June Irvine; Denise Candlish; Alison E Ridyard; Gillian Douce; Caroline Millins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  High contamination rates of shoes of veterinarians, veterinary support staff and veterinary students with Clostridioides difficile spores.

Authors:  Joanna Wojtacka; Beata Wysok; Aleksander Kocuvan; Maja Rupnik
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.521

6.  Data from a survey of Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile shedding by dogs and cats in the Madrid region (Spain), including phenotypic and genetic characteristics of recovered isolates.

Authors:  Sergio Álvarez-Pérez; José L Blanco; Celine Harmanus; Ed J Kuijper; Marta E García
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-07-15

7.  Reversible myelosuppression suspected to be secondary to linezolid in a cat with infected subcutaneous ureteral bypass systems.

Authors:  Barry A Hedgespeth; Karen M Tefft; Allison R Kendall
Journal:  JFMS Open Rep       Date:  2020-11-24

8.  Faecal carriage of Clostridioides difficile is low among veterinary healthcare workers in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Anouk P Meijs; Esther F Gijsbers; Paul D Hengeveld; Ed J Kuijper; Cindy M Dierikx; Sabine C de Greeff; Engeline van Duijkeren
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.451

9.  Molecular Detection of Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile among Diarrheic Dogs and Cats: A Mounting Public Health Concern.

Authors:  Ahmed Samir; Khaled A Abdel-Moein; Hala M Zaher
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-22

10.  Performance of commercial PCR assays to detect toxigenic Clostridioides difficile in the feces of puppies.

Authors:  Eman Anis; Denise Barnart; Amanda Barnard; Donna J Kelly; Laurel E Redding
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.