Kelly F Bell1, Katherine Cappell2, Michael Liang3, Amanda M Kong4. 1. The time of study, a Director, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE. 2. Director, Custom Data Analytics, Truven Health Analytics, an IBM Company, Ann Arbor, MI. 3. Analyst, Truven Health Analytics, an IBM Company. 4. Research Leader, Truven Health Analytics, an IBM Company.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes treated with pharmacotherapy should be adherent to and persistent with their medications to experience glycemic control and prevent associated complications. OBJECTIVE: To compare medication adherence and persistence among patients with type 2 diabetes who are newly initiating a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor or a sulfonylurea. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using the MarketScan claims databases. The patients who were selected for the study had newly initiated treatment with an SGLT-2 inhibitor or a sulfonylurea between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015 (index date; class of earliest medication is defined as the index class); were aged ≥18 years on the index date; were continuously enrolled with health insurance for 12 months before and 6 months after (ie, follow-up) the index date; and had ≥1 baseline diagnoses of type 2 diabetes. Study exclusions were type 1 diabetes, pregnancy, and gestational diabetes. Medication adherence was measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC) with the index class during the follow-up period and dichotomized as adherent (PDC ≥80%) or nonadherent. Persistence was defined as the number of days from the index date until a >60-day continuous gap in days without the index drug class (ie, discontinuation) or the end of follow-up. A propensity score model was used to match patients receiving an SGLT-2 inhibitor to patients receiving a sulfonylurea in a 1:1 ratio based on patient characteristics. Logistic (ie, adherence) and Cox (ie, persistence) regression models were fit to the matched samples. RESULTS: Initially, the study included 17,724 patients who received an SGLT-2 inhibitor and 25,490 patients who received a sulfonylurea. After propensity score matching, 13,657 patients remained in each cohort. Compared with patients receiving a sulfonylurea, a statistically significantly greater percentage of patients receiving an SGLT-2 inhibitor were adherent to therapy (61.4% vs 53.9%, respectively; odds ratio of adherence, 1.364; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.43; P <.001) and persistent (76.1% vs 68.9%, respectively; hazard ratio of discontinuation, 0.746; 95% CI, 0.71-0.78; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Maintaining adherence to and persistence with antidiabetes medication is vital to glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. In this real-world study, patients who newly initiated treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors were more likely to adhere to treatment and persist with the initiated therapy than similar patients who newly initiated treatment with sulfonylureas.
BACKGROUND:Patients with type 2 diabetes treated with pharmacotherapy should be adherent to and persistent with their medications to experience glycemic control and prevent associated complications. OBJECTIVE: To compare medication adherence and persistence among patients with type 2 diabetes who are newly initiating a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor or a sulfonylurea. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using the MarketScan claims databases. The patients who were selected for the study had newly initiated treatment with an SGLT-2 inhibitor or a sulfonylurea between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015 (index date; class of earliest medication is defined as the index class); were aged ≥18 years on the index date; were continuously enrolled with health insurance for 12 months before and 6 months after (ie, follow-up) the index date; and had ≥1 baseline diagnoses of type 2 diabetes. Study exclusions were type 1 diabetes, pregnancy, and gestational diabetes. Medication adherence was measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC) with the index class during the follow-up period and dichotomized as adherent (PDC ≥80%) or nonadherent. Persistence was defined as the number of days from the index date until a >60-day continuous gap in days without the index drug class (ie, discontinuation) or the end of follow-up. A propensity score model was used to match patients receiving an SGLT-2 inhibitor to patients receiving a sulfonylurea in a 1:1 ratio based on patient characteristics. Logistic (ie, adherence) and Cox (ie, persistence) regression models were fit to the matched samples. RESULTS: Initially, the study included 17,724 patients who received an SGLT-2 inhibitor and 25,490 patients who received a sulfonylurea. After propensity score matching, 13,657 patients remained in each cohort. Compared with patients receiving a sulfonylurea, a statistically significantly greater percentage of patients receiving an SGLT-2 inhibitor were adherent to therapy (61.4% vs 53.9%, respectively; odds ratio of adherence, 1.364; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.43; P <.001) and persistent (76.1% vs 68.9%, respectively; hazard ratio of discontinuation, 0.746; 95% CI, 0.71-0.78; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Maintaining adherence to and persistence with antidiabetes medication is vital to glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. In this real-world study, patients who newly initiated treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors were more likely to adhere to treatment and persist with the initiated therapy than similar patients who newly initiated treatment with sulfonylureas.
Authors: Andrew M Peterson; David P Nau; Joyce A Cramer; Josh Benner; Femida Gwadry-Sridhar; Michael Nichol Journal: Value Health Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Ronan T Grimes; Kathleen Bennett; Lesley Tilson; Cara Usher; Susan M Smith; Martin C Henman Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: M Christopher Roebuck; Joshua N Liberman; Marin Gemmill-Toyama; Troyen A Brennan Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: William T Cefalu; Lawrence A Leiter; Kun-Ho Yoon; Pablo Arias; Leo Niskanen; John Xie; Dainius A Balis; William Canovatchel; Gary Meininger Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael A Nauck; Stefano Del Prato; Juris J Meier; Santiago Durán-García; Katja Rohwedder; Martina Elze; Shamik J Parikh Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Chelsea E Hawley; Julie C Lauffenburger; Julie M Paik; Deborah J Wexler; Seoyoung C Kim; Elisabetta Patorno Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: György Jermendy; Zoltán Kiss; György Rokszin; Zsolt Abonyi-Tóth; István Wittmann; Péter Kempler Journal: Diabetes Ther Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 2.945
Authors: John Wilding; Thomas Godec; Kamlesh Khunti; Stuart Pocock; Robin Fox; Liam Smeeth; Per Clauson; Peter Fenici; Niklas Hammar; Jesús Medina Journal: BMC Med Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 8.775