Literature DB >> 18221787

Action-perception patterns in virtual ball bouncing: combating system latency and tracking functional validity.

Antoine H P Morice1, Isabelle A Siegler, Benoît G Bardy.   

Abstract

How can we evaluate the spatio-temporal performance of virtual environments (VE) for research use? Here we show that end-to-end latency (ETEL) of VE can strongly damage users' perceptual and perceptuo-motor behaviors and that it can be considered to be the key factor for evaluating face and functional fidelity of a VE. We used a virtual ball-bouncing task as a paradigmatic example. Ball bouncing is known to exhibit attractive and repelling states whose localization in the racket cycle is sufficiently thin to be changed by small variations of ETEL. We first present a simple test-bed to measure the intrinsic ETEL of research-related VE systems. We then report results of a psychophysical ball-bouncing experiment in which ETEL was manipulated. While face validity (i.e., subjective experience) was maintained with relatively high values, the results reveal that the perception-action behavior (performance) was damaged with smaller ETEL values. These results call for action-perception variables in order to test the fidelity of VE systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18221787     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  5 in total

1.  Visuomotor control of steering: the artefact of the matter.

Authors:  Steven Cloete; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Model of rhythmic ball bouncing using a visually controlled neural oscillator.

Authors:  Guillaume Avrin; Isabelle A Siegler; Maria Makarov; Pedro Rodriguez-Ayerbe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Development of information-movement couplings in a rhythmical ball-bouncing task: from space- to time-related information.

Authors:  C Bazile; N Benguigui; I A Siegler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mixed control for perception and action: timing and error correction in rhythmic ball-bouncing.

Authors:  I A Siegler; C Bazile; W H Warren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Major changes in a rhythmic ball-bouncing task occur at age 7 years.

Authors:  Christophe Bazile; Isabelle A Siegler; Nicolas Benguigui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.