Literature DB >> 28794190

Model of rhythmic ball bouncing using a visually controlled neural oscillator.

Guillaume Avrin1,2,3, Isabelle A Siegler2,3, Maria Makarov4, Pedro Rodriguez-Ayerbe4.   

Abstract

The present paper investigates the sensory-driven modulations of central pattern generator dynamics that can be expected to reproduce human behavior during rhythmic hybrid tasks. We propose a theoretical model of human sensorimotor behavior able to account for the observed data from the ball-bouncing task. The novel control architecture is composed of a Matsuoka neural oscillator coupled with the environment through visual sensory feedback. The architecture's ability to reproduce human-like performance during the ball-bouncing task in the presence of perturbations is quantified by comparison of simulated and recorded trials. The results suggest that human visual control of the task is achieved online. The adaptive behavior is made possible by a parametric and state control of the limit cycle emerging from the interaction of the rhythmic pattern generator, the musculoskeletal system, and the environment.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The study demonstrates that a behavioral model based on a neural oscillator controlled by visual information is able to accurately reproduce human modulations in a motor action with respect to sensory information during the rhythmic ball-bouncing task. The model attractor dynamics emerging from the interaction between the neuromusculoskeletal system and the environment met task requirements, environmental constraints, and human behavioral choices without relying on movement planning and explicit internal models of the environment.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ball bouncing; behavioral modeling; information-movement couplings; neural oscillators; visual control

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28794190      PMCID: PMC5646202          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00054.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

Review 1.  Generating the walking gait: role of sensory feedback.

Authors:  Keir G Pearson
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.453

2.  Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement.

Authors:  D J Bennett; J M Hollerbach; Y Xu; I W Hunter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The dynamics of perception and action.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  Biological pattern generation: the cellular and computational logic of networks in motion.

Authors:  Sten Grillner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Action-perception patterns in virtual ball bouncing: combating system latency and tracking functional validity.

Authors:  Antoine H P Morice; Isabelle A Siegler; Benoît G Bardy
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Haptic feedback enhances rhythmic motor control by reducing variability, not improving convergence rate.

Authors:  M Mert Ankarali; H Tutkun Sen; Avik De; Allison M Okamura; Noah J Cowan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Passive vs. active control of rhythmic ball bouncing: the role of visual information.

Authors:  Isabelle A Siegler; Benoît G Bardy; William H Warren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Perception-action coupling in the development of visual control of posture.

Authors:  B I Bertenthal; J L Rose; D L Bai
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Development of information-movement couplings in a rhythmical ball-bouncing task: from space- to time-related information.

Authors:  C Bazile; N Benguigui; I A Siegler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Mixed control for perception and action: timing and error correction in rhythmic ball-bouncing.

Authors:  I A Siegler; C Bazile; W H Warren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hebbian Plasticity in CPG Controllers Facilitates Self-Synchronization for Human-Robot Handshaking.

Authors:  Melanie Jouaiti; Lancelot Caron; Patrick Hénaff
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.650

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.